A review of the current state of the art in gelatin methacryloyl-based printing inks in bone tissue engineering

References

• Chandra PK, Soker S, Atala A. Tissue engineering: current status and future perspectives. In: Lanza R, Langer R, Vacanti JP, Atala A, editors. Principles of tissue engineering. London: Academic Press; 2020. pp. 1–35. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-818422-6.00004-6
   Google Scholar
• Donati D, Zolezzi C, Tomba P, et al. Bone grafting: historical and conceptual review, starting with an old manuscript by vittorio putti. Acta Orthop. 2007;78(1):19–25. doi:10.1080/17453670610013376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urist MR. Bone: formation by autoinduction. Science (1979). 1965;150(3698):893–899. doi:10.1126/science.150.3698.893
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Li H, Ma Y, et al. Calcium phosphate-based nanomaterials: preparation, multifunction, and application for bone tissue engineering. Molecules. 2023;28(12):4790. doi:10.3390/molecules28124790
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao C, et al. Current progress in bioactive ceramic scaffolds for bone repair and regeneration. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15(3):4714–4732. doi:10.3390/ijms15034714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu H, et al. 3D bioprinting advanced biomaterials for craniofacial and dental tissue engineering – a review. Mater Des. 2024;241:112886. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2024.112886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozdil D, Aydin HM. Polymers for medical and tissue engineering applications. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2014;89(12):1793–1810. doi:10.1002/jctb.4505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schicker M, Seitz H, Drosse I, et al. Biomaterials as scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Eur J Trauma. 2006;32(2):114–124. doi:10.1007/s00068-006-6047-8
   Google Scholar
• Pilia M, Guda T, Appleford M. Development of composite scaffolds for load-bearing segmental bone defects. BioMed Res Int. 2013;2013:458253. doi:10.1155/2013/458253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Huang W, Zhou Y. et al. 3D printing of bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Bioactive Mater. 2020;5(1):82–91. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.01.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tappa K, Jammalamadaka U. Novel biomaterials used in medical 3D printing techniques. J Funct Biomater. 2018;9(1). doi:10.3390/jfb9010017
   Google Scholar
• Pugliese R, Beltrami B, Regondi S, et al. Polymeric biomaterials for 3D printing in medicine: an overview. Ann 3D Print Med. 2021;2:100011. doi:10.1016/j.stlm.2021.100011
   Google Scholar
• Ng WL, Chua CK, Shen Y-F. Print me an organ! Why we are not there yet. Prog Polym Sci. 2019;97:101145. doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nacu I, Bercea M, Niță LE, et al. 3D bioprinted scaffolds based on functionalized gelatin for soft tissue engineering. React Funct Polym. 2023;190:105636. doi:10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2023.105636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta P, Barui A, Wu Y, et al. Essential steps in bioprinting: from pre- to post-bioprinting. Biotechnol Adv. 2018;36(5):1481–1504. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander AE, Wake N, Chepelev L, et al. A guideline for 3D printing terminology in biomedical research utilizing ISO/ASTM standards. 3D Print Med. 2021;7(1):8. doi:10.1186/s41205-021-00098-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee JM, Sing SL, Zhou M, et al. 3D bioprinting processes: a perspective on classification and terminology. Int J Bioprint. 2018;4(2):1–10. doi:10.18063/ijb.v4i2.151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch F, Tröndle K, Finkenzeller G, et al. Generic method of printing window adjustment for extrusion-based 3D-bioprinting to maintain high viability of mesenchymal stem cells in an alginate-gelatin hydrogel. Bioprinting. 2020;20:e00094. doi:10.1016/j.bprint.2020.e00094
   Google Scholar
• Matai I, Kaur G, Seyedsalehi A, et al. Progress in 3D bioprinting technology for tissue/organ regenerative engineering. Biomaterials. 2020;226:119536. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udiger Landers R, Ubner B UH, Schmelzeisen R, et al. Rapid prototyping of scaffolds derived from thermoreversible hydrogels and tailored for applications in tissue engineering; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson WC, Boland T. Cell and organ printing 1: protein and cell printers. Anat Rec Pt A Discover Mol Cell Evol Biol. 2003;272(2):491–496. doi:10.1002/ar.a.10057
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boland T, Mironov V, Gutowska A, et al. Cell and organ printing 2: fusion of cell aggregates in three-dimensional gels. Anat Rec Pt A Discover Mol Cell Evol Biol. 2003;272(2):497–502. doi:10.1002/ar.a.10059
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dhariwala B, Hunt E, Boland T. Rapid prototyping of tissue-engineering constructs, using photopolymerizable hydrogels and stereolithography. Tissue Eng. 2004;10(9–10):1316–1322. doi:10.1089/ten.2004.10.1316
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee SC, Gillispie G, Prim P, et al. Physical and chemical factors influencing the printability of hydrogel-based extrusion bioinks. Chem Rev. 2020;120(19):10834–10886. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouyang L. Pushing the rheological and mechanical boundaries of extrusion-based 3D bioprinting. Trends Biotechnol. 2022;40(7):891–902. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2022.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karvinen J, Kellomäki M. Design aspects and characterization of hydrogel-based bioinks for extrusion-based bioprinting. Bioprinting. 2023;32:e00274. doi:10.1016/j.bprint.2023.e00274
   Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Jia Y, Yang Q, et al. Engineering bio-inks for 3D bioprinting cell mechanical microenvironment. Int J Bioprint. 2022;9(1):632. doi:10.18063/ijb.v9i1.632
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amorim PA, d’Ávila MA, Anand R, et al. Insights on shear rheology of inks for extrusion-based 3D bioprinting. Bioprinting. 2021;22:e00129. doi:10.1016/j.bprint.2021.e00129
   Google Scholar
• Schwab A, Levato R, D’Este M, et al. Printability and shape fidelity of bioinks in 3D bioprinting. Chem Rev. 2020;120(19):11028–11055. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedell ML, Navara AM, Du Y, et al. Polymeric systems for bioprinting. Chem Rev. 2020;120(19):10744–10792. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00834
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You S, Xiang Y, Hwang HH, et al. High cell density and high-resolution 3D bioprinting for fabricating vascularized tissues. Sci Adv. 2023;9(8). doi:10.1126/sciadv.ade7923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepowsky E, Muradoglu M, Tasoglu S. Towards preserving post-printing cell viability and improving the resolution: past, present, and future of 3D bioprinting theory. Bioprinting. 2018;11:e00034. doi:10.1016/j.bprint.2018.e00034
   Google Scholar
• Li X, Liu B, Pei B, et al. Inkjet bioprinting of biomaterials. Chem Rev. 2020;120(19):10793–10833. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Zhang X, Zhang X, et al. Recent progress of the Vat photopolymerization technique in tissue engineering: a brief review of mechanisms, methods, materials, and applications. Polymers (Basel). 2023;15(19):3940. doi:10.3390/polym15193940
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng Z, Eglin D, Alini M, et al. Visible light-induced 3D bioprinting technologies and corresponding bioink materials for tissue engineering: a review. Engineering. 2021;7(7):966–978. doi:10.1016/j.eng.2020.05.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodarzi Hosseinabadi H, Dogan E, Miri AK, et al. Digital light processing bioprinting advances for microtissue models. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2022;8(4):1381–1395. doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c01509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derakhshanfar S, Mbeleck R, Xu K, et al. 3D bioprinting for biomedical devices and tissue engineering: a review of recent trends and advances. Bioact Mater. 2018;3(2):144–156. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.11.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu W, Heinrich MA, Zhou Y, et al. Extrusion bioprinting of shear-thinning gelatin methacryloyl bioinks. Adv Healthc Mater. 2017;6(12). doi:10.1002/adhm.201601451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asim S, Hayhurst E, Callaghan R, et al. Ultra-low content physio-chemically crosslinked gelatin hydrogel improves encapsulated 3D cell culture. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024;264:130657. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.130657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendoza-Cerezo L, Rodríguez-Rego JM, Macías-García A, et al. Three-Dimensional bioprinting of GelMA hydrogels with culture medium: balancing printability, rheology and cell viability for tissue regeneration. Polymers (Basel). 2024;16(10):1437. doi:10.3390/polym16101437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin J, Yan M, Wang Y, et al. 3D bioprinting of low-concentration cell-laden gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) bioinks with a two-step cross-linking strategy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10(8):6849–6857. doi:10.1021/acsami.7b16059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gungor-Ozkerim PS, Inci I, Zhang YS, et al. Bioinks for 3D bioprinting: an overview. Biomater Sci. 2018;6(5):915–946. doi:10.1039/C7BM00765E
