8,023
Views
44
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Patient-reported outcome after total hip arthroplasty: comparison between lateral and posterior approach

A randomized controlled trial in 80 patients with 12-month follow-up

, , , &
Pages 239-247 | Received 12 Jan 2016, Accepted 16 Dec 2016, Published online: 18 Feb 2017

  • Amlie E, Havelin L I, Furnes O, Baste V, Nordsletten L, Hovik O, et al. Worse patient-reported outcome after lateral approach than after anterior and posterolateral approach in primary hip arthroplasty. A cross-sectional questionnaire study of 1,476 patients 1-3 years after surgery. Acta Orthop 2014; 85 (5): 463–9.
  • Arthursson A J, Furnes O, Espehaug B, Havelin L I, Soreide J A. Prosthesis survival after total hip arthroplasty-does surgical approach matter? Analysis of 19,304 Charnley and 6,002 Exeter primary total hip arthroplasties reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2007; 78 (6): 719–29.
  • Beyer N, Thorborg K, Vinther A. Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Danish Version of the Hip Dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score 2.0 (HOOS 2.0). 2008; http://koos.nu/HOOSdansk.pdf 4 December, 2015.
  • Brooks R. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 1996; 37 (1): 53–72.
  • Bystrom S, Espehaug B, Furnes O, Havelin L I, Norwegian Arthroplasty R. Femoral head size is a risk factor for total hip luxation: a study of 42,987 primary hip arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop Scand 2003; 74 (5): 514–24.
  • Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull 1992; 112 (1): 155–9.
  • Coretti S, Ruggeri M, McNamee P. The minimum clinically important difference for EQ-5D index: a critical review. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2014; 14 (2): 221–33.
  • Davis A M, Perruccio A V, Canizares M, Tennant A, Hawker G A, Conaghan P G, et al. The development of a short measure of physical function for hip OA HOOS-Physical Function Shortform (HOOS-PS): an OARSI/OMERACT initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008; 16 (5): 551–9.
  • Davis A M, Perruccio A V, Canizares M, Hawker G A, Roos E M, Maillefert J F, et al. Comparative, validity and responsiveness of the HOOS-PS and KOOS-PS to the WOMAC physical function subscale in total joint replacement for osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009; 17 (7): 843–7.
  • Edmunds C T, Boscainos P J. Effect of surgical approach for total hip replacement on hip function using Harris Hip scores and Trendelenburg’s test. A retrospective analysis. Surgeon 2011; 9 (3): 124–9.
  • Ehrich E W, Davies G M, Watson D J, Bolognese J A, Seidenberg B C, Bellamy N. Minimal perceptible clinical improvement with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index questionnaire and global assessments in patients with osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 2000; 27 (11): 2635–41.
  • Frobell R, Lohmander S, Roos E, Roos H, Ranstam J. Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) for the KANON-Study. Journal [serial online]. 2008 Date: [20 screens]. Available from: https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/publication/1276774.
  • Gudex C M, Sørensen J. Et generisk mål for helbredstilstand. Månedsskrift for praktisk lægegerning 1998; 76 (10): 1339–45.
  • Hailer N P, Weiss R J, Stark A, Karrholm J. The risk of revision due to dislocation after total hip arthroplasty depends on surgical approach, femoral head size, sex, and primary diagnosis. Acta Orthop 2012; 83 (5): 442–8.
  • Hendrickx C, De Hertogh W, Van Daele U, Mertens P, Stassijns G. Effect of percutaneous assisted approach on functional rehabilitation for total hip replacement compared to anterolateral approach: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2014; 15: 392.
  • Hoppenfeld S, deBoer P, Buckley R. Surgical Exposures in Orthopaedics. The Anatomic Approach. The Hip, Fourth Edition. Lippinoctt Williams & Wilkins 2009.
  • Jameson S S, Mason J, Baker P, Gregg P J, McMurtry I A, Deehan D J, et al. A comparison of surgical approaches for primary hip arthroplasty: a cohort study of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and early revision using linked national databases. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (6): 1248–55 e1.
  • Jolles B M, Bogoch E R. Posterior versus lateral surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty in adults with osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; (1): CD003828.
  • Kise N J, Roos E, Risberg M A, Ranstam J. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS PLAN (SAP) FOR: The Odense-Oslo Meniscectomy versus Exercise (OMEX) study. A randomized controlled trial for treatment of degenerative meniscus tears in middle-aged patients with a 2-year follow-up. Journal [serial online]. 2015 Date: [24 screens]. Available from: http://www.sdu.dk/om_sdu/institutter_centre/iob_idraet_og_biomekanik/forskning/forskningsenheder/fof/forskningsprojekter/omex.
