On the nature of voters’ coalition preferences

References

• Alesina, A., and H. Rosenthal. 1995. Partisan Politics, Divided Government, and the Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez, R. M., and M. M. Schousen. 1993. “Policy Moderation or Conflicting Expectations? Testing the Intentional Models of Split-ticket Voting.” American Politics Quarterly 21 (4): 410–438. doi: 10.1177/1532673X9302100402
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, D. A., and R. M. Duch. 2010. “Why Can Voters Anticipate Post-election Coalition Formation Likelihoods?” Electoral Studies 29 (3): 308–315. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2010.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banaszak, L. A., and P. Doerschler. 2012. “Coalition Type and Voter Support for Parties: Grand Coalitions in German Elections.” Electoral Studies 31 (1): 46–59. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2011.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargsted, M. A., and O. Kedar. 2009. “Coalition-targeted Duvergerian Voting: How Expectations Affect Voter Choice Under Proportional Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 53 (2): 307–323. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00372.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, L. M. 2002. “The Impact of Candidate Traits in American Presidential Elections.” In Leaders’ Personalities and the Outcomes of Democratic Elections, edited by Anthony King, 44–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blais, A., J. H. Aldrich, I. H. Indridason, and R. Levine. 2006. “Do Voters Vote for Government Coalitions? Testing Downs’ Pessimistic Conclusion.” Party Politics 12 (6): 691–705. doi: 10.1177/1354068806068594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, A., R. Nadeau, E. Gidengil, and N. Nevitte. 2001. “The Formation of Party Preferences: Testing the Proximity and Directional Models.” European Journal of Political Research 40 (1): 81–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowler, S., T. Gschwend, and I. H. Indridason. 2014. “Coalition Policy Perceptions.” Presented at the 73rd Annual MPSA Conference, Chicago, IL, April 16–19.
   Google Scholar
• Bowler, S., J. A. Karp, and T. Donovan. 2010. “Strategic Coalition Voting: Evidence from New Zealand.” Electoral Studies 29 (3): 350–357. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2010.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burden, B. C., and D. C. Kimball. 2004. Why Americans Split Their Tickets: Campaigns, Competition, and Divided Government. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., W. L. Gardner, and G. G. Berntson. 1997. “Beyond Bipolar Conceptualizations and Measures: The Case of Attitudes and Evaluative Space.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 1 (1): 3–25. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0101_2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Campbell, A., and W. E. Miller. 1957. “The Motivational Basis of Straight and Split Ticket Voting.” American Political Science Review 51 (2): 293–312. doi: 10.2307/1952193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caprara, G. V., and P. G. Zimbardo. 2004. “Personalizing Politics: A Congruency Model of Political Preference.” American Psychologist 59 (7): 581–594. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.59.7.581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, J. M., R. G. Niemi, and L. Powell. 2000. “Incumbency and the Probability of Reelection in State Legislative Elections.” The Journal of Politics 62 (3): 671–700. doi: 10.1111/0022-3816.00029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, M. 2009. “Valence and Electoral Outcomes in Western Europe, 1976–1998.” Electoral Studies 28 (1): 111–122. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2008.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debus, M., and J. Müller. 2014. “Expected Utility or Learned Familiarity? The Formation of Voters’ Coalition Preferences.” Electoral Studies 34: 54–67. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2013.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Eijk, C., and M. N. Franklin. 1996. Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of the Union. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Duch, R. M., J. May, and D. A. Armstrong. 2010. “Coalition-directed Voting in Multiparty Democracies.” American Political Science Review 104 (4): 698–719. doi: 10.1017/S0003055410000420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falcó-Gimeno, A. 2012. “Preferences for Political Coalitions in Spain.” South European Society and Politics 17 (3): 487–502. doi: 10.1080/13608746.2012.701900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorina, M. P. 1996. Divided Government. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Fortunato, D., and R. T. Stevenson. 2013. “Perceptions of Partisan Ideologies: The Effect of Coalition Participation.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (2): 459–477. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00623.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. 1961. “A Theory of Coalition Formation.” American Sociological Review 26 (3): 373–382. doi: 10.2307/2090664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasgow, G., M. Golder, and S. N. Golder. 2012. “New Empirical Strategies for the Study of Parliamentary Government Formation.” Political Analysis 20 (2): 248–270. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpr058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golder, S. N. 2006. “Pre-electoral Coalition Formation in Parliamentary Democracies.” British Journal of Political Science 36 (2): 193–212. doi: 10.1017/S0007123406000123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J., and S. Hobolt. 2008. “Owning the Issue Agenda: Party Strategies and Vote Choices in British Elections.” Electoral Studies 27 (3): 460–476. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2008.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gschwend, T. 2007. “Ticket Splitting and Strategic Voting Under Mixed Electoral Rules: Evidence from Germany.” European Journal of Political Research 46 (1): 1–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00641.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gschwend, T., and M. Hooghe. 2008. “Should I Stay or Should I Go? An Experimental Study on Voter Responses to Pre-electoral Coalitions.” European Journal of Political Research 47 (5): 556–577. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2008.00787.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinich, M. J., and M. C. Munger. 1994. Ideology and the Theory of Political Choice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hobolt, S. B., and J. A. Karp. 2010. “Voters and Coalition Governments.” Electoral Studies 29 (3): 299–307. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2010.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook, Allyson L., J. A. Krosnick, P. S. Visser, W. L. Gardner, and J. T. Cacioppo. 2001. “Attitudes Toward Presidential Candidates and Political Parties: Initial Optimism, Inertial First Impressions, and a Focus on Flaws.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (4): 930–950. doi: 10.2307/2669333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, S. 2014. “Coalitions and Voting Behavior in a Differentiating Multiparty System.” In Voters on the Move or on the Run?, edited by B. Wessels, H. Rattinger, S. Rossteutscher, and R. Schmitt-Beck, 65–87. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Indridason, I. H. 2011. “Proportional Representation, Majoritarian Legislatures, and Coalitional Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (4): 955–971. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00530.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kedar, O. 2005. “When Moderate Voters Prefer Extreme Parties: Policy Balancing in Parliamentary Elections.” American Political Science Review 99 (2): 185–199. doi: 10.1017/S0003055405051592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kedar, O. 2009. Voting for Policy, Not Parties: How Voters Compensate for Power Sharing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kritzinger, S., E. Zeglovits, J. Aichholzer, C. Glantschnigg, K. Glinitzer, D. Johann, K. Thomas, and M. Wagner. 2014a. “AUTNES Pre- and Post-panel Study 2013.” GESIS Data Archive, Cologne: ZA5859 Data file Version 1.0.0.
   Google Scholar
• Kritzinger, S., E. Zeglovits, J. Aichholzer, C. Glantschnigg, K. Glinitzer, D. Johann, K. Thomas, and M. Wagner. 2014b. AUTNES Pre- and Post- Election Survey 2013 – Documentation. Vienna: University of Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Lau, R. R. 1982. “Negativity in Political Perception.” Political Behavior 4 (4): 353–377. doi: 10.1007/BF00986969
   Google Scholar
• Lau, R. R., and D. P. Redlawsk. 2001. “Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision Making.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (4): 951–971. doi: 10.2307/2669334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver, M., and K. A. Shepsle. 1990. “Coalitions and Cabinet Government.” The American Political Science Review 84 (3): 873–890. doi: 10.2307/1962770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver, M., and K. A. Shepsle. 1996. Making and Breaking Governments: Cabinets and Legislatures in Parliamentary Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lavine, H. G., C. D. Johnston, and M. R. Steenbergen. 2012. The Ambivalent Partisan: How Critical Loyalty Promotes Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, L. W., and R. T. Stevenson. 2001. “Government Formation in Parliamentary Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (1): 33–50. doi: 10.2307/2669358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, L. W., and G. Vanberg. 2014. “Parties and Policymaking in Multiparty Governments: The Legislative Median, Ministerial Autonomy, and the Coalition Compromise.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (4): 979–996. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meffert, M. F., and T. Gschwend. 2010. “Strategic Coalition Voting: Evidence from Austria.” Electoral Studies 29 (3): 339–349. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2010.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meffert, M. F., and T. Gschwend. 2012. “Coalition Preferences in Multiparty Systems.” Paper prepared for the 65th Annual Conference of the World Association for Public Opinion Research, Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Meffert, M. F., S. Huber, T. Gschwend, and F. U. Pappi. 2011. “More than Wishful Thinking: Causes and Consequences of Voters’ Electoral Expectations About Parties and Coalitions.” Electoral Studies 30 (4): 804–815. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2011.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, T. M., and D. Strobl. 2016. “Voter Perceptions of Coalition Policy Positions in Multiparty Systems.” Electoral Studies 41: 80–91. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2015.11.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, W. C. 2005. “Austria: a Complex Electoral System with Subtle Effects.” In The Politics of Electoral Systems, edited by M. Gallagher and P. Mitchell, 397–416. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pappi, F. U., and P. W. Thurner. 2002. “Electoral Behaviour in a Two-vote System: Incentives for Ticket Splitting in German Bundestag Elections.” European Journal of Political Research 41 (2): 207–232. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.00010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardos-Prado, S., and E. Dinas. 2010. “Systemic Polarisation and Spatial Voting.” European Journal of Political Research 49 (6): 759–786. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01918.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plescia, C. 2016. “The Effect of Pre-Electoral Party Coordination on Vote Choice: Evidence from the Italian Regional Elections.” Political Studies doi:10.1177/0032321715607512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soroka, S. N. 2014. Negativity in Democratic Politics: Causes and Consequences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taber, C. S., and M. Lodge. 2006. “Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 755–769. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, G. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Eijk, C., W. van der Brug, M. Kroh, and M. Franklin. 2006. “Rethinking the Dependent Variable in Voting Behavior: On the Measurement and Analysis of Electoral Utilities.” Electoral Studies 25 (3): 424–447. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2005.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, M., and T. M. Meyer. 2015. “Negative Issue Ownership.” West European Politics 38 (4): 797–816. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2015.1039380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westholm, A. 1997. “Distance Versus Direction: The Illusory Defeat of the Proximity Theory of Electoral Choice.” American Political Science Review 91 (4): 865–883. doi: 10.2307/2952170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaller, J. R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar