Advanced search
Publication Cover
Acta Orthopaedica Volume 92, 2021 - Issue 6
Journal homepage
2,289
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Measurement properties of UCLA Activity Scale for hip and knee arthroplasty patients and translation and cultural adaptation into Danish

Anne Mørup-Petersena Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Copenhagen, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen; Correspondence[email protected]
,
Søren T Skoub Research Unit for Musculoskeletal Function and Physiotherapy, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense; Research unit PROgrez, Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Naestved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospitals, Region Zealand;
,
Christina E Holmc Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet;
,
Paetur M Holmb Research Unit for Musculoskeletal Function and Physiotherapy, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense; Research unit PROgrez, Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Naestved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospitals, Region Zealand;
,
Claus Varnumd Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lillebaelt Hospital—Vejle, University Hospital of SouthernDenmark; Department of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Science, University of SouthernDenmark;
,
Michael R Krogsgaarde Section for Sports Traumatology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, University of Copenhagen;
,
Mogens Laursenf Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg & Farsø;;
&
Anders Odgaarda Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Copenhagen, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen; ;g Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
 show all
Pages 681-688 | Published online: 17 Sep 2021

  • Amstutz H C, Thomas B J, Jinnah R, Kim W, Grogan T, Yale C. Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip: a comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984; 66(2): 228–41.
  • Angst F. The new COSMIN guidelines confront traditional concepts of responsiveness. BMC Med Res Methodol 2011; 11: 152; author reply 152.
  • Beard D J, Harris K, Dawson J, Doll H, Murray D W, Carr A J, Price A J. Meaningful changes for the Oxford hip and knee scores after joint replacement surgery. J Clin Epidemiol 2015; 68(1): 73–9.
  • Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, Murray D. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Jt Surg - Ser B 1996; 78(2): 185–90.
  • Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Jt Surg Br 1998; 80(1): 63–9.
  • de Vet H C W, Terwee C B, Mokkink L B, Knol D L. Measurement in medicine: a practical guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
  • Epstein J, Santo R M, Guillemin F. A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus. J Clin Epidemiol 2015; 68(4): 435–41.
  • Ghomrawi H M K, Lee Y, Herrero C, Joseph A, Padgett D, Westrich G, Parks M, Lyman S. A crosswalk between UCLA and lower extremity activity scales. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017; 475(2): 542–8.
  • Gudbergsen H, Bartels E M, Krusager P, Waehrens E E, Christensen R, Danneskiold-Samsoe B, Bliddal H. Test–retest of computerized health status questionnaires frequently used in the monitoring of knee osteoarthritis: a randomized crossover trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011; 12: 190.
  • Hossain F S, Konan S, Patel S, Rodriguez-Merchan E C, Haddad F S. The assessment of outcome after total knee arthroplasty: are we there yet? Bone Joint J 2015; 97-b(1): 3–9.
  • Ingelsrud L H, Roos E M, Terluin B, Gromov K, Husted H, Troelsen A. Minimal important change values for the Oxford Knee Score and the Forgotten Joint Score at 1 year after total knee replacement. Acta Orthop 2018; 89(5): 541–7.
  • Jin X, Al Sayah F, Ohinmaa A, Marshall D A, Smith C, Johnson J A. The EQ-5D-5L is superior to the -3L version in measuring health-related quality of life in patients awaiting THA or TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2019; 477(7): 1632–44.
  • Kottner J, Audige L, Brorson S, Donner A, Gajewski B J, Hrobjartsson A, Roberts C, Shoukri M, Streiner D L. Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64(1): 96–106.
  • Landis J R, Koch G G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33(1): 159–74.
  • Mainland B J, Amodeo S, Shulman K I. Multiple clock drawing scoring systems: simpler is better. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2014; 29(2): 127–36.
  • McKenna S P, Doward L C. The translation and cultural adaptation of patient-reported outcome measures. Value Heal 2005; 8(2): 89–91.
  • Mokkink L B, Prinsen C A C, Patrick D, Alonso J, Bouter L, de Vet H C W, Terwee C B. COSMIN methodology for systematic reviews of patient–reported outcome measures (PROMs). User manual, version 1.0; 2018.
  • Murray D W, Fitzpatrick R, Rogers K, Pandit H, Beard D J, Carr A J, Dawson J. The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89(8): 1010–4.
  • Naal F D, Impellizzeri F M, Leunig M. Which is the best activity rating scale for patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467(4): 958–65.
  • Price A J, Alvand A, Troelsen A, Katz J N, Hooper G, Gray A, Carr A, Beard D. Knee replacement. Lancet 2018; 392(10158): 1672–82.
  • RCoreTeam. RStudio version 1.1.463. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/.
  • Rolfson O, Bohm E, Franklin P, Lyman S, Denissen G, Dawson J, Dunn J, Eresian Chenok K, Dunbar M, Overgaard S, Garellick G, Lubbeke A, Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Working Group of the International Society of Arthroplasty R. Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries. Report of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Working Group of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries Part II. Recommendations for selection, administration, and analysis. Acta Orthop 2016; 87(Suppl. 1): 9–23.
  • Scott C E H, Turnbull G S, MacDonald D, Breusch S J. Activity levels and return to work following total knee arthroplasty in patients under 65 years of age. Bone Joint J 2017; 99-b(8): 1037–46.
  • Shephard R J. Limits to the measurement of habitual physical activity by questionnaires. Br J Sport Med 2003; 37(3): 197–206; discussion 206.
  • Skou S T, Roos E. GLA:D (Good Life with osteoArthritis in Denmark) - Annual Report 2014; 28.
  • SooHoo N F, Li Z, Chenok K E, Bozic K J. Responsiveness of patient reported outcome measures in total joint arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplast 2015; 30(2): 176–91.
  • Swaine-Verdier A, Doward L C, Hagell P, Thorsen H, McKenna S P. Adapting quality of life instruments. Value Heal 2004; 7(Suppl. 1): S27–S30.
  • Terwee C B, Bot S D, de Boer M R, van der Windt D A, Knol D L, Dekker J, Bouter L M, de Vet H C. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007; 60(1): 34–42.
  • Terwee C B, Bouwmeester W, van Elsland S L, de Vet H C, Dekker J. Instruments to assess physical activity in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a systematic review of measurement properties. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011; 19(6): 620–33.
  • Zahiri C A, Schmalzried T P, Szuszczewicz E S, Amstutz H C. Assessing activity in joint replacement patients. J Arthroplast 1998; 13(8): 890–5.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.