1,206
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Annotation

Patient-reported outcome after hip dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty is virtually unknown: a systematic literature review

, , &

  • Bozic K J, Kamath A F, Ong K, Lau E, Kurtz S, Chan V, Vail T P, Rubash H, Berry D J. Comparative epidemiology of revision arthroplasty: failed THA poses greater clinical and economic burdens than failed TKA. Clinical Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473(6): 2131–8.
  • CASP. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. CASP (Case-control and Cohort) Checklist. [online] Available at: http://www.casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists; 2017. Accessed: November 3, 2017.
  • Dargel J, Oppermann J, Bruggemann G P, Eysel P. Dislocation following total hip replacement. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2014; 111(51-52): 884–90.
  • Edmunds C T, Boscainos P J. Effect of surgical approach for total hip replacement on hip function using Harris Hip scores and Trendelenburg’s test. A retrospective analysis. Surgeon 2011; 9(3): 124–9.
  • Forsythe M E, Whitehouse S L, Dick J, Crawford R W. Functional outcomes after nonrecurrent dislocation of primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22(2): 227–30.
  • Jo S, Jimenez Almonte J H, Sierra R J. The cumulative risk of re-dislocation after revision THA performed for instability increases close to 35% at 15 years. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30(7): 1177–82.
  • Jorgensen C C, Kjaersgaard-Andersen P, Solgaard S, Kehlet H, Lundbeck Foundation Centre for Fast-track H, Knee Replacement Collaborative G. Hip dislocations after 2,734 elective unilateral fast-track total hip arthroplasties: incidence, circumstances and predisposing factors. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2014; 134(11): 1615–22.
  • Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D G. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62(10): 1006–12.
  • Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart L A. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 2015; 4: 1.
  • Paulsen A. Patient reported outcomes in hip arthroplasty registries. Dan Med J 2014;61(5):B4845.
  • Petis S, Howard J L, Lanting B L, Vasarhelyi E M. Surgical approach in primary total hip arthroplasty: anatomy, technique and clinical outcomes. Can J Surg 2015; 58(2): 128–39.
  • Rolfson O, Bohm E, Franklin P, Lyman S, Denissen G, Dawson J, Dunn J, Eresian Chenok K, Dunbar M, Overgaard S, Garellick G, Lubbeke A, Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Working Group of the International Society of Arthroplasty R. Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries. Report of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Working Group of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries Part II. Recommendations for selection, administration, and analysis. Acta Orthop 2016; 87(eSuppl 362): 9–23.
  • Singh J, Politis A, Loucks L, Hedden D R, Bohm E R. Trends in revision hip and knee arthroplasty observations after implementation of a regional joint replacement registry. Can J Surg 2016; 59(5): 304–10.
  • Wetters N G, Murray T G, Moric M, Sporer S M, Paprosky W G, Della Valle C J. Risk factors for dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty. Clinical Ortho Relat Res 2013; 471(2): 410–16.
  • Yoshimoto K, Nakashima Y, Aota S, Kaneuji A, Fukui K, Hirakawa K, Nakura N, Kinoshita K, Naito M, Iwamoto Y. Re-dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty for recurrent dislocation: a multicentre study. Int Orthop 2017; 41(2): 253–8.
  • Zhang D, Chen L, Peng K, Xing F, Wang H, Xiang Z. Effectiveness and safety of the posterior approach with soft tissue repair for primary total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2015; 101(1): 39–44.