Advanced search
Publication Cover
Acta Orthopaedica Volume 88, 2017 - Issue 6
Journal homepage
1,391
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Excellent long-term results of the Müller acetabular reinforcement ring in primary cup revision

A single-center study of 259 cases after a mean of 10 years’ follow-up

Pascal Mueller GreberDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Kantonsspital Baselland, Liestal, Switzerland;
,
Isabella ManzoniDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Kantonsspital Baselland, Liestal, Switzerland;
,
Peter E OchsnerDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Kantonsspital Baselland, Liestal, Switzerland;
,
Thomas IlchmannDepartment of Orthopedics, Hirslanden Klinik Birshof, Münchenstein, Switzerland
,
Lukas ZwickyDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Kantonsspital Baselland, Liestal, Switzerland;
&
Martin ClaussDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Kantonsspital Baselland, Liestal, Switzerland; Correspondence[email protected]
Pages 619-626 | Received 09 Feb 2017, Accepted 10 Jul 2017, Published online: 03 Aug 2017

  • Azuma T, Yasuda H, Okagaki K, Sakai K. Compressed allograft chips for acetabular reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1994; 76 (5): 740–4.
  • Ballester Alfaro J J, Sueiro Fernandez J. Trabecular metal buttress augment and the trabecular metal cup-cage construct in revision hip arthroplasty for severe acetabular bone loss and pelvic discontinuity. Hip Int 2010; 20 (Suppl 7): 119–27.
  • Bircher H P, Riede U, Luem M, Ochsner P E. [The value of the Wagner SL revision prosthesis for bridging large femoral defects]. Orthopade 2001; 30 (5): 294–303.
  • Born P, Ilchmann T, Zimmerli W, Zwicky L, Graber P, Ochsner P E, Clauss M. Eradication of infection, survival, and radiological results of uncemented revision stems in infected total hip arthroplasties. Acta Orthop 2016: 87(6): 637–43.
  • Brooks P J. The jumbo cup: The 95% solution. Orthopedics 2008; 31 (9): 913–15.
  • Bruggemann A, Fredlund E, Mallmin H, Hailer N P. Are porous tantalum cups superior to conventional reinforcement rings? Acta Orthop 2017; 88 (1): 35–40.
  • D’Antonio J A, Capello W N, Borden L S, Bargar W L, Bierbaum B F, Boettcher W G, Steinberg M E, Stulberg S D, Wedge J H. Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989; (243): 126–37.
  • DeLee J G, Charnley J. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976; (121): 20–32.
  • Della Valle C J, Berger R A, Rosenberg A G, Galante J O. Cementless acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (420): 96–100.
  • Garcia-Cimbrelo E, Cruz-Pardos A, Garcia-Rey E, Ortega-Chamarro J. The survival and fate of acetabular reconstruction with impaction grafting for large defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468 (12): 3304–13.
  • Gill T J, Sledge J B, Muller M E. Total hip arthroplasty with use of an acetabular reinforcement ring in patients who have congenital dysplasia of the hip: Results at five to fifteen years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998; 80 (7): 969–79.
  • Gooley T A, Leisenring W, Crowley J, Storer B E. Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: New representations of old estimators. Stat Med 1999; 18 (6): 695–706.
  • Haentjens P, Handelberg F, Casteleyn P P, Opdecam P. Experience with the Muller acetabular roof reinforcement ring in conventional and in revision arthroplasty of the hip. Acta Orthop Belg 1986; 52 (3): 344–7.
  • Hallstrom B R, Golladay G J, Vittetoe D A, Harris W H. Cementless acetabular revision with the Harris-Galante porous prosthesis: Results after a minimum of ten years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86-A (5): 1007–11.
  • Ibrahim M S, Raja S, Haddad F S. Acetabular impaction bone grafting in total hip replacement. Bone Joint J 2013; 95-B (11 Suppl A): 98–102.
  • Ilchmann T, Gelzer J P, Winter E, Weise K. Acetabular reconstruction with the Burch-Schneider ring: An EBRA analysis of 40 cup revisions. Acta Orthop 2006; 77 (1): 79–86.
  • Ilchmann T, Zimmerli W, Ochsner P E, Kessler B, Zwicky L, Graber P, Clauss M. One-stage revision of infected hip arthroplasty: Outcome of 39 consecutive hips. Int Orthop 2016; 40 (5): 913–18.
  • Joshi R P, Eftekhar N S, McMahon D J, Nercessian O A. Osteolysis after Charnley primary low-friction arthroplasty: A comparison of two matched paired groups. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998; 80 (4): 585–90.
  • Kondo K, Nagaya I. Bone incorporation of frozen femoral head allograft in revision total hip replacement. Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi 1993; 67 (5): 408–16.
  • Korovessis P, Stamatakis M, Baikousis A, Katonis P, Petsinis G. Mueller roof reinforcement rings. Medium-term results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999; (362): 125-37.
  • Kosters C, Schliemann B, Decking D, Simon U, Zurstegge M, Decking J. The Muller acetabular reinforcement ring: Still an option in acetabular revision of Paprosky 2 defects? Long term results after 10 years. Acta Orthop Belg 2015; 81 (2): 257–63.
  • Laflamme G Y, Alami G B, Zhim F. Cement as a locking mechanism for screw heads in acetabular revision shells: A biomechanical analysis. Hip Int 2008; 18 (1): 29–34.
