Advanced search
Publication Cover
Acta Orthopaedica Volume 87, 2016 - Issue 4
Journal homepage
2,024
Views
23
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Routine functional assessment for hip fracture patients

Are there sufficient predictive properties for subgroup identification in treatment and rehabilitation?

Tonny J PedersenRehabilitation Department, OUH Odense University Hospital, Svendborg Hospital; ;Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark; Correspondence[email protected]
&
Jens M LauritsenOrthopaedic Department, OUH Odense University Hospital; ;Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
Pages 374-379 | Received 06 Jan 2016, Accepted 03 Mar 2016, Published online: 22 Jun 2016

  • Binder E F, Brown M, Sinacore D R, Steger-May K, Yarasheski K E, Schechtman K B. Effects of extended outpatient rehabilitation after hip fracture: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004; 292: 837–46.
  • Bryant D M, Sanders D W, Coles C P, Petrisor B A, Jeray K J, Laflamme G Y. Selection of outcome measures for patients with hip fracture. J Orthop Trauma 2009; 23: 434–41.
  • Collin C, Wade D T, Davies S, Horne V. The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. Int Disabil Stud 1988; 10: 61–3.
  • Cree A K, Nade S. How to predict return to the community after fractured proximal femur in the elderly. Aust N Z J Surg 1999; 69: 723–5.
  • Danish_Interdisciplinary_Register_for_Hip_Fracture. 2015. National annual report 2014 [Online]. Available: https://www.sundhed.dk/content/cms/62/4662_hoftelprrapport2014endelig-kommenteret24-april-2015.pdf.
  • de Morton N A, Harding K E, Taylor N F, Harrison G. Validity of the de Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI) for measuring the mobility of patients with hip fracture during rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2013; 35: 325–33.
  • Foss N B, Kristensen M T, Kehlet H. Prediction of postoperative morbidity, mortality and rehabilitation in hip fracture patients: the cumulated ambulation score. Clin Rehabil 2006; 20: 701–8.
  • Hsieh Y W, Wang C H, Wu S C, Chen P C, Sheu C F, Hsieh C L. Establishing the minimal clinically important difference of the Barthel Index in stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007; 21: 233–8.
  • Hutchings L, Fox R, Chesser T. Proximal femoral fractures in the elderly: how are we measuring outcome? Injury 2011; 42: 1205–13.
  • Jones C J, Rikli R E, Beam W C. A 30-s chair-stand test as a measure of lower body strength in community-residing older adults. Res Q Exerc Sport 1999; 70: 113–9.
  • Jones C A, Jhangri G S, Feeny D H, Beaupre L A. Cognitive status at hospital admission: postoperative trajectory of functional recovery for hip fracture. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2015 Aug 21. pii: glv138. [Epub ahead of print]
  • Krishnan M, Beck S, Havelock W, Eeles E, Hubbard R E, Johansen A. Predicting outcome after hip fracture: using a frailty index to integrate comprehensive geriatric assessment results. Age Ageing 2014; 43: 122–6.
  • Kristensen M T. Factors affecting functional prognosis of patients with hip fracture. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2011; 47:257–64.
  • Kristensen M T, Foss N B, Ekdahl C, Kehlet H. Prefracture functional level evaluated by the New Mobility Score predicts in-hospital outcome after hip fracture surgery. Acta Orthop 2010; 81: 296–302.
  • Kristensen M T, Jakobsen T L, Nielsen J W, Jorgensen L M, Nienhuis R J, Jonsson L R. Cumulated Ambulation Score to evaluate mobility is feasible in geriatric patients and in patients with hip fracture. Dan Med J 2012; 59: A4464.
  • Kronborg L, Bandholm T, Kehlet H, Kristensen M T. Municipality-based physical rehabilitation after acute hip fracture surgery in Denmark. Dan Med J 2015; 62: A5023.
  • Lauritsen J. Simpel funktionsmåling - instruktionsmateriale (DVD og pjece). ISBN 978-87-992241-0-4 [Online]. Available: http://www.ouh.dk/uag. 2007.
  • Lexell J E, Downham D Y. How to assess the reliability of measurements in rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 84: 719–23.
  • Machin D, Altman, D G, Bryant T N, Gardner M. Statistics with confidence: confidence intervals and statistical guidelines, BMJ Books. London, 2000.
  • Mahoney F I, Barthel D W. Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. Md State Med J 1965; 14: 61–5.
  • Parker M J, Palmer C R. A new mobility score for predicting mortality after hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993; 75: 797–8.
  • Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol 1989; 42: 703–9.
  • Thorngren K G, Norrman P O, Hommel A, Cedervall M, Thorngren J, Wingstrand H. Influence of age, sex, fracture type and pre-fracture living on rehabilitation pattern after hip fracture in the elderly. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27: 1091–7.
  • Wade D T, Vergis E. The Short Orientation-Memory-Concentration Test: a study of its reliability and validity. Clin Rehabil 1999; 13: 164–70.
  • Wittrup-Jensen K U, Lauridsen J, Gudex C, Pedersen K M. Generation of a Danish TTO value set for EQ-5D health states. Scand J Public Health 2009; 37: 459–66.
  • WHO. International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Kbh.: Danmarks Blindebibliotek. 2002.
  • Zhou, X-H, McClish D K, Obuchowski N A. Statistical methods in diagnostic medicine. 2 ed. NJ: Wiley. Hoboken, 2011.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.