1,221
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The effect of political sophistication and party identification on voter–party congruence. A comparative analysis of 30 countries

, &

References

  • Achen, C. H. 2002. “Parental Socialization and Rational Party Identification.” Political Behavior 24 (2): 151–170. doi: 10.1023/A:1021278208671
  • Blais, A., and K. Aarts. 2006. “Electoral Systems and Turnout.” Acta Politica 41 (2): 180–196. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500148
  • Blais, A., and M. Bodet. 2006. “Does Proportional Representation Foster Closer Congruence Between Citizens and Policy Makers?” Comparative Political Studies 39 (10): 1243–1262. doi: 10.1177/0010414005284374
  • Brambor, T., W. R. Clark, and M. Golder. 2006. "Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses." Political analysis 14 (1): 63–82. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpi014
  • van der Brug, W. 2010. “Structural and Ideological Voting in Age Cohorts.” West European Politics 33 (3): 586–607. doi: 10.1080/01402381003654593
  • Campbell, A., P. E. Converse, W. E. Miller, and D. E. Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Carmines, E. G., and J. A. Stimson. 1980. “The Two Faces of Issue Voting.” American Political Science Review 74 (1): 78–91. doi: 10.2307/1955648
  • Carsey, T. M., and G. C. Layman. 2006. “Changing Sides or Changing Minds? Party Identification and Policy Preferences in the American Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (2): 464–477. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00196.x
  • Dalton, R. J. 1984. “Cognitive Mobilization and Partisan Dealignment in Advanced Industrial Democracies.” The Journal of Politics 46 (1): 264–284. doi: 10.2307/2130444
  • Dalton, R. J. 1985. “Political Parties and Political Representation: Party Supporters and Party Elites in Nine Nations.” Comparative Political Studies 18 (3): 267–299. doi: 10.1177/0010414085018003001
  • Dalton, R. J. 1996. “Political Cleavages, Issues, and Electoral Change.” In Comparing Democracies 2. Elections and Voting in Global Perspective, edited by L. LeDuc, R. G. Niemi, and P. Norris, 189–209. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Dalton, R. J. 2000. “The Decline of Party Identifications.” In Parties Without Partisans. Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies, edited by R. J. Dalton and M. P. Wattenberg, 19–38. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Dalton, R. J. 2008. "Citizenship Norms and the Expansion of Political Participation." Political Studies 56 (1): 76–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00718.x
  • Dalton, R. J. 2014. “Interpreting Partisan Dealignment in Germany.” German Politics 23 (1–2): 134–144. doi: 10.1080/09644008.2013.853040
  • Dalton, R. J., D. M. Farrell, and I. McAllister. 2011. Political Parties and Democratic Linkage. How Parties Organize Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Dalton, R. J., and M. P. Wattenberg, eds. 2000. Parties Without Partisans. Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Dassonneville, R. 2012. “Electoral Volatility, Political Sophistication, Trust and Efficacy: A Study on Changes in Voter Preferences during the Belgian Regional Elections of 2009.” Acta Politica 47 (1): 18–41. doi: 10.1057/ap.2011.19
  • Delli Carpini, M. X., and S. Keeter. 1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Downs, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Fiorina, M. P. 2002. “Parties and Partisanship: A Forty Year Retrospective.” Political Behavior 24 (2): 93–115. doi: 10.1023/A:1021274107763
  • Fraile, M. 2010. “Widening or Reducing the Knowledge Gap? Testing the Media Effects on Political Knowledge in Spain (2004–2006).” The International Journal of Press/Politics 16 (2): 163–184. doi: 10.1177/1940161210388413
  • Franklin, C. H. 1984. “Issue Preferences, Socialization, and the Evolution of Party Identification.” American Journal of Political Science 28 (3): 459–478. doi: 10.2307/2110900
  • Franklin, M. N. 1992. “The Decline of Cleavage Politics.” In Electoral Change: Responses to Evolving Social and Attitudinal Structures in Western Countries, edited by M. N. Franklin, T. Mackie, and H. Valen, 383–431. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Galston, W. A. 2001. “Political Knowledge, Political Engagement, and Civic Education.” Annual Review of Political Science 4: 217–234. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.217
  • Gibson, S., and L. Hamilton. 2013. “Knowledge, Autonomy and Maturity: Developmental and Educational Concerns as Rhetorical Resources in Adolescents’ Discussions Regarding the Age of Electoral Majority in England.” Journal of Youth Studies 16 (1): 34–53. doi: 10.1080/13676261.2012.693589
  • Giger, N., and Z. Lefkofridi. 2014. “Salience-Based Congruence Between Parties & their Voters: The Swiss Case.” Swiss Political Science Review 20 (2): 287–304. doi: 10.1111/spsr.12069
  • Golder, M., and J. Stramski. 2010. “Ideological Congruence and Electoral Institutions.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (1): 90–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00420.x
