Advanced search
Publication Cover
Acta Orthopaedica Volume 90, 2019 - Issue 4
Journal homepage
3,626
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Patient-reported outcomes in hip resurfacing versus conventional total hip arthroplasty: a register-based matched cohort study of 726 patients

Alexander OxblomDivison of Orthopaedics and Biotechnology, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet;; Correspondence[email protected]
,
Håkan HedlundDivison of Orthopaedics and Biotechnology, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet;; ;Visby Lasarett;;
,
Szilard NemesSwedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Gothenburg;; ;Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg, Sweden
,
Harald BrismarDivison of Orthopaedics and Biotechnology, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet;;
,
Li Felländer-TsaiDivison of Orthopaedics and Biotechnology, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet;;
&
Ola RolfsonSwedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Gothenburg;; ;Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg, Sweden
Pages 318-323 | Published online: 18 Apr 2019

  • Amstutz H C, Le Duff M J. Hip resurfacing: a 40-year perspective. HSS J 2012; 8(3): 275–82.
  • Bengtsson A, Donahue GS, Nemes S, Garellick G, Rolfson O. Consistency in patient-reported outcomes after total hip replacement: a 6-year registry follow-up of 15,755 patients. Acta Orthop 2017; 88(5): 484–9.
  • Cohen D. Out of joint: the story of the ASR. BMJ 2011; 342: d2905.
  • Costa M L, Achten J, Parsons N R, Edlin R P, Foguet P, Prakash U, Griffin D R. Total hip arthroplasty versus resurfacing arthroplasty in the treatment of patients with arthritis of the hip joint: single centre, parallel group, assessor blinded, randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2012; 344: e2147.
  • Costa M L, Achten J, Foguet P, Parsons N R. Comparison of hip function and quality of life of total hip arthroplasty and resurfacing arthroplasty in the treatment of young patients with arthritis of the hip joint at 5 years. BMJ 2018; 8(3): e018849.
  • Daniel J, Pradhan C, Ziaee H, Pynsent P B, McMinn D J W. Results of Birmingham hip resurfacing at 12–15 years: a single-surgeon series. Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B: 1298–306.
  • Del Piccolo N, Carubbi C, Mazzotta A, Sabbioni G, Filanti M, Stagni C, Dallari D. Return to sports activity with short stems or standard stems in total hip arthroplasty in patients less than 50 years old. Hip Int 2016; 26(Suppl. 1): 48–51.
  • De Steiger R N, Hang J R, Miller L N, Graves S E, Davidson D C. Five-year results of the ASR X-large Acetabular System and the ASR Hip Resurfacing System: an analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93(24): 2287–93.
  • EuroQol Group. EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990; 16(3): 199–208.
  • Flugsrud G B, Nordsletten L, Espehaug B, Havelin L I, Meyer H E. The effect of middle-age body weight and physical activity on the risk of early revision hip arthroplasty: a cohort study of 1535 individuals. Acta Orthop 2007; 78(1): 99–107.
  • Fowble V A, dela Rosa M A, Schmalzried T P. A comparison of total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty: patients and outcomes. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 2009; 67(2): 108–12.
  • Garellick G, Kärrholm J, Lindahl H, Malchau H, Mohaddes M, Rogmark C, Rolfson O. Swedish Hip Registry: Annual Report 2015.
  • Girard J, Miletic B, Deny A, Migaud H, Fouilleron N. Can patients return to high-impact physical activities after hip resurfacing? A prospective study. Int Orthop 2013; 37(6): 1019–24.
  • Greenland S, Robins J M, Pearl J. Confounding and collapsibility in causal inference. Stat Sci 1999; 14:29–46.
  • Grigoris P, Roberts P, Panousis K, Jin Z. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: the evolution of contemporary designs. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2006; 220(2): 95–105.
  • Haddad F S, Konan S, Tahmassebi J. A prospective comparative study of cementless total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing in patients under the age of 55 years: a ten-year follow-up. Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B(5): 617–22.
  • Havelin L I, Fenstad A M, Salomonsson R, Mehnert F, Furnes O, Overgaard S, Pedersen A B, Herberts P, Kärrholm J, Garellick G. The Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association: a unique collaboration between 3 national hip arthroplasty registries with 280,201 THRs. Acta Orthop 2009; 80(4): 393–01.
  • Jiang Y, Zhang K, Die J, Shi Z, Zhao H, Wang K. A systematic review of modern metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing vs. standard total hip arthroplasty in active young patients. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26(3): 419–26.
  • Marshall A, Altman D G, Holder R L, Royston P. Combining estimates of interest in prognostic modelling studies after multiple imputation: current practice and guidelines. BMC Med Res Methodol 2009; 9: 57.
  • Matharu G S, McBryde C W, Pynsent W B, Pynsent P B, Treacy R B. The outcome of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing in patients aged < 50 years up to 14 years post-operatively. Bone Joint J 2013; 95-B(9): 1172–7.
  • Mont M A, Marker D R, Smith J M, Ulrich S D, McGrath M S. Resurfacing is comparable to total hip arthroplasty at short-term follow-up. Clin Orthop Rel Res 2009; 467: 66–71.
  • Mäkelä K T, Eskelinen A, Pulkkinen P, Paavolainen P, Remes V. Results of 3,668 primary total hip replacements for primary osteoarthritis in patients under the age of 55 years. Acta Orthop 2011; 82: 521–29.
  • Nemes S, Rolfson O, Garellick G. Development and validation of a shared decision-making instrument for health-related quality of life one year after total hip replacement based on quality registries data. J Eval Clin Pract 2018; 24: 13–21
  • Nilsdotter A K, Lohmander L S, Klassbo M, Roos E M. Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS): validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2003; 4: 10.
  • Ollivier M, Frey S, Parratte S, Flecher X, Argenso J. Does impact sport activity influence total hip arthroplasty durability? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470(11): 3060–6.
  • Ortiz-Declet V R, Iacobelli D A, Yuen L C, Perets I, Chen A W, Domb B G. Birmingham Hip Resurfacing vs. Total Hip Arthroplasty: a matched-pair comparison of clinical outcomes. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32(12): 3647–51.
  • Pollard T C B, Baker R P, Eastaugh-Waring S J, Bannister G C. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip: a 5- to 7-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88-B: 592–600.
  • R Core Team (2017). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Vienna, Austria: Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
  • Reito A, Lehtovirta L, Lainiala O, Mäkelä K, Eskelinen A. Lack of evidence: the anti-stepwise introduction of metal-on-metal hip replacements. Acta Orthop 2017; 88(5): 478–83.
  • Robins J M. Marginal structural models versus structural nested models as tools for causal inference. In: Halloran E, Berry D. Statistical models in epidemiology: the environment and clinical trials. New York, Springer-Verlag; 1999. pp. 95–134.
  • Schmalzried T P, Shepherd E F, Dorey F J, Jackson W O, dela Rosa M, Fa’vae F, McKellop H A, McClung C D, Martell J, Moreland J R, Amstutz H C. The John Charnley Award: Wear is a function of use, not time. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000; (381): 36–46.
  • Schmidutz F, Grote S, Pietschmann M, Weber P, Mazoochian F, Fottner A, Jansson V. Sports activity after short-stem hip arthroplasty. Am J Sports Med 2012; 40(2): 425–32.
  • Scott C E, Bugler K E, Clement N D, MacDonald D, Howie C R, Biant L C. Patient expectations of arthroplasty of the hip and knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012; 94(7): 974–81.
  • Seaman S R, Keogh R H. Handling missing data in matched case-control studies using multiple imputation. Biometrics 2015; 71(4): 1150–9.
  • Sjölander A, Greenland S. Ignoring the matching variables in cohort studies: when is it valid and why? Stat Med 2013; 32: 4696–708.
  • Smith A J, Dieppe P, Vernon K, Porter M, Blom A W; National Joint Registry of England and Wales. Failure rates of stemmed metal-on-metal hip replacements: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry of England and Wales. Lancet 2012; 380(9855): 1759–66.
  • Tan T L, Le Duff M J, Takamura K M, Amstutz H C. Do clinical and quality of life scores change over time after hip resurfacing? Hip Int 2015; 25(2): 146–51.
  • Textor J, Hardt J, Knuppel S. Dagitty: a graphical tool for analyzing causal diagrams. Epidemiology 2011; 22(5):745
  • Vail T P, Mina C A, Yergler J D, Pietrobon R. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compares favorably with THA at 2 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 453: 123–31.
  • Williams D H, Greidanus N V, Masri B A, Duncan C P, Garbuz D S. Predictors of participation in sports after hip and knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470(2): 555–61.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.