Advanced search
Publication Cover
Acta Orthopaedica Volume 91, 2020 - Issue 6
Journal homepage
1,399
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Does cup position differ between trabecular metal and titanium cups? A radiographic propensity score matched study of 300 hips

Inari Laaksonena Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland, Finnish Arthroplasty Register, Helsinki, Finland;Correspondence[email protected]
,
Natalie Hjelmbergb Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Surgical Sciences, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
,
Kirill Gromovc Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark;d Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Aarhus, Denmark
,
Antti E Eskelinene Coxa Hospital for Joint Replacement, Tampere, Finland, Finnish Arthroplasty Register, Helsinki, Finland;
,
Ola Rolfsonb Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Surgical Sciences, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
,
Henrik Malchaub Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Surgical Sciences, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden;f Harris Orthopedic Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
,
Anders Troelsenc Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark
,
Keijo T Mäkeläa Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland, Finnish Arthroplasty Register, Helsinki, Finland;
&
Maziar Mohaddesb Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Surgical Sciences, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
 show all
Pages 682-686 | Published online: 03 Jul 2020

  • AOANJRR. Annual report 2017. https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/annual-reports-2017 [accessed January 6, 2020].
  • Baad-Hansen T, Kold S, Nielsen P T, Laursen M B, Christensen P H, Soballe K. Comparison of trabecular metal cups and titanium fiber-mesh cups in primary hip arthroplasty: a randomized RSA and bone mineral densitometry study of 50 hips. Acta Orthop 2011; 82(2): 155–60.
  • Beckmann N A, Weiss S, Klotz M C M, Gondan M, Jaeger S, Bitsch R G. Loosening after acetabular revision: comparison of trabecular metal and reinforcement rings. A systematic review. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29(1): 229–35.
  • Biedermann R, Tonin A, Krismer M, Rachbauer F, Eibl G, Stöckl B. Reducing the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: the effect of orientation of the acetabular component. Bone Joint J 2005; 87(6): 762–9.
  • Bobyn J D, Stackpool G J, Hacking S A, Tanzer M, Krygier J J. Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial. J Bone Joint Surg 1999; 81(5): 907–14.
  • Callanan M C, Jarrett B, Bragdon C R, Zurakowski D, Rubash H E, Freiberg A A, Malchau H. The John Charnley Award: Risk factors for cup malpositioning: quality improvement through a joint registry at a tertiary hospital. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469: 319–29.
  • Cotong D, Troelsen A, Husted H, Gromov K. Danish survey of acetabular component positioning practice during primary total hip arthroplasty. Dan Med J 2017; 64(4): A5354.
  • Danoff J R, Bobman J T, Cunn G, Murtaugh T, Gorroochurn P, Geller J A, Macaulay W. Redefining the acetabular component safe zone for posterior approach total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31(2): 506–11.
  • Elson L, Dounchis J, Illgen R, Marchand R C, E Padgett D E, Bragdon C R, Malchau H. Precision of acetabular cup placement in robotic integrated total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int 2015; 25(6): 531–6.
  • Ezquerra L, Quilez M P, Pérez M Á, Albareda J, Seral B. Range of movement for impingement and dislocation avoidance in total hip replacement predicted by finite element model. J Med Biol Eng 2017; 37(1): 26–34.
  • Finnish Arthroplasty Register (FAR). Finnish arthroplasty register [Internet] 2017. Available from: www.thl.fi/far [accessed January 6, 2020].
  • Hailer N P, Weiss R J, Stark A, Kärrholm J. The risk of revision due to dislocation after total hip arthroplasty depends on surgical approach, femoral head size, sex, and primary diagnosis. Acta Orthop 2012; 83(5): 442–8.
  • Hemmilä M, Karvonen M, Laaksonen I, Matilainen M, Eskelinen A, Haapakoski J, Puhto A P, Kettunen J, Manninen M, Mäkela K T. Survival of 11,390 Continuum cups in primary total hip arthroplasty based on data from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2019; 90(4): 312–17.
  • Jafari S M, Bender B, Coyle C, Parvizi J, Sharkey P F, Hozack W J. Do tantalum and titanium cups show similar results in revision hip arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468(2): 459–65.
  • Laaksonen I, Lorimer M, Gromov K, Rolfson O, Mäkelä K T, Graves S E, Malchau H, Mohaddes M. Does the risk of rerevision vary between porous tantalum cups and other cementless designs after revision hip arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017; 475(12): 3015–22.
  • Laaksonen I, Lorimer M, Gromov K, Eskelinen A, Rolfson O, Graves S E, Malchau H, Mohaddes M. Trabecular metal acetabular components in primary total hip arthroplasty:h risk for revision compared with other uncemented cup designs in a collaborative register study including 93,709 hips. Acta Orthop 2018; 89(3): 259–64.
  • Lewinnek G E, Lewis J L, Tarr R, Compere C L, Zimmerman J R. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978; 60(2): 217–20.
  • Martell J M, Berdia S. Determination of polyethylene wear in total hip replacements with use of digital radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997; 79(11): 1635–41.
  • Matharu G S, Judge A, Murray D W, Pandit H G. Trabecular metal acetabular components reduce the risk of revision following primary total hip arthroplasty: a propensity score matched study from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. J Arthroplasty 2018a; 33(2): 447–52.
  • Matharu G S, Judge A, Murray D W, Pandit H G. Do trabecular metal acetabular components reduce the risk of rerevision after revision THA performed for periprosthetic joint infection? A study using the NJR data set. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2019; 477(6): 1382–9.
  • Mohaddes M, Rolfson O, Kärrholm J. Short-term survival of the trabecular metal cup is similar to that of standard cups used in acetabular revision surgery. Acta Orthop 2015; 86(1): 26–31.
  • Sariali E, Lazennec J Y, Khiami F, Catonné Y. Mathematical evaluation of jumping distance in total hip arthroplasty: iInfluence of abduction angle, femoral head offset, and head diameter. Acta Orthop 2009; 80(3): 277–82.
  • Seagrave K G, Troelsen A, Madsen B G, Husted H, Kallemose T, Gromov K. Can surgeons reduce the risk for dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty performed using the posterolateral approach? J Arthroplasty 2017a; 32(10): 3141–6.
  • Seagrave K G, Troelsen A, Malchau H, Husted H, Gromov K. Acetabular cup position and risk of dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2017b; 88(1): 10–17.
  • Tokarski A T, Novack T A, Parvizi J. Is tantalum protective against infection in revision total hip arthroplasty? Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B(1): 45–9.
  • Wegrzyn J, Kaufman K R, Hanssen A D, Lewallen D G. Performance of porous tantalum vs. titanium cup in total hip arthroplasty: randomized trial with minimum 10-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30(6): 1008–13.
  • Zijlstra W P, De Hartog B, Van Steenbergen L N, Scheurs B W, Nelissen R G H H. Effect of femoral head size and surgical approach on risk of revision for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2017; 88(4): 395–401.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.