https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2707-5582
References
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
- Eisma, R., Lamb, C., & Soames, R. W. (2013). From formalin to Thiel embalming: What changes? One anatomy department’s experiences. Clinical Anatomy, 26(5), 564–571. doi:10.1002/ca.22222.
- Erolin, C. (2019). Interactive 3D digital models for anatomy and medical education. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 1138, 1–16. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-14227-8.
- Haragi, M., Hayakawa, M., Watanabe, O., & Takayama, T. (2021). An exploratory study of the efficacy of medical illustration detail for delivering cancer information. Journal of Visual Communication in Medicine, 44(1), 2–11. doi:10.1080/17453054.2020.1834838.
- McCloud, S. (1994). Understanding comics. HarperCollins.
- Scheltema, E., Reay, S., & Piper, G. (2018). Visual representation of medical information: The importance of considering the end-user in the design of medical illustrations. Journal of Visual Communication in Medicine, 41(1), 9–17. doi:10.1080/17453054.2018.1405724.
- Strong, J., & Erolin, C. (2013). Preference for detail in medical illustrations amongst professionals and laypersons. Journal of Visual Communication in Medicine, 36(1–2), 38–43. doi:10.3109/17453054.2013.790793.
- Tiznado-Matzner, G., Bucarey-Arriagada, S., & Pérez, R. L. (2020). Three-dimensional virtual models of 3D-scanned real cadaveric samples used as a complementary educational resource for the study of human anatomy: Undergraduate student’s perception of this new technology. International Journal of Morphology, 38(6), 1686–1692. doi:10.4067/S0717-95022020000601686.
- Trelease, R. B. (2016). From chalkboard, slides, and paper to e-learning: How computing technologies have transformed anatomical sciences education. Anatomical Sciences Education, 9(6), 583–602. doi:10.1002/ase.1620.