Advanced search
Publication Cover
Acta Orthopaedica Volume 91, 2020 - Issue 4
Journal homepage
1,965
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Is there a reduction in risk of revision when 36-mm heads instead of 32 mm are used in total hip arthroplasty for patients with proximal femur fractures?

A matched analysis of 5,030 patients with a median of 2.5 years’ follow-up between 2006 and 2016 in the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association

Georgios TsikandylakisDepartment of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg; ;The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Gothenburg, Sweden; ;Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Dept of Orthopaedics, Gothenburg, Sweden; Correspondence[email protected]
,
Johan N KärrholmDepartment of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg; ;The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Gothenburg, Sweden; ;Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Dept of Orthopaedics, Gothenburg, Sweden;
,
Geir HallanThe Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Norway; ;Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Norway;
,
Ove FurnesThe Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Norway; ;Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Norway;
,
Antti EskelinenCoxa Hospital of Joint Replacement, Tampere Finland; ;The Finnish Arthroplasty Register, Finland;
,
Keijo MäkeläThe Finnish Arthroplasty Register, Finland; ;Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Turku University Hospital, Finland;
,
Alma B PedersenDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; ;The Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Denmark;
,
Søren OvergaardThe Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Denmark; ;Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark; ;Institute of Clinical Research, University of SouthernDenmark
&
Maziar MohaddesDepartment of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg; ;The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Gothenburg, Sweden; ;Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Dept of Orthopaedics, Gothenburg, Sweden;
show all
Pages 401-407 | Published online: 14 Apr 2020

  • Austin P C. Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies. Pharm Stat 2011; 10(2): 150–61.
  • Berry D J, von Knoch M, Schleck C D, Harmsen W S. Effect of femoral head diameter and operative approach on risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87(11): 2456–63 .
  • Burgers P T P W, Van Geene A R, Van den Bekerom M P J, Van Lieshout E M M, Blom B, Aleem I S, Bhandari M, Poolman R W. Total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in the healthy elderly: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized trials. Int Orthop 2012; 36(8): 1549–60.
  • Burroughs B R, Hallstrom B, Golladay G J, Hoeffel D, Harris W H. Range of motion and stability in total hip arthroplasty with 28-, 32-, 38-, and 44-mm femoral head sizes. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20(1): 11–19 .
  • Cebatorius A, Robertsson O, Stucinskas J, Smailys A, Leonas L, Tarasevicius S. Choice of approach, but not femoral head size, affects revision rate due to dislocations in THA after femoral neck fracture: results from the Lithuanian Arthroplasty Register. Int Orthop 2015; 39(6): 1073–6.
  • Conroy J L, Whitehouse S L, Graves S E, Pratt N L, Ryan P, Crawford R W. Risk factors for revision for early dislocation in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2008; 23(6): 867–72.
  • Hailer N P, Weiss R J, Stark A, Karrholm J. The risk of revision due to dislocation after total hip arthroplasty depends on surgical approach, femoral head size, sex, and primary diagnosis: an analysis of 78,098 operations in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2012; 83(5): 442–8.
  • Havelin L I, Robertsson O, Fenstad A M, Overgaard S, Garellick G, Furnes O. A Scandinavian experience of register collaboration: the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA). J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93(Suppl. 3): 13–9.
  • Jameson S S, Kyle J, Baker P N, Mason J, Deehan D J, McMurtry I A, Reed M R. Patient and implant survival following 4323 total hip replacements for acute femoral neck fracture: a retrospective cohort study using National Joint Registry data. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012; 94(11): 1557–66.
  • Jobory A, Karrholm J, Overgaard S, Becic Pedersen A, Hallan G, Gjertsen J E, Makela K, Rogmark C. Reduced revision risk for Dual-Mobility Cup in total hip replacement due to hip fracture: a matched-air analysis of 9,040 cases from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA). J Bone Joint Surg Am 2019; 101(14): 1278–85 .
  • Johansson T. Internal fixation compared with total hip replacement for displaced femoral neck fractures: a minimum fifteen-year follow-up study of a previously reported randomized trial J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96(6): e46.
  • Kostensalo I, Junnila M, Virolainen P, Remes V, Matilainen M, Vahlberg T, Pulkkinen P, Eskelinen A, Makela K T. Effect of femoral head size on risk of revision for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: a population-based analysis of 42,379 primary procedures from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2013; 84(4): 342–7.
  • Kuss O, Blettner M, Börgermann J. Propensity score: an alternative method of analyzing treatment effects. Deutsches Arzteblatt Int 2016; 113(35-36): 597–603.
  • Mjaaland K E, Svenningsen S, Fenstad A M, Havelin L I, Furnes O, Nordsletten L. Implant survival after minimally invasive anterior or anterolateral vs conventional posterior or direct lateral approach: an analysis of 21,860 total hip arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (2008 to 2013). J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017; 99(10): 840–7.
  • Noticewala M, Murtaugh T S, Danoff J, Cunn G J, Shah R P, Geller J. Has the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty performed for displaced femoral neck fracture improved with modern implants? J Clin Orthop Trauma 2018; 9(4): 281–4.
  • Peters R M, van Steenbergen L N, Stewart R E, Stevens M, Rijk P C, Bulstra S K, Zijlstra W P. Patient characteristics influence revision rate of total hip arthroplasty: American Society of Anesthesiologists score and body mass index were the strongest predictors for short-term revision after primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2020; 35(1): 188–92.
  • Ranstam J, Kärrholm J, Pulkkinen P, Mäkelä K, Espehaug B, Pedersen A B, Mehnert F, Furnes O, group, NARA Srudy Group. Statistical analysis of arthroplasty data II Guidelines. Acta Orthop 2011; 82(3): 258–67.
  • Rogmark C, Möller M, Sundfeldt M, Wolf O. The Swedish Fracture Register Annual Report 2016; 2017, https://stratum registercentrumse/Handlers/ResourceManagerashx?ID=32491. Accessed December 6, 2018.
  • Sariali E, Lazennec J Y, Khiami F, Catonne Y. Mathematical evaluation of jumping distance in total hip arthroplasty: influence of abduction angle, femoral head offset, and head diameter. Acta Orthop 2009; 80(3): 277–82.
  • Tabori-Jensen S, Hansen T B, Stilling M. Low dislocation rate of Saturne((R))/Avantage((R)) dual-mobility THA after displaced femoral neck fracture: a cohort study of 966 hips with a minimum 16-year follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2019; 139(5): 605–12.
  • Tsikandylakis G, Karrholm J, Hailer N P, Eskelinen A, Makela K T, Hallan G, Furnes O N, Pedersen A B, Overgaard S, Mohaddes M. No increase in survival for 36-mm versus 32-mm femoral heads in metal-on-polyethylene THA: a registry study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2018a; 476(12): 2367–78.
  • Tsikandylakis G, Mohaddes M, Cnudde P, Eskelinen A, Karrholm J, Rolfson O. Head size in primary total hip arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev 2018b; 3(5): 225–31.
  • Tsuda K, Haraguchi K, Koyanagi J, Takahashi S, Sugama R, Fujiwara K. A forty millimetre head significantly improves range of motion compared with a twenty eight millimetre head in total hip arthroplasty using a computed tomography-based navigation system. Int Orthop 2016; 40(10): 2031–9.
  • Zijlstra W P, De Hartog B, Van Steenbergen L N, Scheurs B W, Nelissen R. Effect of femoral head size and surgical approach on risk of revision for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2017; 88(4): 395–401.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.