Advanced search
Publication Cover
Acta Orthopaedica Volume 89, 2018 - Issue 3
Journal homepage
3,410
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Trabecular metal acetabular components in primary total hip arthroplasty

Higher risk for revision compared with other uncemented cup designs in a ­collaborative register study including 93,709 hips

Inari LaaksonenHarris Orthopedic Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA; ;Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA;
,
Michelle LorimerAustralian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, Adelaide, Australia;
,
Kirill GromovDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark; Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Aarhus, Denmark;
,
Antti EskelinenCoxa Hospital for Joint Replacement, Tampere, Finland; Finnish Arthroplasty Register, Helsinki, Finland;
,
Ola RolfsonSwedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Surgical Sciences, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
,
Stephen E GravesAustralian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, Adelaide, Australia;
,
Henrik MalchauHarris Orthopedic Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA; ;Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; ;Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Surgical Sciences, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, SwedenCorrespondence[email protected]
&
Maziar MohaddesSwedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Surgical Sciences, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
 show all
Pages 259-264 | Received 06 Apr 2017, Accepted 25 Nov 2017, Published online: 05 Feb 2018

  • AOANJRR. AOANJRR validation process. Available from: https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/en/data [last accessed December 12, 2017].
  • AOANJRR. Annual Report 2016. Available from: https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/annual-reports-2016 [last accessed December 12, 2017].
  • Baad-Hansen T, Kold S, Nielsen P T, Laursen M B, Christensen P H, Soballe K. Comparison of trabecular metal cups and titanium fiber-mesh cups in primary hip arthroplasty: a randomized RSA and bone mineral densitometry study of 50 hips. Acta Orthop 2011; 82(2): 155–60.
  • Beckmann N A, Weiss S, Klotz M C M, Gondan M, Jaeger S, Bitsch R G. Loosening after acetabular revision: comparison of trabecular metal and reinforcement rings. A systematic review. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29(1): 229–35.
  • Bobyn J D, Stackpool G J, Hacking S A, Tanzer M, Krygier J J. Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial. J Bone Joint Surg 1999; 81(5): 907–14.
  • Dale H, Fenstad A M, Hallan G, Havelin L I, Furnes O, Overgaard S, et al. Increasing risk of prosthetic joint infection after total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2012; 83(5): 449–58.
  • Dale H, Hallan G, Hallan G, Espehaug B, Havelin L I, Engesaeter L B. Increasing risk of revision due to deep infection after hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2009; 80(6): 639–45.
  • Davies J H, Laflamme G Y, Delisle J, Fernandes J. Trabecular metal used for major bone loss in acetabular hip revision. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26(8): 1245–50.
  • De Martino I, De Santis V, Sculco P K, D’Apolito R, Poultsides L A, Gasparini G. Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of porous tantalum monoblock acetabular component in primary hip arthroplasty: a minimum of 15-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31(9): 110–14.
  • Gundtoft P H, Overgaard S, Schønheyder H C, Møller J K, Kjaersgaard-Andersen P, Pedersen A B. The incidence of surgically treated deep prosthetic joint infection after 32,896 primary total hip arthroplasties: a prospective cohort study. Acta Orthop 2015; 86(3): 326–34.
  • Howard J L, Kremers H M, Loechler Y A, Schleck C D, Harmsen WS, Berry D J, et al. Comparative survival of uncemented acetabular components following primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2011; 93(17)1597–604.
  • Huotari K, Peltola M, Jämsen E. The incidence of late prosthetic joint infections: a registry-based study of 112,708 primary hip and knee replacements. Acta Orthop 2015; 86(3):3 21–5.
  • Jafari S M, Bender B, Coyle C, Parvizi J, Sharkey P F, Hozack W J. Do tantalum and titanium cups show similar results in revision hip arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468(2): 459–65.
  • Jameson S S, Lees D, James P, Serrano-Pedraza I, Partington P F, Muller S D, et al. Lower rates of dislocation with increased femoral head size after primary total hip replacement: a five-year analysis of NHS patients in England. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2011; 93: 876–80.
  • Kremers H M, Howard J L, Loechler Y, Schleck C D, Harmsen W S, Berry D J, et al. Comparative long-term survivorship of uncemented acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2012; 94(12): e82.
  • Lindgren J V, Gordon M, Wretenberg P, Kärrholm J, Garellick G. Validation of reoperations due to infection in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014; 15: 384.
  • Macheras G, Kateros K, Kostakos A, Koutsostathis S, Danomaras D, Papagelopoulos P J. Eight- to ten-year clinical and radiographic outcome of a porous tantalum monoblock acetabular component. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24(5): 705–9.
  • Mohaddes M, Rolfson O, Kärrholm J. Short-term survival of the trabecular metal cup is similar to that of standard cups used in acetabular revision surgery. Acta Orthop 2015; 86(1): 26–31.
  • Noiseux N O, Long W J, Mabry T M, Hanssen A D, Lewallen D G. Uncemented porous tantalum acetabular components: early follow-up and failures in 613 primary total hip arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29(3): 617–20.
  • Pulido L, Ghanem E, Joshi A, Purtill J J, Parvizi J. Periprosthetic joint infection: the incidence, timing, and predisposing factors. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 466(7): 1710–15.
  • Siegmeth A, Duncan C P, Masri B A, Kim W Y, Garbuz D S. Modular tantalum augments for acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467(1): 199–205.
  • Skyttä E T, Eskelinen A, Paavolainen P O, Remes V M. Early results of 827 trabecular metal revision shells in acetabular revision. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26(3): 342–5.
  • Sternheim A, Backstein D, Kuzyk P R, Goshua G, Berkovich Y, Safir O, Gross A E. Porous metal revision shells for management of contained acetabular bone defects at a mean follow-up of six years: a comparison between up to 50% bleeding host bone contact and more than 50% contact. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012; 94(2): 158–62.
  • Tokarski A T, Novack T A, Parvizi J. Is tantalum protective against infection in revision total hip arthroplasty? Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B(1): 45–9.
  • Weeden S H, Schmidt R H. The use of tantalum porous metal implants for Paprosky 3A and 3B defects. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22(6Suppl): 151–5.
  • Wegrzyn J, Kaufman K R, Hanssen A D, Lewallen D G. Performance of porous tantalum vs. titanium cup in total hip arthroplasty: randomized trial with minimum 10-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30(6): 1008–13.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.