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mobaraki M, Ghaffari M, Yazdanpanah A, et al. Bioinks and bioprinting: a focused review. Bioprinting. 2020;18:e00080. doi:10.1016/j.bprint.2020.e00080
   Google Scholar
• Ghorbani F, Ghalandari B, Khajehmohammadi M, et al. Photo-cross-linkable hyaluronic acid bioinks for bone and cartilage tissue engineering applications. Int Mater Rev. 2023;68(7):901–942. doi:10.1080/09506608.2023.2167559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurian AG, Singh RK, Patel KD, et al. Multifunctional GelMA platforms with nanomaterials for advanced tissue therapeutics. Bioact Mater. 2022;8:267–295. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.06.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Lv J, Zhao J, et al. A versatile GelMA composite hydrogel: designing principles, delivery forms and biomedical applications. Eur Polym J. 2023;197:112370. doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2023.112370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo A, Zhang S, Yang R, et al. Enhancing the mechanical strength of 3D printed GelMA for soft tissue engineering applications. Mater Today Biol. 2024;24:100939. doi:10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100939
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mamidi N, Ijadi F, Norahan MH. Leveraging the recent advancements in GelMA scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: an assessment of challenges and opportunities. Biomacromolecules. 2023;25(4):2075–2113. doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.3c00279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koepff P, Braumer K, Babel W. U.S. Pat. Appl US 5,733,994 (1998); p. 3.
   Google Scholar
• Van Den Bulcke AI, Bogdanov B, De Rooze N, et al. Structural and rheological properties of methacrylamide modified gelatin hydrogels. Biomacromolecules. 2000;1(1):31–38. doi:10.1021/bm990017d
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal K, Srinivasan V, Lather V, et al. Insights of 3D bioprinting and focusing the paradigm shift towards 4D printing for biomedical applications. J Mater Res. 2023;38(1):112–141. doi:10.1557/s43578-022-00524-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang G, Zhao Y, Chen D, et al. Applications, advancements, and challenges of 3D bioprinting in organ transplantation. Biomater Sci. 2024;12(6):1425–1448. doi:10.1039/D3BM01934A
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaeser JD, Bao X, Kaneda G, et al. iPSC-neural crest derived cells embedded in 3D printable bio-ink promote cranial bone defect repair. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):18701. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-22502-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salg GA, Poisel E, Neulinger-Munoz M, et al. Toward 3D-bioprinting of an endocrine pancreas: a building-block concept for bioartificial insulin-secreting tissue. J Tissue Eng. 2022;13:204173142210910. doi:10.1177/20417314221091033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt SK, Schmid R, Arkudas A, et al. Tumor cells develop defined cellular phenotypes after 3D-bioprinting in different bioinks. Cells. 2019;8(10):1295. doi:10.3390/cells8101295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Xu R, Wang C, et al. Recombinant human collagen-based bioinks for the 3D bioprinting of full-thickness human skin equivalent. Int J Bioprint. 2022;8(4):611. doi:10.18063/ijb.v8i4.611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedell ML, Melchiorri AJ, Aleman J, et al. A high-throughput approach to compare the biocompatibility of candidate bioink formulations. Bioprinting. 2020;17:e00068. doi:10.1016/j.bprint.2019.e00068
   Google Scholar
• Young AT, White OC, Daniele MA. Rheological properties of coordinated physical gelation and chemical crosslinking in gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels. Macromol Biosci. 2020;20(12):2000183. doi:10.1002/mabi.202000183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen S, Wang Y, Lai J, et al. Structure and properties of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) synthesized in different reaction systems. Biomacromolecules. 2023;24(6):2928–2941. doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.3c00302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kočí Z, Sridharan R, Hibbitts AJ, et al. The use of genipin as an effective, biocompatible, anti-inflammatory cross-linking method for nerve guidance conduits. Adv Biosyst. 2020;4(3):1900212. doi:10.1002/adbi.201900212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trengove A, Duchi S, Onofrillo C, et al. Microbial transglutaminase improves ex vivo adhesion of gelatin methacryloyl hydrogels to human cartilage. Front Med Technol. 2021;3:773673. doi:10.3389/fmedt.2021.773673
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chansoria P, Asif S, Polkoff K, et al. Characterizing the effects of synergistic thermal and photo-cross-linking during biofabrication on the structural and functional properties of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2021;7(11):5175–5188. doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c00635
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu H, Casillas J, Krishnamoorthy S, et al. Effects of irgacure 2959 and lithium phenyl-2,4,6-trimethylbenzoylphosphinate on cell viability, physical properties, and microstructure in 3D bioprinting of vascular-like constructs. Biomed Mater (Bristol). 2020;15(5):82–91. doi:10.1088/1748-605X/ab954e
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kielbassa C. Wavelength dependence of oxidative DNA damage induced by UV and visible light. Carcinogenesis. 1997;18(4):811–816. doi:10.1093/carcin/18.4.811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong X, Mohanty SK, Stephens J, et al. Comparative analysis of different laser systems to study cellular responses to DNA damage in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(9):e68. doi:10.1093/nar/gkp221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedorovich NE, Oudshoorn MH, van Geemen D, et al. The effect of photopolymerization on stem cells embedded in hydrogels. Biomaterials. 2009;30(3):344–353. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.09.037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noshadi I, Hong S, Sullivan KE, et al. In vitro and in vivo analysis of visible light crosslinkable gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels. Biomater Sci. 2017;5(10):2093–2105. doi:10.1039/C7BM00110J
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Occhetta P, Visone R, Russo L, et al. VA-086 methacrylate gelatine photopolymerizable hydrogels: a parametric study for highly biocompatible 3D cell embedding. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2015;103(6):2109–2117. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.35346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biazar E, Najafi S M, Heidari K S, et al. 3D bio-printing technology for body tissues and organs regeneration. J Med Eng Technol. 2018;42(3):187–202. doi:10.1080/03091902.2018.1457094
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xu H-Q, Liu J-C, Zhang Z-Y, et al. A review on cell damage, viability, and functionality during 3D bioprinting. Mil Med Res. 2022;9(1):70. doi:10.1186/s40779-022-00429-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adhikari J, Roy A, Das A, et al. Effects of processing parameters of 3D bioprinting on the cellular activity of bioinks. Macromol Biosci. 2021;21(1):2000179. doi:10.1002/mabi.202000179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gironi P, Petraro L, Santoni S, et al. A computational model of cell viability and proliferation of extrusion-based 3D-bioprinted constructs during tissue maturation process. Int J Bioprint. 2023;9(4):741. doi:10.18063/ijb.741
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thakare K, Jerpseth L, Pei Z, et al. Green bioprinting with layer-by-layer photo-crosslinking: a designed experimental investigation on shape fidelity and cell viability of printed constructs. J Manufact Mater Process. 2022;6(2):45. doi:10.3390/jmmp6020045
   Google Scholar
• Chand R, Muhire BS, Vijayavenkataraman S. Computational fluid dynamics assessment of the effect of bioprinting parameters in extrusion bioprinting. Int J Bioprint. 2022;8(2):545. doi:10.18063/ijb.v8i2.545
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim KS, Galarraga JH, Cui X, et al. Fundamentals and applications of photo-cross-linking in bioprinting. Chem Rev. 2020;120(19):10662–10694. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkhoury K, Zuazola J, Vijayavenkataraman S. Bioprinting the future using light: a review on photocrosslinking reactions, photoreactive groups, and photoinitiators. SLAS Technol. 2023;28(3):142–151. doi:10.1016/j.slast.2023.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billiet T, Gevaert E, De Schryver T, et al. The 3D printing of gelatin methacrylamide cell-laden tissue-engineered constructs with high cell viability. Biomaterials. 2014;35(1):49–62. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.078
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertassoni LE, Cardoso JC, Manoharan V, et al. Direct-write bioprinting of cell-laden methacrylated gelatin hydrogels. Biofabrication. 2014;6(2):024105. doi:10.1088/1758-5082/6/2/024105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu W, Heinrich MA, Zhou Y, et al. Extrusion bioprinting of shear-thinning gelatin methacryloyl bioinks. Adv Healthc Mater. 2017;6(12):1601451. doi:10.1002/adhm.201601451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W, Zhu Y, Liu Y, et al. 3D bioprinting of DPSCs with GelMA hydrogel of various concentrations for bone regeneration. Tissue Cell. 2024;88:102418. doi:10.1016/j.tice.2024.102418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madrid-Sánchez A, Duerr F, Nie Y, et al. Fabrication of large-scale scaffolds with microscale features using light sheet stereolithography. Int J Bioprint. 2022;9(2):650. doi:10.18063/ijb.v9i2.650
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levato R, Dudaryeva O, Garciamendez-Mijares CE, et al. Light-based vat-polymerization bioprinting. Nat Rev Methods Primer. 2023;3(1):47. doi:10.1038/s43586-023-00231-0
   Google Scholar
• Ng WL, Lee JM, Zhou M, et al. Vat polymerization-based bioprinting—process, materials, applications and regulatory challenges. Biofabrication. 2020;12(2):022001. doi:10.1088/1758-5090/ab6034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruskowitz ER, DeForest CA. Proteome-wide analysis of cellular response to ultraviolet light for biomaterial synthesis and modification. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2019;5(5):2111–2116. doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun W, Liu Z, Xu J, et al. 3D skin models along with skin-on-a-chip systems: a critical review. Chin Chem Lett. 2023;34(5). doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2022.107819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi H, Li Y, Xu K, et al. Advantages of photo-curable collagen-based cell-laden bioinks compared to methacrylated gelatin (GelMA) in digital light processing (DLP) and extrusion bioprinting. Mater Today Bio. 2023;23:100799. doi:10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100799
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li W, Wang M, Ma H, et al. Stereolithography apparatus and digital light processing-based 3D bioprinting for tissue fabrication. iScience. 2023;26(2):106039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarker MD, Naghieh S, Sharma NK, et al. Bioprinting of vascularized tissue scaffolds: influence of biopolymer, cells, growth factors, and gene delivery. J Healthc Eng. 2019;2019:9156921. doi:10.1155/2019/9156921
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Jin X, Dai R, et al. An ultrafast hydrogel photocrosslinking method for direct laser bioprinting. RSC Adv. 2016;6(25):21099–21104. doi:10.1039/c5ra24910d
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Kumar H, Tian Z, et al. Visible light photoinitiation of cell-adhesive gelatin methacryloyl hydrogels for stereolithography 3D bioprinting. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10(32):26859–26869. doi:10.1021/acsami.8b06607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar H, Sakthivel K, Mohamed MGA, et al. Designing gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA)-based bioinks for visible light stereolithographic 3D biofabrication. Macromol Biosci. 2021;21(1):2000317. doi:10.1002/mabi.202000317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng WL, Huang X, Shkolnikov V, et al. Polyvinylpyrrolidone-based bioink: influence of bioink properties on printing performance and cell proliferation during inkjet-based bioprinting. Biodes Manuf. 2023;6(6):676–690. doi:10.1007/s42242-023-00245-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng WL, Huang X, Shkolnikov V, et al. Controlling droplet impact velocity and droplet volume: key factors to achieving high cell viability in sub-nanoliter droplet-based bioprinting. Int J Bioprint. 2021;8(1):424. doi:10.18063/ijb.v8i1.424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng WL, Shkolnikov V. Optimizing cell deposition for inkjet-based bioprinting. Int J Bioprint. 2024;10(2):2135. doi:10.36922/ijb.2135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suntornnond R, Ng WL, Huang X, et al. Improving printability of hydrogel-based bio-inks for thermal inkjet bioprinting applications via saponification and heat treatment processes. J Mater Chem B. 2022;10(31):5989–6000. doi:10.1039/D2TB00442A
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afewerki S, Sheikhi A, Kannan S, et al. Gelatin-polysaccharide composite scaffolds for 3D cell culture and tissue engineering: towards natural therapeutics. Bioeng Transl Med. 2019;4(1):96–115. doi:10.1002/btm2.10124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnamoorthy S, Zhang Z, Xu C. Biofabrication of three-dimensional cellular structures based on gelatin methacrylate–alginate interpenetrating network hydrogel. J Biomater Appl. 2019;33(8):1105–1117. doi:10.1177/0885328218823329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldana AA, Valente F, Dilley R, et al. Development of 3D bioprinted GelMA-alginate hydrogels with tunable mechanical properties. Bioprinting. 2021;21:e00105. doi:10.1016/j.bprint.2020.e00105
   Google Scholar
• Melchels FPW, Dhert WJA, Hutmacher DW, et al. Development and characterisation of a new bioink for additive tissue manufacturing. J Mater Chem B. 2014;2(16):2282–2289. doi:10.1039/c3tb21280g
