Advanced search
Publication Cover
Acta Orthopaedica Volume 91, 2020 - Issue 3
Journal homepage
2,030
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

How do EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L compare in a Swedish total hip replacement population?

Ted EneqvistSwedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Gothenburg; ;Department of Orthopedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, the Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg;; ;Department of Orthopedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital Gothenburg; Correspondence[email protected]
,
Szilárd NemesSwedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Gothenburg; ;Department of Orthopedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, the Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg;;
,
Johan KärrholmSwedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Gothenburg; ;Department of Orthopedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, the Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg;; ;Department of Orthopedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital Gothenburg;
,
Kristina BurströmHealth Outcomes and Economic Evaluation Research Group, Stockholm Centre for Healthcare Ethics, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm; ;Equity and Health Policy Research Group, Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm; ;Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
&
Ola RolfsonSwedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Gothenburg; ;Department of Orthopedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, the Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg;; ;Department of Orthopedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital Gothenburg; ;Health Outcomes and Economic Evaluation Research Group, Stockholm Centre for Healthcare Ethics, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm;
Pages 272-278 | Published online: 02 Apr 2020

  • Anakwe R E, Jenkins P J, Moran M. Predicting dissatisfaction after total hip arthroplasty: a study of 850 patients. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26(2): 209–13.
  • Bland J M, Altman D G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Int J Nurs Stud 2010; 47(8): 931–6.
  • Buchholz I, Janssen M F, Kohlmann T, Feng Y-S. A systematic review of studies comparing the measurement properties of the three-level and five-level versions of the EQ-5D. PharmacoEconomics 2018; 36(6):645–66.
  • Burstrom K, Sun S, Gerdtham U-G, Henriksson M, Johannesson M, Levin L-A, Zethraeus N. Swedish experience-based value sets for EQ-5D health states (Report) (Author abstract). Qual Life Res 2014; 23(2): 431.
  • Clement N D, Muzammil A, Macdonald D, Howie C R, Biant L C. Socioeconomic status affects the early outcome of total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93(4): 464.
  • Conner-Spady B L, Marshall D A, Bohm E, Dunbar M J, Loucks L, Al Khudairy A, Noseworthy T W. Reliability and validity of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L in patients with osteoarthritis referred for hip and knee replacement. Qual Life Res 2015; 24(7): 1775–84.
  • Craig B M, Pickard A S, Lubetkin E I. More common, but less severe: differences between EQ-5D 3-level, youth, and 5-level versions. J Clin Epidemiol 2014; 67(1): 93–9.
  • Devlin N J, Parkin D, Browne J. Patient–reported outcome measures in the NHS: new methods for analysing and reporting EQ–5D data. Health Econ 2010; 19(8): 886–905.
  • Devlin N J, Krabbe P F M. The development of new research methods for the valuation of EQ-5D-5L. Eur J Health Econ 2013; 14(Suppl 1): S1.
  • Devlin N J, Shah K K, Feng Y, Mulhern B, van Hout B. Valuing health-related quality of life: an EQ-5D-5L value set for England. Health Econ 2018; 27(1): 7–22.
  • Golicki D, Niewada M, Buczek J, KarliAska A, Kobayashi A, Janssen M F, Pickard A S. Validity of EQ-5D-5L in stroke. Qual Life Res 2015; 24(4): 845.
  • Greene M E, Rader K A, Garellick G, Malchau H, Freiberg A A, Rolfson O. The EQ-5D-5L improves on the EQ-5D-3L for health-related quality-of-life assessment in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473(11): 3383.
  • Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, Bonsel G, Badia X. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res 2011; 20(10): 1727.
  • Hinz A, Kohlmann T, Stöbel-Richter Y, Zenger M, Brähler E. The quality of life questionnaire EQ-5D-5L: psychometric properties and normative values for the general German population. Qual Life Res 2014; 23(2): 443–7.
  • Janssen M F, Birnie E, Haagsma J A, Bonsel G J. Comparing the standard EQ–5D three–level system with a five–level version. Value Health 2008; 11(2): 275–84.
  • Janssen M F, Pickard A S, Golicki D, Gudex C, Niewada M, Scalone L, Swinburn P, Busschbach J. Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country study. Qual Life Res 2013; 22(7): 1717.
  • Kärrholm J, Mohaddes M, Odin D, Vinblad J, Rogmark C, Rolfson O. The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register Annual Report 2017 [Internet]. The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register; 2018. Available from: http://refdocs.registercentrum.se/10.18158/BkOffx7U4
  • Lawless B, Greene M, Slover J, Kwon Y-M, Malchau H. Does age or bilateral disease influence the value of hip arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470(4): 1073–8.
  • Leidl R, Reitmeir P. An experience-based value set for the EQ-5D-5L in Germany. Value Health 2017; 20(8): 1150–6.
  • Lim C R, Harris K, Dawson J, Beard D J, Fitzpatrick R, Price A J. Floor and ceiling effects in the OHS: an analysis of the NHS PROMs data set. BMJ Open 2015; 5(7): e007765.
  • LROI. Annual report Dutch Arthroplasty Register. [Annual report]; 2016.
  • Myers J L, Well A D. Research design and statistical analysis, 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2003. p 508.
  • Oppe M, Devlin N J, van Hout B, Krabbe P F, de Charro F. A program of methodological research to arrive at the new international EQ-5D-5L valuation protocol. Value Health 2014; 17(4) (445–453).
  • Pickard S A, De Leon C M, Kohlmann C T, Cella C D, Rosenbloom C S. Psychometric comparison of the standard EQ-5D to a 5 level version in cancer patients. Med Care 2007; 45(3): 259–63.
  • Rabin R, Charro F D. EQ-SD: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med 2001; 33(5): 337–43.
  • Rolfson O, Karrholm J, Dahlberg L E, Garellick G. Patient-reported outcomes in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register: results of a nationwide prospective observational study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93(7): 867–75.
  • Scalone L, Ciampichini R, Fagiuoli S, Gardini I, Fusco F, Gaeta L, Del Prete A, Cesana G, Mantovani L G. Comparing the performance of the standard EQ-5D 3L with the new version EQ-5D 5L in patients with chronic hepatic diseases. Qual Life Res 2013; 22(7): 1707–16.
  • Sullivan W P, Lawrence F W, Ghushchyan F V. A national catalog of preference-based scores for chronic conditions in the United States. Med Care 2005; 43(7): 736–49.
  • Wolfe F, Hawley D J. Measurement of the quality of life in rheumatic disorders using the EuroQol. Rheumatol 1997; 36(7): 786–93.rheumatology/36.7.786.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.