  • Kise N J, Risberg M A, Stensrud S, Ranstam J, Engebretsen L, Roos E M. Exercise therapy versus arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for degenerative meniscal tear in middle aged patients: randomised controlled trial with two year follow-up. BMJ 2016; 354: i3740.
  • Larsen K, Hansen T B, Soballe K, Kehlet H. Patient-reported outcome after fast-track hip arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2010; 8: 144.
  • Lewinnek G E, Lewis J L, Tarr R, Compere C L, Zimmerman J R. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978; 60 (2): 217–20.
  • Lindgren J V, Wretenberg P, Karrholm J, Garellick G, Rolfson O. Patient-reported outcome is influenced by surgical approach in total hip replacement: a study of the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register including 42,233 patients. Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B (5): 590–6.
  • Lindgren V, Garellick G, Karrholm J, Wretenberg P. The type of surgical approach influences the risk of revision in total hip arthroplasty: a study from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register of 90,662 total hipreplacements with 3 different cemented prostheses. Acta Orthop 2012; 83 (6): 559–65.
  • Mahomed N N, Arndt D C, McGrory B J, Harris W H. The Harris hip score: comparison of patient self-report with surgeon assessment. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16 (5): 575–80.
  • Masonis J L, Bourne R B. Surgical approach, abductor function, and total hip arthroplasty dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002; (405): 46–53.
  • Mulliken B D, Rorabeck C H, Bourne R B, Nayak N. A modified direct lateral approach in total hip arthroplasty: a comprehensive review. J Arthroplasty 1998; 13 (7): 737–47.
  • Nilsdotter A K, Lohmander L S, Klassbo M, Roos E M. Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)–validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2003; 4: 10.
  • Overgaard S. Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register-Annual report of 2013. Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register-Annual report of 2013. Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register; 2013.
  • Paulsen A, Overgaard S, Lauritsen J M. Quality of data entry using single entry, double entry and automated forms processing–an example based on a study of patient-reported outcomes. PLoS One 2012; 7 (4): e35087.
  • Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A. Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata, Second Edition. Stata Press 2008.
  • Repantis T, Bouras T, Korovessis P. Comparison of minimally invasive approach versus conventional anterolateral approach for total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2015; 25 (1): 111–6.
  • Roos E M. KOOS FAQs. 2012; http://koos.nu/index.html 4 December 2015.
  • Roos E M, Lohmander L S. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003; 1: 64.
  • Rosenlund S, Broeng L, Jensen C, Holsgaard-Larsen A, Overgaard S. The effect of posterior and lateral approach on patient-reported outcome measures and physical function in patients with osteoarthritis, undergoing total hip replacement: a randomised controlled trial protocol. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014; 15: 354.
  • Skou S T, Roos E M, Laursen M B, Rathleff M S, Arendt-Nielsen L, Simonsen O H, et al. Total knee replacement plus physical and medical therapy or treatment with physical and medical therapy alone: a randomised controlled trial in patients with knee osteoarthritis (the MEDIC-study). BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2012; 13: 67.
  • Terwee C B, Roorda L D, Knol D L, De Boer M R, De Vet H C. Linking measurement error to minimal important change of patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62 (10): 1062–7.
  • Terwee C B, Bouwmeester W, van Elsland S L, de Vet H C, Dekker J. Instruments to assess physical activity in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a systematic review of measurement properties. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011; 19 (6): 620–33.
  • Thorborg K, Roos E M, Bartels E M, Petersen J, Holmich P. Validity, reliability and responsiveness of patient-reported outcome questionnaires when assessing hip and groin disability: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med 2010; 44 (16): 1186–96.
  • van Reenen M, Oppe M. EQ-5D-3L User Guide- Basic information on how to use the EQ-5D-3L instrument 2015; http://www.euroqol.org/about-eq-5d/publications/user-guide.html 5 December, 2015.
  • Villadsen A, Overgaard S, Holsgaard-Larsen A, Christensen R, Roos E M. Postoperative effects of neuromuscular exercise prior to hip or knee arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2014; 73 (6): 1130–7.
  • Wittrup-Jensen K U, Lauridsen J, Gudex C, Pedersen K M. Generation of a Danish TTO value set for EQ-5D health states. Scand J Public Health 2009; 37 (5): 459–66.
  • Witzleb W C, Stephan L, Krummenauer F, Neuke A, Gunther K P. Short-term outcome after posterior versus lateral surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty - A randomized clinical trial. Eur J Med Res 2009; 14 (6): 256–63.