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouser VHM, Melchels FPW, Visser J, et al. Yield stress determines bioprintability of hydrogels based on gelatin-methacryloyl and gellan gum for cartilage bioprinting. Biofabrication. 2016;8(3):035003. doi:10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/035003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Le Y, Yang J, et al. 3D bioprinted xanthan hydrogels with dual antioxidant and chondrogenic functions for post-traumatic cartilage regeneration. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2024;10(3):1661–1675. doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c01636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baniasadi H, Kimiaei E, Polez RT, et al. High-resolution 3D printing of xanthan gum/nanocellulose bio-inks. Int J Biol Macromol. 2022;209:2020–2031. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.04.183
   Google Scholar
• Taniguchi Nagahara MH, Caiado Decarli M, Inforçatti Neto P, et al. Crosslinked alginate-xanthan gum blends as effective hydrogels for 3D  bioprinting of biological tissues. J Appl Polym Sci. 2022;139(28):e52612. doi:10.1002/app.52612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iervolino F, Belgio B, Bonessa A, et al. Versatile and non-cytotoxic GelMA-xanthan gum biomaterial ink for extrusion-based 3D bioprinting. Bioprinting. 2023;31:e00269. doi:10.1016/j.bprint.2023.e00269
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Cruz MR, Postma A, Frith JE, et al. Printability and bio-functionality of a shear thinning methacrylated xanthan–gelatin composite bioink. Biofabrication. 2021;13(3):035023. doi:10.1088/1758-5090/abec2d
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastin H, Ormsby RT, Atkins GJ, et al. 3D bioprinting of methylcellulose/gelatin-methacryloyl (MC/GelMA) bioink with high shape integrity. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2020;3(3):1815–1826. doi:10.1021/acsabm.0c00169
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lam T, Dehne T, Krüger JP, et al. Photopolymerizable gelatin and hyaluronic acid for stereolithographic 3D bioprinting of tissue-engineered cartilage. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2019;107(8):2649–2657. doi:10.1002/jbm.b.34354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shopperly LK, Spinnen J, Krüger JP, et al. Blends of gelatin and hyaluronic acid stratified by stereolithographic bioprinting approximate cartilaginous matrix gradients. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2022;110(10):2310–2322. doi:10.1002/jbm.b.35079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon S, Park JA, Lee H, et al. Inkjet–spray hybrid printing for 3D freeform fabrication of multilayered hydrogel structures. Adv Healthc Mater. 2018;7(14):1800050. doi:10.1002/adhm.201800050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar S. Synthetic polymer-derived single-network inks/bioinks for extrusion-based 3D printing towards bioapplications. Mater Adv. 2021;2(21):6928–6941. doi:10.1039/D1MA00525A
   Google Scholar
• Kim SH, Park SJ, Xu B, et al. Development of polycaprolactone grafts with improved physical properties and body stability using a screw extrusion-type 3D bioprinter. Int J Bioprint. 2023;9(2):652. doi:10.18063/ijb.v9i2.652
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeong WY, Sudarmadji N, Yu HY, et al. Porous polycaprolactone scaffold for cardiac tissue engineering fabricated by selective laser sintering. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:2028–2034. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2009.12.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buyuksungur S, Hasirci V, Hasirci N. 3D printed hybrid bone constructs of PCL and dental pulp stem cells loaded GelMA. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2021;109(12):2425–2437. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.37235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia W, Gungor-Ozkerim PS, Zhang YS, et al. Direct 3D bioprinting of perfusable vascular constructs using a blend bioink. Biomaterials. 2016;106:58–68. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.07.038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilton M, Camilleri ET, Potes MDA, et al. Visible light-induced 3D bioprinted injectable scaffold for minimally invasive tissue regeneration. Biomater Adv. 2023;153. doi:10.1016/j.bioadv.2023.213539
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gao J, Li M, Cheng J, et al. 3D-Printed GelMA/PEGDA/F127DA scaffolds for bone regeneration. J Funct Biomater. 2023;14(2):96. doi:10.3390/jfb14020096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao J, Wang H, Li M, et al. DLP-printed GelMA-PMAA scaffold for bone regeneration through endochondral ossification. Int J Bioprint. 2023;9(5):754. doi:10.18063/ijb.754
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriakides TR, Kim H-J, Zheng C, et al. Foreign body response to synthetic polymer biomaterials and the role of adaptive immunity. Biomed Mater. 2022;17(2):022007. doi:10.1088/1748-605X/ac5574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatia S. Natural polymers vs synthetic polymer. In: Bhatia S, editor. Natural polymer drug delivery systems. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016. p. 95–118. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-41129-3_3
   Google Scholar
• Gao G, Schilling AF, Hubbell K, et al. Improved properties of bone and cartilage tissue from 3D inkjet-bioprinted human mesenchymal stem cells by simultaneous deposition and photocrosslinking in PEG-GelMA. Biotechnol Lett. 2015;37(11):2349–2355. doi:10.1007/s10529-015-1921-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leu Alexa R, Cucuruz A, Ghițulică CD, et al. 3D printable composite biomaterials based on GelMA and hydroxyapatite powders doped with cerium ions for bone tissue regeneration. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(3):1841. doi:10.3390/ijms23031841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenz A, Borchers K, Tovar GEM, et al. Bone matrix production in hydroxyapatite-modified hydrogels suitable for bone bioprinting. Biofabrication. 2017;9(4):044103. doi:10.1088/1758-5090/aa91ec
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osi AR, Zhang H, Chen J, et al. Three-Dimensional-Printable thermo/photo-cross-linked methacrylated chitosan–gelatin hydrogel composites for tissue engineering. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021;13(19):22902–22913. doi:10.1021/acsami.1c01321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosik-Kozioł A, et al. 3D bioprinted hydrogel model incorporating β-tricalcium phosphate for calcified cartilage tissue engineering. Biofabrication. 2019;11(3):035016. doi:10.1088/1758-5090/ab15cb
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi E, Kim D, Kang D, et al. 3D-printed gelatin methacrylate (GelMA)/silanated silica scaffold assisted by two-stage cooling system for hard tissue regeneration. Regen Biomater. 2021;8(2):rbab001. doi:10.1093/rb/rbab001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chimene D, Miller L, Cross LM, et al. Nanoengineered osteoinductive bioink for 3D bioprinting bone tissue. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12(14):15976–15988. doi:10.1021/acsami.9b19037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu C, Dai T, Wu X, et al. 3D bioprinting of cell-laden nano-attapulgite/gelatin methacrylate composite hydrogel scaffolds for bone tissue repair. J Mater Sci Technol. 2023;135:111–125. doi:10.1016/j.jmst.2022.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cidonio G, Alcala-Orozco CR, Lim KS, et al. Osteogenic and angiogenic tissue formation in high fidelity nanocomposite laponite-gelatin bioinks. Biofabrication. 2019;11(3):035027. doi:10.1088/1758-5090/ab19fd
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Zhou D, Wang G, et al. Enhanced bone regeneration with bioprinted GelMA/bentonite scaffolds inspired by bone matrix. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2024;19(1):e2345765. doi:10.1080/17452759.2024.2345765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xavier Mendes A, Moraes Silva S, O'Connell CD, et al. Enhanced electroactivity, mechanical properties, and printability through the addition of graphene oxide to photo-cross-linkable gelatin methacryloyl hydrogel. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2021;7(6):2279–2295. doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c01734
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang Y, Zhou D, Yang B. 3D bioprinted GelMA/GO composite induces osteoblastic differentiation. J Biomater Appl. 2022;37(3):527–537. doi:10.1177/08853282221098235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Zhang H, Zhang Y, et al. 3D printed reduced graphene oxide-GelMA hybrid hydrogel scaffolds for potential neuralized bone regeneration. J Mater Chem B. 2023;11(6):1288–1301. doi:10.1039/D2TB01979E
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cernencu AI, Vlasceanu GM, Serafim A, et al. 3D double-reinforced graphene oxide – nanocellulose biomaterial inks for tissue engineered constructs. RSC Adv. 2023;13(34):24053–24063. doi:10.1039/D3RA02786D
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boularaoui S, Shanti A, Lanotte M, et al. Nanocomposite conductive bioinks based on Low-concentration GelMA and MXene nanosheets/gold nanoparticles providing enhanced printability of functional skeletal muscle tissues. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2021;7(12):5810–5822. doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c01193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SH, et al. 3D bioprinting of human mesenchymal stem cells-laden hydrogels incorporating MXene for spontaneous osteodifferentiation. Heliyon. 2023;9(3):e14490. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moghimi N, Kamaraj M, Zehtabi F, et al. Development of bioactive short fiber-reinforced printable hydrogels with tunable mechanical and osteogenic properties for bone repair. J Mater Chem B. 2024;12(11):2818–2830. doi:10.1039/d3tb02924g
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu X, Gholipourmalekabadi M, Wang X, et al. Three-dimensional bioprinting biphasic multicellular living scaffold facilitates osteochondral defect regeneration. Interdiscip Mater. 2024:1–19. doi:10.1002/idm2.12181
   Google Scholar
• Su JJ-M, Lin C-H, Chen H, et al. Biofabrication of cell-laden gelatin methacryloyl hydrogels with incorporation of silanized hydroxyapatite by visible light projection. Polymers (Basel). 2021;13(14):2354. doi:10.3390/polym13142354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song P, Gui X, Wu L, et al. DLP fabrication of multiple hierarchical biomimetic GelMA/SilMA/HAp scaffolds for enhancing bone regeneration. Biomacromolecules. 2024;25(3):1871–1886. doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.3c01318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anada T, Pan C, Stahl AM, et al. Vascularized bone-mimetic hydrogel constructs by 3D bioprinting to promote osteogenesis and angiogenesis. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(5):1096. doi:10.3390/ijms20051096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi C-E, Chakraborty A, Adzija H, et al. Metal organic framework-incorporated three-dimensional (3D) bio-printable hydrogels to facilitate bone repair: preparation and in vitro bioactivity analysis. Gels. 2023;9(12):923–2023. doi:10.3390/gels9120923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izgordu MS, Ayran M, Ulag S, et al. Fabrication of gentamicin sulfate-loaded 3D-printed polyvinyl alcohol/sodium alginate/gelatin-methacryloyl hybrid scaffolds for skin tissue replacement. Macromol Mater Eng. 2023;308(12):2300151. doi:10.1002/mame.202300151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigata M, O’Connell CD, Cometta S, et al. Gelatin methacryloyl hydrogels for the localized delivery of cefazolin. Polymers (Basel). 2021;13(22):3960. doi:10.3390/polym13223960
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Pérez D, Guarch-Pérez C, Purbayanto MAK, et al. 3D-printed dual drug delivery nanoparticleloaded hydrogels to combat antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Int J Bioprint. 2023;9(3):683. doi:10.18063/ijb.683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahbazi M, Jäger H, Ettelaie R, et al. Multimaterial 3D printing of self-assembling smart thermo-responsive polymers into 4D printed objects: a review. Addit Manuf. 2023;71:103598. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2023.103598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai J, Wang M. Developments of additive manufacturing and 5D printing in tissue engineering. J Mater Res. 2023;38(21):4692–4725. doi:10.1557/s43578-023-01193-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y. Modern epigenetics methods in biological research. Methods. 2021;187:104–113. doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2020.06.0221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han P, Gomez GA, Duda GN, et al. Scaffold geometry modulation of mechanotransduction and its influence on epigenetics. Acta Biomater. 2023;163:259–274. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2022.01.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Man K, Alcala C, Mekhileri NV, et al. GelMA hydrogel reinforced with 3D printed PEGT/PBT scaffolds for supporting epigenetically-activated human bone marrow stromal cells for bone repair. J Funct Biomater. 2022;13(2):41. doi:10.3390/jfb13020041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Man K, Barroso A, Brunet MY, et al. Controlled release of epigenetically-enhanced extracellular vesicles from a GelMA/nanoclay composite hydrogel to promote bone repair. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(2):832. doi:10.3390/ijms23020832
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh D, Shirzad M, Chang Kim M, et al. Rheology-informed hierarchical machine learning model for the prediction of printing resolution in extrusion-based bioprinting. Int J Bioprint. 2023;9(6):1280. doi:10.36922/ijb.1280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun J, Yao K, An J, et al. Machine learning and 3D bioprinting. Int J Bioprint. 2023;9(4):717. doi:10.18063/ijb.717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng WL, Goh GL, Goh GD, et al. Progress and opportunities for machine learning in materials and processes of additive manufacturing. Adv Mater. 2024:2310006. doi:10.1002/adma.202310006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar