1,580
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Low revision rate of dual mobility cups after arthroplasty for acute hip fractures: report of 11,857 hip fractures in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (2007–2019)

, &

  • Bloemheuvel E M , van Steenbergen L N , Swierstra B A. Dual mobility cups in primary total hip arthroplasties: trend over time in use, patient characteristics, and mid-term revision in 3,308 cases in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (2007-2016). Acta Orthop 2019; 90(1): 11–14.
  • Byström S , Espehaug B , Furnes O , Havelin LI , Norwegian Arthroplasty Register . Femoral head size is a risk factor for total hip luxation: a study of 42,987 primary hip arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop Scand 2003; 74(5): 514–24.
  • Enocson A , Hedbeck C J , Tidermark J , Pettersson H , Ponzer S , Lapidus L J. Dislocation of total hip replacement in patients with fractures of the femoral neck. Acta Orthop 2009; 80(2): 184–9.
  • Gjertsen J E , Lie S A , Fevang J M , Havelin L I , Engesaeter L B , Vinje T , Furnes O. Total hip replacement after femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: results of 8,577 fractures reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2007; 78(4): 491–7.
  • Hailer N P , Weiss R J , Stark A , Kärrholm J. The risk of revision due to dislocation after total hip arthroplasty depends on surgical approach, femoral head size, sex, and primary diagnosis: an analysis of 78,098 operations in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2012; 83(5): 442–8.
  • Jobory A , Kärrholm J , Overgaard S , Pedersen A B , Halan G , Gjertsen J , Maela K , Rogmark C. Reduced revision risk for dual-mobility cup in total hip replacement due to hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2019; 101: 1278–85.
  • Kostensalo I , Junnila A. Virolainen P. Effect of femoral head size on risk of revision for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2013; 84(4): 342–7.
  • Lacny S , Wilson T , Clement F , Roberts D J , Faris P D , Ghali W A , Marshall D A. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis overestimates the risk of revision arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473(11): 3431–42.
  • LROI . Annual report 2018. Available from www.lroi-report.nl.
  • Moerman S , Mathijsen N M C , Tuinebrijer W E , Vochteloo A J H , Nelissen R G H H. Hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty in 30,380 patients with hip fractures: data from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register on revision and risk factors for revision. Acta Orthop 2018; 89(5): 509–14.
  • Parker M J , Gurusamy K S , Azegami S. Arthroplasties (with and without bone cement) for proximal femoral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; (6): CD001706.
  • Tabori-Jensen S , Hansen T B , Stilling M. Low dislocation rate of Saturne®/Avantage® dual-mobility THA after displaced femoral neck fracture: a cohort study of 966 hips with a minimum 1.6-year follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2019; 139(5): 605–12.
  • Vektis (www.vektis.nl)
  • Wongworawat M D , Dobbs M B , Gebhardt M C , Gioe T J , Leopold S S , Manner P A , Rimnac C M , Porcher R. Editorial: Estimating survivorship in the face of competing risk. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473: 1173–6.
  • Zijlstra W P , De Hartog B , van Steenbergen L N , Scheurs B M , Nelissen R G H H. Effect of femoral head size and surgical approach on risk of revision for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2017; 88(4): 395–401.