  • Lie S A, Engesaeter L B, Havelin L I, Gjessing H K, Vollset S E. Dependency issues in survival analyses of 55,782 primary hip replacements from 47,355 patients. Stat Med 2004; 23 (20): 3227–40.
  • Molicnik A, Hanc M, Recnik G, Krajnc Z, Rupreht M, Fokter S K. Porous tantalum shells and augments for acetabular cup revisions. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2014; 24 (6): 911–17.
  • Morsi E, Garbuz D, Gross A E. Revision total hip arthroplasty with shelf bulk allografts: A long-term follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 1996; 11 (1): 86–90.
  • Nunn D, Freeman M A, Hill P F, Evans S J. The measurement of migration of the acetabular component of hip prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1989; 71 (4): 629–31.
  • Ochsner P E. Total hip replacement. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2003.
  • Paprosky W G, Perona P G, Lawrence J M. Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty: A 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 1994; 9 (1): 33–44.
  • R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing Vienna, Austria, 2015. (http://www.R-project.org/)
  • Ranstam J, Karrholm J, Pulkkinen P, Makela K, Espehaug B, Pedersen A B, Mehnert F, Furnes O, group N s. Statistical analysis of arthroplasty data, II: Guidelines. Acta Orthop 2011; 82 (3): 258–67.
  • Regis D, Magnan B, Sandri A, Bartolozzi P. Long-term results of anti-protrusion cage and massive allografts for the management of periprosthetic acetabular bone loss. J Arthroplasty 2008; 23 (6): 826–32.
  • Regis D, Sandri A, Bonetti I, Bortolami O, Bartolozzi P. A minimum of 10-year follow-up of the Burch-Schneider cage and bulk allografts for the revision of pelvic discontinuity. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27 (6): 1057–63 e1.
  • Robertsson O, Ranstam J. No bias of ignored bilaterality when analysing the revision risk of knee prostheses: Analysis of a population based sample of 44,590 patients with 55,298 knee prostheses from the national Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2003; 4: 1.
  • Rosson J, Schatzker J. The use of reinforcement rings to reconstruct deficient acetabula. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1992; 74 (5): 716–20.
  • Rue J P, Inoue N, Mont M A. Current overview of neurovascular structures in hip arthroplasty: Anatomy, preoperative evaluation, approaches, and operative techniques to avoid complications. Orthopedics 2004; 27 (1): 73–81.
  • Schatzker J, Glynn M K, Ritter D. A preliminary review of the Muller acetabular and Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio support rings. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1984; 103 (1): 5–12.
  • Schlegel U J, Bitsch R G, Pritsch M, Clauss M, Mau H, Breusch S J. Mueller reinforcement rings in acetabular revision: Outcome in 164 hips followed for 2–17 years. Acta Orthop 2006; 77 (2): 234–41.
  • Schreurs B W, Keurentjes J C, Gardeniers J W, Verdonschot N, Slooff T J, Veth R P. Acetabular revision with impacted morsellised cancellous bone grafting and a cemented acetabular component: A 20- to 25-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009; 91 (9): 1148–53.
  • Schwarzer G, Schumacher M, Maurer T B, Ochsner P E. Statistical analysis of failure times in total joint replacement. J Clin Epidemiol 2001; 54 (10): 997–1003.
  • Sirka A, Clauss M, Tarasevicius S, Wingstrand H, Stucinskas J, Robertsson O, Ochsner P E, Ilchmann T. Excellent long-term results of the Muller acetabular reinforcement ring in primary total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2016; 87 (2): 100–5.
  • Slooff T J, Huiskes R, van Horn J, Lemmens A J. Bone grafting in total hip replacement for acetabular protrusion. Acta Orthop Scand 1984; 55 (6): 593–6.
  • Taylor E D, Browne J A. Reconstruction options for acetabular revision. World J Orthop 2012; 3 (7): 95–100.
  • Van Kleunen J P, Lee G C, Lementowski P W, Nelson C L, Garino J P. Acetabular revisions using trabecular metal cups and augments. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24 (6 Suppl): 64–8.
  • von Roth P, Abdel M P, Harmsen W S, Berry D J. Uncemented jumbo cups for revision total hip arthroplasty: A concise follow-up, at a mean of twenty years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97 (4): 284–7.
  • Wachtl S W, Jung M, Jakob R P, Gautier E. The Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage in acetabular revision surgery: A mean follow-up of 12 years. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15 (8): 959–63.
  • Wedemeyer C, Neuerburg C, Heep H, von Knoch F, von Knoch M, Loer F, Saxler G. Jumbo cups for revision of acetabular defects after total hip arthroplasty: A retrospective review of a case series. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2008; 128 (6): 545–50.
  • Zicat B, Engh C A, Gokcen E. Patterns of osteolysis around total hip components inserted with and without cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995; 77 (3): 432–9.
  • Zimmerli W, Trampuz A, Ochsner P E. Prosthetic-joint infections. N Engl J Med 2004; 351 (16): 1645–54.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.