Advanced search
Publication Cover
Acta Orthopaedica Volume 92, 2021 - Issue 6
Journal homepage
1,989
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

A matched comparison of the patient-reported outcome measures of 38,716 total and unicompartmental knee replacements: an analysis of linked data from the National Joint Registry of England, Northern Ireland and Isle of Man and England’s National PROM collection programme

Hasan R Mohammada Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK;b Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Level 1 Learning and Research Building, Southmead Hospital, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol, UKCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Andrew Judgea Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK;b Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Level 1 Learning and Research Building, Southmead Hospital, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol, UK
&
David W Murraya Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Pages 701-708 | Published online: 26 Jul 2021

  • Austin P C. Some methods of propensity–score matching had superior performance to others: results of an empirical investigation and Monte Carlo simulations. Biom J 2009a; 51(1): 171–84.
  • Austin P C. Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity–score matched samples. Stat Med 2009b; 28(25): 3083–107.
  • Australian Orthopaedic Association. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). Hip, Knee & Shoulder Arthroplasty 2019.
  • Baker P, Petheram T, Jameson S, Avery P, Reed M, Gregg P, Deehan D. Comparison of patient-reported outcome measures following total and unicondylar knee replacement. Bone Joint J 2012; 94(7): 919–27.
  • Beard D J, Harris K, Dawson J, Doll H, Murray D W, Carr A J, Price A J. Meaningful changes for the Oxford hip and knee scores after joint replacement surgery. J Clin Epidemiol 2015; 68(1): 73–9.
  • Beard D J, Davies L J, Cook J A, MacLennan G, Price A, Kent S, Hudson J, Carr A, Leal J, Campbell H. The clinical and cost-effectiveness of total versus partial knee replacement in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis (TOPKAT): 5-year outcomes of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2019; 394(10200): 746–56.
  • Beswick A D, Wylde V, Gooberman-Hill R, Blom A, Dieppe P. What proportion of patients report long-term pain after total hip or knee replacement for osteoarthritis? A systematic review of prospective studies in unselected patients. BMJ Open 2012; 2(1).
  • Breeman S, Campbell M, Dakin H, Fiddian N, Fitzpatrick R, Grant A, Gray A, Johnston L, MacLennan G, Morris R. Five-year results of a randomised controlled trial comparing mobile and fixed bearings in total knee replacement. Bone Joint J 2013; 95(4): 486–92.
  • Browne J P, Bastaki H, Dawson J. What is the optimal time point to assess patient-reported recovery after hip and knee replacement? A systematic review and analysis of routinely reported outcome data from the English patient-reported outcome measures programme. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2013; 11(1): 128.
  • Cleveland W S. Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J Am Stat Assoc 1979; 74(368): 829–36.
  • Coretti S, Ruggeri M, McNamee P. The minimum clinically important difference for EQ-5D index: a critical review. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2014; 14(2): 221–33.
  • Dawson J, Beard D J, McKibbin H, Harris K, Jenkinson C, Price A. Development of a patient-reported outcome measure of activity and participation (the OKS-APQ) to supplement the Oxford knee score. Bone Joint J 2014; 96(3): 332–8.
  • Devlin N J, Parkin D, Browne J. Patient–reported outcome measures in the NHS: new methods for analysing and reporting EQ–5D data. Health Econ 2010; 19(8): 886–905.
  • Goodfellow J, O’Connor J, Murray D. A critique of revision rate as an outcome measure: re-interpretation of knee joint registry data. Bone Joint J 2010; 92(12): 1628–31.
  • Goodman S M, Mehta B, Mirza S Z, Figgie M P, Alexiades M, Rodriguez J, Sculco P, Parks M, Singh J A. Patients’ perspectives of outcomes after total knee and total hip arthroplasty: a nominal group study. BMC Rheumatol 2020; 4(1): 3.
  • Group T E. EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990; 16(3): 199–208.
  • Kalairajah Y, Azurza K, Hulme C, Molloy S, Drabu K J. Health outcome measures in the evaluation of total hip arthroplasties: a comparison between the Harris hip score and the Oxford hip score. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20(8): 1037–41.
  • Kennedy J A, Palan J, Mellon S J, Esler C, Dodd C A, Pandit H G, Murray D W. Most unicompartmental knee replacement revisions could be avoided: a radiographic evaluation of revised Oxford knees in the National Joint Registry. Knee Surg, Sports Traumatol, Arthroscopy 2020a: 1–9.
  • Kennedy J A, Mellon S J, Lombardi A V, Berend K R, Hamilton T W, Murray D W. Candidacy for medial unicompartmental knee replacement declines with age. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2020b; 106(3): 443.
  • Kiran A, Hunter D J, Judge A, Field R E, Javaid M K, Cooper C, Arden N K, Committee ONMEUW. A novel methodological approach for measuring symptomatic change following total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29(11): 2140–5.
  • Liddle A D, Judge A, Pandit H, Murray D W. Adverse outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee replacement in 101 330 matched patients: a study of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Lancet 2014; 384(9952): 1437–45.
  • Liddle A, Pandit H, Judge A, Murray D. Patient-reported outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a study of 14 076 matched patients from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Bone Joint J 2015; 97(6): 793–801.
  • Liddle A D, Pandit H, Judge A, Murray D W. Effect of surgical caseload on revision rate following total and unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Surg Am 2016; 98(1): 1–8.
  • Matharu G S, Judge A, Murray D W, Pandit H G. Trabecular metal acetabular components reduce the risk of revision following primary total hip arthroplasty: a propensity score matched study from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. J Arthroplasty 2017; 33(2): 447.
  • Matharu G S, Judge A, Murray D W, Pandit H G. Outcomes after metal-on-metal hip revision surgery depend on the reason for failure: a propensity score-matched study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2018; 476(2): 245–58.
  • Mohammad H R, Matharu G S, Judge A, Murray D W. Comparison of the 10-year outcomes of cemented and cementless unicompartmental knee replacements: data from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man. Acta Orthop 2020a; 91(1): 76–81.
  • Mohammad H R, Matharu G S, Judge A, Murray D W. The effect of surgeon caseload on the relative revision rate of cemented and cementless unicompartmental knee replacements: an analysis from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2020b; 102(8): 644.
  • Murray D, Fitzpatrick R, Rogers K, Pandit H, Beard D, Carr A, Dawson J. The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. Bone Joint J 2007; 89(8): 1010–4.
  • National Joint Registry. National Joint Registry 15th Annual Report. National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Isle of Man; 2018.
  • New Zealand Joint Registry. Twenty Year Report January 1999 to December 2018. New Zealand Joint Registry; 2019.
  • NHS Digital. Hospital Admitted Patient Care Activity 2019-20. Accessed 4/10/2020; 2020a. Available from: https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/hospital-admitted-patient-care-activity/2019-20.
  • NHS Digital. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). Accessed 4/10/2020; 2020b. Available from: https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/data-tools-and-services/data-services/patient-reported-outcome-measures-proms.
  • Pandit H, Jenkins C, Gill H, Barker K, Dodd C, Murray D. Minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement: results of 1000 cases. Bone Joint J 2011; 93(2): 198–204.
  • Price A J, Alvand A, Troelsen A, Katz J N, Hooper G, Gray A, Carr A, Beard D. Knee replacement. Lancet 2018; 392(10158): 1672–82.
  • Williams D, Blakey C, Hadfield S, Murray D, Price A, Field R. Long-term trends in the Oxford knee score following total knee replacement. Bone Joint J 2013; 95(1): 45–51.
  • Willis-Owen C A, Brust K, Alsop H, Miraldo M, Cobb J. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty in the UK National Health Service: an analysis of candidacy, outcome and cost efficacy. Knee 2009; 16(6): 473–8.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.