Advanced search
Publication Cover
Acta Orthopaedica Volume 89, 2018 - Issue 6
Journal homepage
2,022
Views
23
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research-article

Higher mid-term revision rates of posterior stabilized compared with cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasties: 133,841 cemented arthroplasties for osteoarthritis in the Netherlands in 2007–2016

Anneke Spekenbrink-SpoorenDutch Arthroplasty Register (Landelijke Registratie Orthopedische Implantaten), ’s-Hertogenbosch; Correspondence[email protected]
,
Liza N Van SteenbergenDutch Arthroplasty Register (Landelijke Registratie Orthopedische Implantaten), ’s-Hertogenbosch;
,
Geke A W DenissenDutch Arthroplasty Register (Landelijke Registratie Orthopedische Implantaten), ’s-Hertogenbosch;
,
Bart A SwierstraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen;
,
Rudolf W PoolmanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Joint Research, OLVGAmsterdam;
&
Rob G H H NelissenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
Pages 640-645 | Published online: 23 Oct 2018

  • Abdel M P, Morrey M E, Jensen M R, Morrey B F. Increased long-term survival of posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior cruciate-stabilizing total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93(22): 2072–8.
  • Andersen P K, Geskus R B, de Witte T, Putter H. Competing risks in epidemiology: possibilities and pitfalls. Int J Epidem 2012; 41(3): 861–70.
  • Apold H, Meyer H E, Nordsletten L, Furnes O, Baste V, Flugsrud G B. Risk factors for knee replacement due to primary osteoarthritis, a population based, prospective cohort study of 315,495 individuals. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014; 15: 217.
  • Bayliss L E, Culliford D, Monk A P, Glyn-Jones S, Prieto-Alhambra D, Judge A, Cooper C, Carr A J, Arden N K, Beard D J, Price A J. The effect of patient age at intervention on risk of implant revision after total replacement of the hip or knee: a population-based cohort study. Lancet 2017; 389(10077): 1424–30.
  • Carr A J, Robertsson O, Graves S, Price A J, Arden N K, Judge A, Beard D J. Knee replacement. Lancet 2012; 379(9823): 1331–40.
  • Ethgen O, Bruyere O, Richy F, Dardennes C, Reginster J Y. Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty: a qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86-A(5): 963–74.
  • Gundtoft P H, Overgaard S, Schønheyder H C, Møller J K, Kjaersgaard-Andersen P, Pedersen A B. The “true” incidence of surgically treated deep prosthetic joint infection after 32,896 primary total hip arthroplasties: a prospective cohort study. Acta Orthop 2015; 86(3): 326–34.
  • Hamilton D F, Howie C R, Burnett R, Simpson A H, Patton J T. Dealing with the predicted increase in demand for revision total knee arthroplasty: challenges, risks and opportunities. Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B(6): 723–8.
  • Hardeman F, Londers J, Favril A, Witvrouw E, Bellemans J, Victor J. Predisposing factors which are relevant for the clinical outcome after revision total knee arthroplasty. KSSTA 2012; 20(6): 1049–56.
  • Jacobs W C, Clement D J, Wymenga A B. Retention versus removal of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee replacement: a systematic literature review within the Cochrane framework. Acta Orthop 2005; 76(6): 757–68.
  • Jasper L L, Jones C A, Mollins J, Pohar S L, Beaupre L A. Risk factors for revision of total knee arthroplasty: a scoping review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2016; 17: 182.
  • Kunutsor S K, Whitehouse M R, Blom A W, Beswick A D. Patient-related risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection after total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS One 2016; 11(3): e0150866.
  • Kurtz S M, Lau E, Ong K, Zhao K, Kelly M, Bozic K J. Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: national projections from 2010 to 2030. Clin Orthop Rel Res 2009; 467(10): 2606–12.
  • Lacny S, Wilson T, Clement F, Roberts D J, Faris P D, Ghali W A, Marshall D A. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis overestimates the risk of revision arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Rel Res 2015; 473(11): 3431–42.
  • LROI. LROI Report. 2016: Blik op Uitkomsten [in Dutch]. In: http://wwwlroi-rapportagenl/2016 accessed 10-02-2018 (Eds. Spekenbrink-Spooren A, Van Steenbergen L N, Denissen G A W, Rijnsburger E, Van der Togt C R); 2016.
  • LROI. LROI Report. 2017 (Eds. Spekenbrink-Spooren A, Van Steenbergen L N, Denissen G A W, Rijnsburger E, Van der Togt C R); 2017. http://www.lroi-rapportage.nl/2017.
  • McCalden R W, Robert C E, Howard J L, Naudie D D, McAuley J P, MacDonald S J. Comparison of outcomes and survivorship between patients of different age groups following TKA. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28(8 Suppl): 83–6.
  • Nelissen R G, Brand R, Rozing P M. Survivorship analysis in total condylar knee arthroplasty. A statistical review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992; 74(3): 383–9.
  • Pabinger C, Berghold A, Boehler N, Labek G. Revision rates after knee replacement: cumulative results from worldwide clinical studies versus joint registers. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013;21(2):263–8.
  • Shah S H, Schwartz B E, Schwartz A R, Goldberg B A, Chmell SJ. Total knee arthroplasty in the younger patient. J Knee Surg 2017; 30(6): 555–9.
  • van den Boom L G, Brouwer R W, van den Akker-Scheek I, Bulstra S K, van Raaij J J. Retention of the posterior cruciate ligament versus the posterior stabilized design in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2009; 10: 119.
  • van Steenbergen L N, Denissen G A, Spooren A, van Rooden S M, van Oosterhout F J, Morrenhof J W, Nelissen R G. More than 95% completeness of reported procedures in the population-based Dutch Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2015; 86(4): 498–505.
  • Vektis. http://www.vektis.nl. 2017.
  • Verra W C, Boom L G, Jacobs W C, Schoones J W, Wymenga A B, Nelissen R G. Similar outcome after retention or sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2015; 86(2): 195–201.
  • Vertullo C J, Lewis P L, Lorimer M, Graves S E. The effect on long-term survivorship of surgeon preference for posterior-stabilized or minimally stabilized total knee replacement: an analysis of 63,416 prostheses from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(13):1129–39.
  • Wongworawat M D, Dobbs M B, Gebhardt M C, Gioe T J, Leopold S S, Manner P A, Rimnac C M, Porcher R. Editorial: Estimating survivorship in the face of competing risks. Clin Orthop Rel Res 2015; 473(4): 1173–6.
  • Zmistowski B, Restrepo C, Kahl L K, Parvizi J, Sharkey P F. Incidence and reasons for nonrevision reoperation after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res 2011; 469(1): 138–45.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.