2,301
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Custom-made 3D-printed cup-cage implants for complex acetabular revisions: evaluation of pre-planned versus achieved positioning and 1-year migration data in 10 patients

&

  • Abolghasemian M , Sadeghi Naini M , Tangsataporn S , Lee P , Backstein D , Safir O , Kuzyk P , Gross A E . Reconstruction of massive uncontained acetabular defects using allograft with cage or ring reinforcement: an assessment of the graft’s ability to restore bone stock and its impact on the outcome of re-revision. Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B(3): 319–24.
  • Baauw M , van Hellemondt G G , van Hooff M L , Spruit M . The accuracy of positioning of a custom-made implant within a large acetabular defect at revision arthroplasty of the hip. Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B(6): 780–5.
  • Baauw M , van Hellemondt G G , Spruit M . A custom-made acetabular implant for Paprosky Type 3 defects. Orthopedics 2017; 40(1): e195–e8.
  • Bonnomet F , Clavert P , Gicquel P , Lefebvre Y , Kempf J F . [Reconstruction by graft and reinforcement device in severe aseptic acetabular loosening: 10 years survivorship analysis]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2001; 87(2): 135–46.
  • Buttaro M A , Comba F , Pusso R , Piccaluga F . Acetabular revision with metal mesh, impaction bone grafting, and a cemented cup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 466(10): 2482–90.
  • Chiarlone F , Zanirato A , Cavagnaro L , Alessio-Mazzola M , Felli L , Burastero G . Acetabular custom-made implants for severe acetabular bone defect in revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2020; 140(3): 415–24.
  • Choi H R , Anderson D , Foster S , Beal M , Lee J A , Barr C , Malchau H , McCarthy J , Kwon Y M . Acetabular cup positioning in revision total hip arthroplasty with Paprosky type III acetabular defects: Martell radiographic analysis. Int Orthop 2013; 37(10): 1905–10.
  • Citak M , Kochsiek L , Gehrke T , Haasper C , Suero E M , Mau H . Preliminary results of a 3D-printed acetabular component in the management of extensive defects. Hip Int 2018; 28(3): 266–71.
  • Colen S , Harake R , De Haan J , Mulier M . A modified custom-made triflanged acetabular reconstruction ring (MCTARR) for revision hip arthroplasty with severe acetabular defects. Acta Orthop Belg 2013; 79(1): 71–5.
  • DeBoer D K , Christie M J , Brinson M F , Morrison J C . Revision total hip arthroplasty for pelvic discontinuity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89(4): 835–40.
  • Del Gaizo D J , Kancherla V , Sporer S M , Paprosky W G . Tantalum augments for Paprosky IIIA defects remain stable at midterm followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470(2): 395–401.
  • Gelaude F , Clijmans T , Delport H . Quantitative computerized assessment of the degree of acetabular bone deficiency: total radial acetabular bone loss (TrABL). Adv Orthop 2011; 2011: 494382.
  • Gilbody J , Taylor C , Bartlett G E , Whitehouse S L , Hubble M J , Timperley A J , Howell J R , Wilson M J . Clinical and radiographic outcomes of acetabular impaction grafting without cage reinforcement for revision hip replacement: a minimum ten-year follow-up study. Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B(2): 188–94.
  • Goriainov V , McEwan J K , Oreffo R O , Dunlop D G . Application of 3D-printed patient-specific skeletal implants augmented with autologous skeletal stem cells. Regen Med 2018; 13(3): 283–94.
  • Karrholm J , Borssen B , Lowenhielm G , Snorrason F . Does early micromotion of femoral stem prostheses matter? 4-7-year stereoradiographic follow-up of 84 cemented prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1994; 76(6): 912–7.
  • Lopez T II , Sanz-Ruiz P , Sanchez-Perez C , Andrade-Albarracin R , Vaquero J . Clinical and radiological outcomes of trabecular metal systems and antiprotrusion cages in acetabular revision surgery with severe defects: a comparative study. Int Orthop 2018; 42(8): 1811–18.
  • Macheras G , Kateros K , Kostakos A , Koutsostathis S , Danomaras D , Papagelopoulos P J . Eight- to ten-year clinical and radiographic outcome of a porous tantalum monoblock acetabular component. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24(5): 705–9.
  • Myncke I , van Schaik D , Scheerlinck T . Custom-made triflanged acetabular components in the treatment of major acetabular defects: short-term results and clinical experience. Acta Orthop Belg 2017; 83(3): 341–50.
  • Nieuwenhuijse M J , Valstar E R , Kaptein B L , Nelissen R G . The Exeter femoral stem continues to migrate during its first decade after implantation: 10-12 years of follow-up with radiostereometric analysis (RSA). Acta Orthop 2012; 83(2): 129–34.
  • Paprosky W G , Perona P G , Lawrence J M . Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty: a 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 1994; 9(1): 33–44.
  • Pijls B G , Nieuwenhuijse M J , Fiocco M , Plevier J W , Middeldorp S , Nelissen R G , Valstar E R . Early proximal migration of cups is associated with late revision in THA: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 26 RSA studies and 49 survival studies. Acta Orthop 2012; 83(6): 583–91.
  • Ranstam J , Ryd L , Onsten I . Accurate accuracy assessment: review of basic principles. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71(1): 106–8.
  • Sheth N P , Nelson C L , Springer B D , Fehring T K , Paprosky W G . Acetabular bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2013; 21(3): 128–39.
  • Slooff T J , Schimmel J W , Buma P . Cemented fixation with bone grafts. Orthop Clin North Am 1993; 24(4): 667–77.
  • Taunton M J , Fehring T K , Edwards P , Bernasek T , Holt G E , Christie M J . Pelvic discontinuity treated with custom triflange component: a reliable option. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470(2): 428–34.
  • Templeton J E , Callaghan J J , Goetz D D , Sullivan P M , Johnston R C . Revision of a cemented acetabular component to a cementless acetabular component: a ten to fourteen-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83(11): 1706–11.
  • Theil C , Schmidt-Braekling T , Gosheger G , Moellenbeck B , Schwarze J , Dieckmann R . A single centre study of 41 cases on the use of porous tantalum metal implants in acetabular revision surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2019; 20(1): 238.
  • van Egmond N , De Kam D C , Gardeniers J W , Schreurs B W . Revisions of extensive acetabular defects with impaction grafting and a cement cup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469(2): 562–73.
  • van Haaren E H , Heyligers I C , Alexander F G , Wuisman P I . High rate of failure of impaction grafting in large acetabular defects. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89(3): 296–300.
  • Weeden S H , Schmidt R H . The use of tantalum porous metal implants for Paprosky 3A and 3B defects. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22(6 Suppl. 2): 151–5.
  • Whitehouse M R , Masri B A , Duncan C P , Garbuz D S . Continued good results with modular trabecular metal augments for acetabular defects in hip arthroplasty at 7 to 11 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473(2): 521–7.
  • Wind M A Jr , Swank M L , Sorger J I . Short-term results of a custom triflange acetabular component for massive acetabular bone loss in revision THA. Orthopedics 2013; 36(3): e260-5.