2,018
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Survival and revision causes of hip resurfacing arthroplasty and the Mitch proximal epiphyseal replacement: results from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register

, , , &

  • Andersen P K, Keiding N. Interpretability and importance of functionals in competing risks and multistate models. Stat Med 2012; 31(11–12): 1074–88.
  • Austin P C. The use of propensity score methods with survival or time-to-event outcomes: reporting measures of effect similar to those used in randomized experiments. Stat Med 2014; 33(7): 1242–58.
  • Australian Orthopaedic Association. Austrialian National Joint Replacement Registry Annual Report; 2017.
  • Cooper H J, Della Valle C J. Large diameter femoral heads: is bigger always better? Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B(11 Suppl. A): 23–6.
  • Danish Arthroplasty Registry. Danish Annual Report 2018; 2018.
  • de Steiger R N, Hang J R, Miller L N, Graves S E, Davidson D C. Five-year results of the ASR XL Acetabular System and the ASR Hip Resurfacing System: an analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93(24): 2287–93.
  • Deleuran T, Vilstrup H, Overgaard S, Jepsen P. Cirrhosis patients have increased risk of complications after hip or knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2015; 86(1): 108–13.
  • Gillam M H, Ryan P, Graves S E, Miller L N, de Steiger R N, Salter A. Competing risks survival analysis applied to data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Acta Orthop 2010; 81(5): 548–55.
  • Gundtoft P H, Pedersen A B, Schonheyder H C, Overgaard S. Validation of the diagnosis “prosthetic joint infection” in the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Bone Joint J 2016; 98-B(3): 320–5.
  • Johnsen S P, Sorensen H T, Lucht U, Soballe K, Overgaard S, Pedersen A B. Patient-related predictors of implant failure after primary total hip replacement in the initial, short- and long-terms: a nationwide Danish follow-up study including 36,984 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88(10): 1303–8.
  • Klein J P, Logan B, Harhoff M, Andersen P K. Analyzing survival curves at a fixed point in time. Stat Med 2007; 26(24): 4505–19.
  • Kostensalo I, Junnila M, Virolainen P, Remes V, Matilainen M, Vahlberg T, Pulkkinen P, Eskelinen A, Makela K T. Effect of femoral head size on risk of revision for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: a population-based analysis of 42,379 primary procedures from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2013; 84(4): 342–7.
  • Lacny S, Wilson T, Clement F, Roberts D J, Faris P D, Ghali W A, Marshall D A. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis overestimates the risk of revision arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473(11): 3431–42.
  • Langton D J, Joyce T J, Jameson S S, Lord J, Van Orsouw M, Holland J P, Nargol A V, De Smet K A. Adverse reaction to metal debris following hip resurfacing: the influence of component type, orientation and volumetric wear. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93(2): 164–71.
  • Marshall D A, Pykerman K, Werle J, Lorenzetti D, Wasylak T, Noseworthy T, Dick D A, O’Connor G, Sundaram A, Heintzbergen S, Frank C. Hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review comparing standardized outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472(7): 2217–30.
  • Martelli S, Taddei F, Cristofolini L, Schileo E, Rushton N, Viceconti M. A new hip epiphyseal prosthesis: design revision driven by a validated numerical procedure. Med Eng Phys 2011; 33(10): 1203–11.
  • National Joint Registry. National Annual Report 2017; 2017.
  • Pandit H, Glyn-Jones S, McLardy-Smith P, Gundle R, Whitwell D, Gibbons C L, Ostlere S, Athanasou N, Gill H S, Murray D W. Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90(7): 847–51.
  • Parner E T, Andersen P K. Regression analysis of censored data using pseudo-observations. Stata J 2010; 10(3): 408–22.
  • Pedersen A, Johnsen S, Overgaard S, Soballe K, Sorensen H T, Lucht U. Registration in the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Registry: completeness of total hip arthroplasties and positive predictive value of registered diagnosis and postoperative complications. Acta Orthop Scand 2004; 75(4): 434–41.
  • Ranstam J, Karrholm J, Pulkkinen P, Makela K, Espehaug B, Pedersen A B, Mehnert F, Furnes O, group N s. Statistical analysis of arthroplasty data, II: Guidelines. Acta Orthop 2011; 82(3): 258–67.
  • Schmidt M, Pedersen L, Sorensen H T. The Danish Civil Registration System as a tool in epidemiology. Eur J Epidemiol 2014; 29(8): 541–9.
  • Schmidt M, Schmidt S A, Sandegaard J L, Ehrenstein V, Pedersen L, Sorensen H T. The Danish National Patient Registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential. Clin Epidemiol 2015; 7: 449–90.
  • Smith A J, Dieppe P, Howard P W, Blom A W, National Joint Registry for E, Wales. Failure rates of metal-on-metal hip resurfacings: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Lancet 2012; 380(9855): 1759–66.
  • Thygesen S K, Christiansen C F, Christensen S, Lash T L, Sorensen H T. The predictive value of ICD-10 diagnostic coding used to assess Charlson comorbidity index conditions in the population-based Danish National Registry of Patients. BMC Med Res Methodol 2011; 11: 83.