  • Grönlund, K., and H. Milner. 2006. “The Determinants of Political Knowledge in Comparative Perspective.” Scandinavian Political Studies 29 (4): 386–406. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9477.2006.00157.x
  • Holmberg, S. 1999. “Collective Policy Congruence Compared.” In Policy Representation in Western Democracies, edited by P. Esaiasson, R. Herrera, S. Holmberg, R. Pierce, J. Thomassen, and B. Wessels, 87–109. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Hooghe, M., and A. Kern. 2015. “Party Membership and Closeness and the Development of Trust in Political Institutions: An Analysis of the European Social Survey, 2002–2010.” Party Politics 21 (6): 944–956. doi: 10.1177/1354068813509519
  • Howe, P. 2010. Citizens Adrift. The Democratic Disengagement of Young Canadians. Vancouver: UBC Press.
  • Johnston, R. 2006. “Party Identification: Unmoved Mover or Sum of Preferences?” Annual Review of Political Science 9: 329–351. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.062404.170523
  • Klingemann, H.-D., and B. Wessels. 2009. “How Voters Cope with the Complexity of Their Political Environment.” In The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, edited by H.-D. Klingemann, 237–268. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Laakso, M., and R. Taagepera. 1979. “‘Effective’ Number of Parties. A Measure with Application to West Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 12 (1): 3–27.
  • Lachat, R. 2007. A Heterogeneous Electorate. Political Sophistication, Predisposition Strength, and the Voting Decision Process. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag.
  • Lachat, R. 2009. Is Left-Right from Circleland? The Issue Basis of CitizensIdeological Self-Placement. Zürich: Center for Comparative and International Studies.
  • Lau, R. R., D. J. Andersen, and D. P. Redlawsk. 2008. “An Exploration of Correct Voting in Recent U.S. Presidential Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (2): 395–411. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00319.x
  • Lau, R. R., P. Patel, D. F. Fahmy, and R. R. Kaufman. 2013. “Correct Voting across Thirty-Three Democracies: A Preliminary Analysis.” British Journal of Political Science 44 (2): 239–259. doi: 10.1017/S0007123412000610
  • Lau, R. R., and D. P. Redlawsk. 1997. “Voting Correctly.” American Political Science Review 91 (3): 585–598. doi: 10.2307/2952076
  • Lau, R. R., and D. P. Redlawsk. 2001. “Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision Making.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (4): 951–971. doi: 10.2307/2669334
  • Lefkofridi, Z., N. Giger, and A. Gallego. 2014. “Electoral Participation in Pursuit of Policy Representation: Ideological Congruence and Voter Turnout.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 24 (3): 291–311. doi: 10.1080/17457289.2013.846347
  • McAllister, I. 2007. “The Personalization of Politics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, edited by R. J. Dalton and H.-D. Klingemann, 571–588. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Merrill, S., B. Grofman, and J. Adams. 2001. “Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Voter Projections of Party Locations: Evidence from Norway, France, and the USA.” European Journal of Political Research 40 (2): 199–221. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.00594
  • Miller, W. E., and D. E. Stokes. 1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” American Political Science Review 57 (1): 45–56. doi: 10.2307/1952717
  • Pierce, P. A. 1993. “Political Sophistication and the Use of Candidate Traits in Candidate Evaluation.” Political Psychology 14 (1): 21–35. doi: 10.2307/3791391
  • Powell, G. B. 2004. “Political Representation in Comparative Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 7: 273–296. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.012003.104815
  • Powell, G. B., and G. S. Vanberg. 2000. "Election Laws, Disproportionality and Median Correspondence: Implications for Two Visions of Democracy." British Journal of Political Science 30 (3): 383–411. doi: 10.1017/S0007123400000168
  • Rosema, M., B. Denters, and K. Aarts. 2011. How Democracy Works: Political Representation and Policy Congruence in Modern Societies. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
  • Simas, E. N. 2013. “Proximity Voting in the 2010 U.S. House Elections.” Electoral Studies 32 (4): 708–717. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2013.02.005
  • Singh, S. P. 2010. “Contextual Influences on the Decision Calculus: A Cross-National Examination of Proximity Voting.” Electoral Studies 29 (3): 425–434. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2010.03.014
  • Van Spanje, J., and W. Van Der Brug. 2007. "The Party as Pariah: The Exclusion of Anti-Immigration Parties and its Effect on their Ideological Positions." West European Politics 30 (5): 1022–1040. doi: 10.1080/01402380701617431
  • Wessels, B. 1999. “System Characteristics Matter: Empirical Evidence from Ten Representation Studies.” In Policy Representation in Western Democracies, edited by P. Esaiasson, R. Herrera, S. Holmberg, R. Pierce, J. Thomassen, and B. Wessels, 137–161. New York: Oxford University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.