Preference votes without preference? Institutional effects on preference voting: an experiment

References

• Andeweg, R. B. 2005. “The Netherlands: The Sanctity of Proportionality.” In The Politics of Electoral Systems, edited by M. Gallagher and P. Mitchell, 491–510. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• André, Audrey, Sam Depauw, Matthew Søberg Shugart, and Roman Chytilek. 2015. “Party Nomination Strategies in Flexible-List Systems: Do Preference Votes Matter?” Party Politics, Published online before print, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354068815610974.
   Google Scholar
• André, Audrey, Bram Wauters, and Jean-Benoit Pilet. 2012. “It’s Not Only About Lists: Explaining Preference Voting in Belgium.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 22 (3): 293–313. doi: 10.1080/17457289.2012.692374
   Google Scholar
• Blais, André. 2010. “Making Electoral Democracy Work.” Electoral Studies 29 (1): 169–170. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2009.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, André, and R. K. Carty. 1991. “The Psychological Impact of Electoral Laws: Measuring Duverger’s Elusive Factor.” British Journal of Political Science 21 (01): 79–93. doi: 10.1017/S0007123400006037
   Google Scholar
• Blais, André, Maxime Héroux-Legault, Laura Stephenson, William Cross, and Elisabeth Gidengil. 2012. “Assessing the Psychological and Mechanical Impact of Electoral Rules: A Quasi-Experiment.” Electoral Studies 31 (4): 829–837. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2012.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumenau, Jack, Andrew Eggers, Dominik Hangartner, and Simon Hix. 2014. “Open/Closed List and Party Choice: Experimental Evidence from the UK.” Working Paper, London School of Economics, London. Accessed 11 November 2015. http://personal.lse.ac.uk/hix/Working_Papers/open_closed_list_experiment_v11.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Brockington, David. 2003. “A Low Information Theory of Ballot Position Effect.” Political Behavior 25 (1): 1–27. doi: 10.1023/A:1022946710610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, John M., and Matthew Søberg Shugart. 1995. “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas.” Electoral Studies 14 (4): 417–439. doi: 10.1016/0261-3794(94)00035-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, William Roberts, and Matt Golder. 2006. “Rehabilitating Duverger’s Theory: Testing the Mechanical and Strategic Modifying Effects of Electoral Laws.” Comparative Political Studies 39 (6): 679–708. doi: 10.1177/0010414005278420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Winter, Lieven. 2005. “Belgium: Empowering Voters or Party Elites?” In The Politics of Electoral Systems, edited by M. Gallagher and P. Mitchell, 417–432. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duverger, Maurice. 1951. Les Partis Politiques. Paris: Armand Colin.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, Michael. 1988. “Conclusion.” In Candidate Selection in Comparative Perspective, edited by Michael Gallagher and Michael Marsh, 236–283. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Karvonen, Lauri. 2010. The Personalisation of Politics: A Study of Parliamentary Democracies. Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karvonen, Lauri. 2011. “Preferential Vote in Party List.” In Personal Representation. The Neglected Dimension of Electoral Systems, edited by Josep Colomer, 119–134. Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, R. S. 2003. “Intraparty Preference Voting.” In Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences, edited by B. Grofman and A. Lijphart, 85–103. New York: Agathon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laslier, Jean-François, André Blais, Damien Bol, Sona N. Golder, Philipp Harfst, Laura B. Stephenson, and Karine Van der Straeten. 2015. “The EuroVotePlus Experiment.” European Union Politics 16 (4): 601–615. doi: 10.1177/1465116515580180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddens, Bart, Karolien Weekers, Stefaan Fiers, and Ine Vanlangenakker. 2007. “Op Zoek Naar Een Verklaring Voor de Persoonlijke Score van de Kandidaten Bij Lokale Verkiezingen.” Res Publica 49 (1): 132–149.
   Google Scholar
• Marcinkiewicz, Kamil. 2014. “Electoral Contexts That Assist Voter Coordination: Ballot Position Effects in Poland.” Electoral Studies 33: 322–334. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2013.07.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, Michael. 1985. “The Voters Decide? Preferential Voting in European List Systems.” European Journal of Political Research 13 (4): 365–378. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.1985.tb00132.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister, Ian. 2007. “The Personalization of Politics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, edited by Russell J. Dalton and Hans-Dieter Klingemann, 571–588. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Joanne M., and Jon A. Krosnick. 1998. “The Impact of Candidate Name Order on Election Outcomes.” Public Opinion Quarterly 62 (3): 291–330. doi: 10.1086/297848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Put, Gert-Jan, and Bart Maddens. 2013. “The Selection of Candidates for Eligible Positions on PR Lists: The Belgian/Flemish Federal Elections 1999–2010.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 23 (1): 49–65. doi: 10.1080/17457289.2012.743465
   Google Scholar
• Rahat, Gideon, and Tamir Sheafer. 2007. “The Personalization(s) of Politics: Israel, 1949–2003.” Political Communication 24 (1): 65–80. doi: 10.1080/10584600601128739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, Stig Hebbelstrup Rye. 2015. “Education or Personality Traits and Intelligence as Determinants of Political Knowledge?” Political Studies, Published online before print, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renwick, A., and Jean-Benoit Pilet. 2016. Faces of the Ballot. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shugart, Matthew Søberg. 2005. “Comparative Electoral Systems Research: The Maturation of a Field and New Challenges Ahead.” In The Politics of Electoral Systems, edited by Michael Gallagher and Paul Mitchell, 25–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, Matthew M., and Laura B. Stephenson. 2009. “The Political Context and Duverger’s Theory: Evidence at the District Level.” Electoral Studies 28 (3): 480–491. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2009.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Straeten, Karine, Jean-François Laslier, and André Blais. 2013. “Vote Au Pluriel: How People Vote When Offered to Vote Under Different Rules.” PS: Political Science and Politics 46 (2): 324–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Holsteyn, J. J. M., and R. B. Andeweg. 2010. “Demoted Leaders and Exiled Candidates: Disentangling Party and Person in the Voter’s Mind.” Electoral Studies 29 (4): 628–635. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2010.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Holsteyn, J. J. M., and R. B. Andeweg. 2012. “Tweede Orde Personalisering: Voorkeurstemmen in Nederland.” Res Publica 54 (2): 163–191.
   Google Scholar
• Wauters, Bram, Dries Verlet, and Johan Ackaert. 2012. “Giving More Weight to Preferential Votes: Welcome or Superfluous Reform? The Case of the Local Elections in Flanders (Belgium).” Local Government Studies 38 (1): 91–111. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2011.629193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wauters, Bram, and Karolien Weekers. 2008. “Het gebruik van de voorkeurstem bij de federale parlementsverkiezingen van 10 juni 2007.” Res Publica 50 (2): 49–88.
   Google Scholar
• Wauters, Bram, Karolien Weekers, and Jean-Benoit Pilet. 2004. “Het Gebruik van de Voorkeurstem Bij de Regionale En Europese Parlementsverkiezingen van 13 Juni 2004.” Res Publica 46 (2–3): 377–411.
   Google Scholar