The costs of electoral fraud: establishing the link between electoral integrity, winning an election, and satisfaction with democracy

References

• Aarts, Kees, and Jacques Thomassen. 2008. “Satisfaction with Democracy: Do Institutions Matter?” Electoral Studies 27 (1): 5–18. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2007.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alemika, Ettanibi. 2007. Quality of Elections, Satisfaction with Democracy, and Political Trust in Africa. Afrobarometer Working Paper (84).
   Google Scholar
• Almond, Gabriel A., and Sidney Verba. 1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Christopher J., André Blais, Shaun Bowler, Todd Donovan, and Ola Listhaug. 2005. Losers’ Consent. Elections and Democratic Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Christopher J., and Christine Guillory. 1997. “Political Institutions and Satisfaction with Democracy: A Cross-National Analysis of Consensus and Majoritarian Systems.” American Political Science Review 91 (1): 66–81. doi: 10.2307/2952259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, Christopher J., and Yuliya V. Tverdova. 2001. “Winners, Losers, and Attitudes about Government in Contemporary Democracies.” International Political Science Review 22 (4): 321–338. doi: 10.1177/0192512101022004003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, Christopher J., and Yuliya V. Tverdova. 2003. “Corruption, Political Allegiances, and Attitudes Toward Government in Contemporary Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science 47 (1): 91–109. doi: 10.1111/1540-5907.00007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, Thorsten, George R. Clarke, Alberto Groff, Philip Keefer, and Patrick Walsh. 2001. “New Tools and New Tests in Comparative Political Economy. The Database of Political Institutions.” World Bank Economic Review 15 (1): 165–176. doi: 10.1093/wber/15.1.165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernauer, Julian, and Adrian Vatter. 2012. “Can’t Get No Satisfaction with the Westminster Model? Winners, Losers and the Effects of Consensual and Direct Democratic Institutions on Satisfaction with Democracy.” European Journal of Political Research 51 (4): 435–468. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.02007.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch, Sarah. 2008. “Electoral Institutions and Popular Confidence in Electoral Processes: A Cross-national Analysis.” Electoral Studies 27 (2): 305–320. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2008.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch, Sarah. 2010. “Perceptions of Electoral Fairness and Voter Turnout.” Comparative Political Studies 43 (12): 1601–1622. doi: 10.1177/0010414010374021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, André. 2000. To Vote or Not to Vote: The Merits and Limits of Rational Choice Theory. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blais, André, and Kenneth R. Carty. 1990. “Does Proportional Representation Foster Turnout.” European Journal of Political Research 18 (2): 167–181. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.1990.tb00227.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, André, and François Gélineau. 2007. “Winning, Losing and Satisfaction with Democracy.” Political Studies 55 (2): 425–441. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00659.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowler, Shaun, and Todd Donovan. 2002. “Democracy, Institutions and Attitudes about Citizen Influence on Government.” British Journal of Political Science 32 (2): 371–390. doi: 10.1017/S0007123402000157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brambor, Thomas, William Roberts Clark, and Matt Golder. 2006. “Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses.” Political Analysis 14 (1): 63–82. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpi014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratton, Michael. 1998. “Second Elections in Africa.” Journal of Democracy 9 (3): 51–66. doi: 10.1353/jod.1998.0041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratton, Michael, and Nicolas van de Walle. 1997. Democratic Experiments in Africa: Regime Transitions in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, Harold D., and Alan C. Acock. 1989. “National Elections and Political Attitudes: The Case of Political Efficacy.” British Journal of Political Science 19 (4): 551–562. doi: 10.1017/S0007123400005639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, Stefan, and Sören Holmberg. 2013. “Democracy and Bureaucracy: How Their Quality Matters for Popular Satisfaction.” West European Politics 37 (3): 515–537. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2013.830468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, Larry. 1999. Developing Democracy Toward Consolidation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Donno, Daniela, and Nasos Roussias. 2012. “Does Cheating Pay? The Effect of Electoral Misconduct on Party Systems.” Comparative Political Studies 45 (5): 575–605. doi: 10.1177/0010414011427130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elklit, Jørgen, and Andrew Reynolds. 2005. “A Framework for the Systematic Study of Election Quality.” Democratization 12 (2): 147–162. doi: 10.1080/13510340500069204
   Google Scholar
• Finkel, Steven E., Edward N. Muller, and Mitchell A. Seligson. 1987. “Economic Crisis, Incumbent Performance and Regime Support.” British Journal of Political Science 19 (3): 329–351. doi: 10.1017/S0007123400005512
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, Mark N. 2002. “The Dynamics of Electoral Participation.” In Comparing Democracies 2: New Challenges in the Study of Elections and Voting, edited by Lawrence LeDuc, Richard G. Niemi, and Pippa Norris, 216–235. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, Mark N. 2004. Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies Since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilley, Bruce. 2006. “The Determinants of State Legitimacy: Results for 72 Countries.” International Political Science Review 27 (1): 47–71. doi: 10.1177/0192512106058634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimes, Marcia. 2006. “Organizing Consent: The Role of Procedural Fairness in Political Trust and Compliance.” European Journal of Political Research 45 (2): 285–315. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00299.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, Ailsa. 2008. “Satisfaction with Democracy: The Impact of Winning and Losing in Westminster Systems.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 18 (1): 3–26. doi: 10.1080/17457280701858581
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackman, Robert W., and Ross A. Miller. 1995. “Voter Turnout in the Industrial Democracies During the 1980s.” Comparative Political Studies 27 (4): 467–492. doi: 10.1177/0010414095027004001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karp, Jeffrey A., and Susan A. Banducci. 2008. “Political Efficacy and Participation in Twenty Seven Democracies: How Electoral Systems Shape Political Behaviour.” British Journal of Political Science 38 (2): 311–334. doi: 10.1017/S0007123408000161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, Judith. 2010. Data on International Election Monitoring: Three Global Datasets on Election Quality, Election Events and International Election Observation. ICPSR31461. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [Distributor].
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, Judith. 2012. Monitoring Democracy: When International Election Observation Works and Why it Often Fails. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, Judith, and Kiril Kolev. 2010. “Election Quality and International Observation 1975–2004: Two New Datasets.” SSRN. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1694654.
   Google Scholar
• Klingemann, Hans-Dieter. 1999. “Mapping Political Support in the 1990s: A Global Analysis.” In Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government, edited by Pippa Norris, 31–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lehoucq, Fabrice. 2003. “Electoral Fraud: Causes, Types, and Consequences.” Annual Review of Political Science 6: 233–256. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linde, Jonas, and Joakim Ekman. 2003. “Satisfaction with Democracy: A Note on a Frequently Used Indicator in Comparative Politics.” European Journal of Political Research 42 (3): 391–408. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.00089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linz, Juan J., and Alfred Stepan. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Southern Europe, South America and Postcommunist Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1994. “The Social Requisites of Democracy Revisited: 1993 Presidential Address.” American Sociological Review 59 (1): 1–22. doi: 10.2307/2096130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magalhães, Pedro C. 2016. “Economic Evaluations, Procedural Fairness and Satisfaction with Democracy.” Political Research Quarterly 69 (3): 522–534. doi: 10.1177/1065912916652238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister, Ian. 1999. “The Economic Performance of Governments.” In Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance, edited by Pippa Norris, 188–203. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, James A., and Jorge I. Domínguez. 1998. “Mexicans React to Political Fraud and Corruption: An Assessment of Public Opinion and Voting Behavior.” Electoral Studies 17 (4): 483–503. doi: 10.1016/S0261-3794(98)00026-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mischler, W., and Richard Rose. 2001. “Political Support for Incomplete Democracies: Realist vs. Idealist Theories and Measures.” International Political Science Review 22 (4): 303–320. doi: 10.1177/0192512101022004002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton, Kenneth. 2006. “Political Support: Social Capital, Civil Society and Political and Economic Performance.” Political Studies 54 (4): 846–864. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.00634.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, Pippa. 1999. “Conclusions: The Growth of Critical Citizens and Its Consequences.” In Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government, edited by Pippa Norris, 257–272. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, Pippa. 2004. Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, Pippa. 2011. Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, Pippa. 2013. “Does the World Agree About Standards of Electoral Integrity? Evidence for the Diffusion of Global Norms.” Electoral Studies 32 (4): 576–588. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2013.07.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, Pippa. 2014. Why Electoral Integrity Matters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, Bo. 2009. “Creating Political Legitimacy: Electoral Democracy Versus Quality of Government.” American Behavioral Scientist 53 (3): 311–330. doi: 10.1177/0002764209338795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein, Bo, and Jan Teorell. 2008. “What Is Quality of Government? A Theory of Impartial Government Institutions.” Governance 21 (2): 165–190. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00391.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schedler, Andreas. 2002. “Elections without Democracy: The Menu of Manipulation.” Journal of Democracy 13 (2): 36–50. doi: 10.1353/jod.2002.0031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schedler, Andreas. 2006. “The Logic of Electoral Authoritarianism.” In Electoral Authoritarianism. The Dynamics of Unfree Competition, edited by Andreas Schedler, 2–34. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, Shane, Ekrem Karakoç, and André Blais. 2012. “Differentiating Winners: How Elections Affect Satisfaction With Democracy.” Electoral Studies 31 (1): 201–211. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2011.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teorell, Jan, Nicholas Charron, Stefan Dahlberg, Sören Holmberg, Bo Rothstein, Petrus Sundin, and Richard Svensson. 2012. The Quality of Government Standard Dataset, Version 21 May 2012. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (www.cses.org). 2003. “CSES Module 1 Full Release [Dataset].” Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies [producer and distributor].
   Google Scholar
• The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (www.cses.org). 2007. “CSES Module 2 Full Release [dataset].” June 27, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, Alexander F., Friedrich Schneider, and Martin Halla. 2008. “The Quality of Institutions and Satisfaction with Democracy in Western Europe – A Panel Analysis.” European Journal of Political Economy 25 (1): 30–41. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2008.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittrock, Jill. 2010. “Cross-Validating Survey Measures: The EES and CSES Datasets.” Paper prepared for presentation at the PIREDEU Final User Community Conference, Hotel Silken Berlaymont, Brussels, November 18–19.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2016. “World Development Indicators.” http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators.
   Google Scholar