Manufacture dependent differential biodegradation of 3D printed shape memory polymers

References

• Ramaraju H, Akman RE, Safranski DL, et al. Designing biodegradable shape memory polymers for tissue repair. Adv Funct Mater. 2020;30:2002014. doi:10.1002/adfm.202002014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balk M, Behl M, Wischke C, et al. Recent advances in degradable lactide-based shape-memory polymers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016;107:136–152. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2016.05.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng WL, Lee JM, Zhou M, et al. Vat polymerization-based bioprinting—process, materials, applications and regulatory challenges. Biofabrication. 2020;12:022001. doi:10.1088/1758-5090/ab6034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Hu Q, Wang S, et al. Digital light processing based three-dimensional printing for medical applications. Int J Bioprint. 2020;6:12–27. doi:10.18063/ijb.v6i1.242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zopf DA, Flanagan CL, Nasser HB, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of human and porcine Auricular cartilage. Laryngoscope. 2015;125:E262–E268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szczesny SE, Peloquin JM, Cortes DH, et al. Biaxial tensile testing and constitutive modeling of human supraspinatus tendon. J Biomech Eng. 2012;134:021004-1–021004-9. doi:10.1115/1.4005852/450914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales-Orcajo E, Souza TR, Bayod J, et al. Non-linear finite element model to assess the effect of tendon forces on the foot-ankle complex. Med Eng Phys. 2017;49:71–78. doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2017.07.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abraham AC, Moyer JT, Villegas DF, et al. Hyperelastic properties of human meniscal attachments. J Biomech. 2011;44:413–418. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang B, Reighard C, Flanagan C, et al. Evaluation of human nasal cartilage nonlinear and rate dependent mechanical properties. J Biomech. 2020;100:109549. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.109549
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drummond J, Tran P, Fary C. Metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: a review of adverse reactions and patient management. J Funct Biomater. 2015;6:486. doi:10.3390/jfb6030486
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison RJ, Hollister SJ, Niedner MF, et al. Mitigation of tracheobronchomalacia with 3D-printed personalized medical devices in pediatric patients. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7:285ra64. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3010825
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao S, Zhu W, Castro NJ, et al. 4D printing smart biomedical scaffolds with novel soybean oil epoxidized acrylate. Sci Rep. 2016;6:1–10. doi:10.1038/s41598-016-0001-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan X, Wei H, Zhang F, et al. 3D printing of shape memory poly(d,l-lactide-co-trimethylene carbonate) by direct ink writing for shape-changing structures. J Appl Polym Sci. 2019;136:48177. doi:10.1002/app.48177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung KC, Tseng CS, Dai LG, et al. Water-based polyurethane 3D printed scaffolds with controlled release function for customized cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2016;83:156–168. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Shi X, Miao Z, et al. 3D-printed polyurethane tissue-engineering scaffold with hierarchical microcellular foam structure and antibacterial properties. Adv Eng Mater. 2022;24:2101134. doi:10.1002/adem.202101134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gokyer S, Yilgor E, Yilgor I, et al. 3D printed biodegradable polyurethaneurea elastomer recapitulates skeletal muscle structure and function. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2021;7:5189–5205. doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c00703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akman R, Ramaraju H, Verga A, et al. Multimodal 3D printing of biodegradable shape memory elastomer resins for patient specific soft tissue repair. Appl Mater Today. 2022;29:101666. doi:10.1016/j.apmt.2022.101666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skylar-Scott MA, Mueller J, Visser CW, et al. Voxelated soft matter via multimaterial multinozzle 3D printing. Nature; 2019;575(7782):330–335. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1736-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Belleghem S, Torres L, Jr, Santoro M, et al. Hybrid 3D printing of synthetic and cell-laden bioinks for shape retaining soft tissue grafts. Adv Funct Mater. 2020;30:1907145. doi:10.1002/adfm.201907145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzzi EA, Tibbitt MW, Guzzi EA, et al. Additive manufacturing of precision biomaterials. Adv Mater. 2020;32:1901994. doi:10.1002/adma.201901994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluska E, Gruda P, Majca-Nowak N. The accuracy and the printing resolution comparison of different 3D printing technologies. Trans Aerosp Res. 2018;2018:69–86. doi:10.2478/tar-2018-0023
   Google Scholar
• Simoneti DM, Pereira-Cenci T, dos Santos MBF. Comparison of material properties and biofilm formation in interim single crowns obtained by 3D printing and conventional methods. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;127:168–172. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.06.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan WS, Suwarno SR, An J, et al. Comparison of solid, liquid and powder forms of 3D printing techniques in membrane spacer fabrication. J Memb Sci. 2017;537:283–296. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2017.05.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akman R, Ramaraju H, Hollister SJ. Development of photocrosslinked poly(glycerol dodecanedioate)—a biodegradable shape memory polymer for 3D-printed tissue engineering applications. Adv Eng Mater. 2021;23:2100219. doi:10.1002/adem.202100219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lendlein A, Neuenschwandel P, Suter UW. Tissue-compatible multiblock copolymers for medical applications, controllable in degradation rate and mechanical properties. Macromol Chem Phys. 1998;199:2785–2796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira J, Gloria A, Cometa S, et al. Effect of in vitro enzymatic degradation on 3D printed poly(ϵ-caprolactone) scaffolds: morphological, chemical and mechanical properties. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2017;15:185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moetazedian A, Gleadall A, Han X, et al. Mechanical performance of 3D printed polylactide during degradation. Addit Manuf. 2021;38:101764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimes DR, Robbins C, O’Hare NJ. Dose modeling in ultraviolet phototherapy. Med Phys. 2010;37:5251–5257. doi:10.1118/1.3484093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santerre JP, Labow RS, doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199708)36:2
   Google Scholar
• Lam CXF, Hutmacher DW, Schantz JT, et al. Evaluation of polycaprolactone scaffold degradation for 6 months in vitro and in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009;90A:906–919. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.32052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun H, Mei L, Song C, et al. The in vivo degradation, absorption and excretion of PCL-based implant. Biomaterials. 2006;27:1735–1740. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.09.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitt GG, Gratzl MM, Kimmel GL, et al. Aliphatic polyesters II. The degradation of poly (DL-lactide), poly (ϵ-caprolactone), and their copolymers in vivo. Biomaterials. 1981;2:215–220. doi:10.1016/0142-9612(81)90060-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu L, Garcia CA, Mikos AG. In vitro degradation of thin poly(DL-lactic-co-glycolic acid) films. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999;46:236–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo T, Holzberg TR, Lim CG, et al. 3D printing PLGA: a quantitative examination of the effects of polymer composition and printing parameters on print resolution. Biofabrication. 2017;9:024101. doi:10.1088/1758-5090/aa6370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lih E, Park W, Park KW, et al. A Bioinspired scaffold with anti-inflammatory magnesium hydroxide and decellularized extracellular matrix for renal tissue regeneration. ACS Cent Sci. 2019;5:458–467. doi:10.1021/acscentsci.8b00812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins C, Sousa F, Araújo F, et al. Functionalizing PLGA and PLGA derivatives for drug delivery and tissue regeneration applications. Adv Healthc Mater. 2018;7:1701035. doi:10.1002/adhm.201701035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa ML, Rezende MC, de Almeida SFM. Effect of void content on the moisture absorption in polymeric composites. Polym-Plast Technol Eng. 2007;45:691–698. doi:10.1080/03602550600609549
   Google Scholar
• Celestine ADN, Agrawal V, Runnels B. Experimental and numerical investigation into mechanical degradation of polymers. Compos B Eng. 2020;201:108369. doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro López C, Lefebvre X, Brusselle-Dupend N, et al. Effect of porosity and hydrostatic pressure on water absorption in a semicrystalline fluoropolymer. J Mater Sci. 2016;51:3750–3761. doi:10.1007/s10853-015-9692-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, MacKenzie JD, Ramachandran R, et al. Identifying neutrophils in H&E staining histology tissue images. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2014;17:73–80.
   Google Scholar
• Carnicer-Lombarte A, Chen ST, Malliaras GG, et al. Foreign body reaction to implanted biomaterials and its impact in nerve neuroprosthetics. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9:271. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2021.622524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson JM, Rodriguez A, Chang DT. Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. Semin Immunol. 2008;20:86–100. doi:10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez JL, Park J, Yao S, et al. Effect of tissue microenvironment on fibrous capsule formation to biomaterial-coated implants. Biomaterials. 2021;273:120806. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.120806
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linstrom P, Christian P. NIST standard reference database number 69. https://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/.
   Google Scholar
• Shet MS, Fisher CW, Holmans PL, et al. The omega-hydroxylation of lauric acid: oxidation of 12-hydroxylauric acid to dodecanedioic acid by a purified recombinant fusion protein containing P450 4A1 and NADPH–P450 reductase. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1996;330:199–208. doi:10.1006/abbi.1996.0243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Migneco F, Huang YC, Birla RK, et al. Poly(glycerol-dodecanoate), a biodegradable polyester for medical devices and tissue engineering scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2009;30:6479–6484. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.08.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh LS, Amer LD, Thompson BJ, et al. Mapping macrophage polarization and origin during the progression of the foreign body response to a poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogel implant. Adv Healthc Mater. 2022;11:1–32. doi:10.1002/ADHM.202102209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noskovicova N, Hinz B, Pakshir P. Implant fibrosis and the underappreciated role of myofibroblasts in the foreign body reaction. Cells. 2021;10:1–26. doi:10.3390/CELLS10071794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramaraju H, Solorio LD, Bocks ML, et al. Degradation properties of a biodegradable shape memory elastomer, poly(glycerol dodecanoate), for soft tissue repair. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0229112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zvicer J, Medic A, Veljovic D, et al. Biomimetic characterization reveals enhancement of hydroxyapatite formation by fluid flow in gellan gum and bioactive glass composite scaffolds. Polym Test. 2019;76:464–472. doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrawal CM, McKinney JS, Lanctot D, et al. Effects of fluid flow on the in vitro degradation kinetics of biodegradable scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2000;21:2443–2452. doi:10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00112-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramaraju H, Massarella D, Wong C, et al. Percutaneous delivery and degradation of a shape memory elastomer poly(glycerol dodecanedioate) in porcine pulmonary arteries. Biomaterials. 2023;293:1–14. doi:10.1016/J.BIOMATERIALS.2022.121950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martino R. Modern Plastic Encyclopedia, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Woodard LN, Grunlan MA. Hydrolytic degradation and erosion of polyester biomaterials. ACS Macro Lett. 2018;7:976–982. doi:10.1021/acsmacrolett.8b00424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Z, Wu Y, Wang J, et al. In vitro and in vivo degradation behavior of poly(trimethylene carbonate-co-d,l-lactic acid) copolymer. Regen Biomater. 2017;4:207. doi:10.1093/rb/rbx003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams D. Corrosion and degradation of implant materials, 2009, 61–75.
   Google Scholar
• Santerre JP, Labow RS, Duguay DG, et al. Biodegradation evaluation of polyether and polyester-urethanes with oxidative and hydrolytic enzymes. J Biomed Mater Res. 1994;28:1187–1199. doi:10.1002/jbm.820281009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar