Party policy diffusion in the European multilevel space: what it is, how it works, and why it matters

References

• Böhmelt, Tobias, Lawrence Ezrow, Roni Lehrer, and Hugh Ward. 2016. “Party Policy Diffusion.” American Political Science Review 110 (2): 397–410. doi: 10.1017/S0003055416000162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulmer, Simon, and Stephen Padgett. 2005. “Policy Transfer in the European Union: An Institutionalist Perspective.” British Journal of Political Science 35 (1): 103–126. doi: 10.1017/S0007123405000050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, Daniel M., Craig Volden, Adam M. Dynes, and Boris Shor. 2017. “Ideology, Learning, and Policy Diffusion: Experimental Evidence.” American Journal of Political Science 61 (1): 37–49. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramani, Daniele. 2015. The Europeanization of Politics: The Formation of a European Electorate and Party System in Historical Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, Richard, Francis Jacobs, and Michael Shackleton. 2011. The European Parliament. London: John Harper.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries, Erik, Martijn Schoonvelde, and Gijs Schumacher. 2018. “No Longer Lost in Translation. Evidence that Google Translate Works for Comparative Bag-of-Words Text Applications.” Political Analysis 26 (4): 417–430. doi: 10.1017/pan.2018.26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbin, Frank, Beth A. Simmons, and Geoffrey Garrett. 2007. “The Global Diffusion of Public Policies: Social Construction, Coercion, Competition, or Learning?” Annual Review of Sociology 33 (1): 449–472. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.33.090106.142507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolowitz, David P., and David Marsh. 2000. “Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy-Making.” Governance 13 (1): 5–24. doi: 10.1111/0952-1895.00121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, John S., and Simon Niemeyer. 2006. “Reconciling Pluralism and Consensus as Political Ideals.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 634–649. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00206.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkins, Zachary, and Beth A. Simmons. 2005. “On Waves, Clusters, and Diffusion: A Conceptual Framework.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 598 (1): 33–51. doi: 10.1177/0002716204272516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elster, Jon. 1998. “Deliberation and Constitution Making.” In Deliberative Democracy, edited by Jon Elster, 97–122. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilardi, Fabrizio. 2010. “Who Learns from What in Policy Diffusion Processes?” American Journal of Political Science 54 (3): 650–666. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00452.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilardi, Fabrizio. 2016. “Four Ways We Can Improve Policy Diffusion Research.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 16 (1): 8–21. doi: 10.1177/1532440015608761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmer, Justin, and Brandon M. Stewart. 2013. “Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts.” Political Analysis 21 (3): 267–297. doi: 10.1093/pan/mps028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grose, Christian R., Neil Malhotra, and Robert P. Van Houweling. 2015. “Explaining Explanations: How Legislators Explain Their Policy Positions and How Citizens React.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (3): 724–743. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, Peter A. 1993. “Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policy Making in Britain.” Comparative Politics 25 (3): 275–296. doi: 10.2307/422246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennl, Annika, and Simon Tobias Franzmann. 2017. “The Effects of Manifesto Politics on Programmatic Change.” In Organizing Political Parties: Representation, Participation, and Power, edited by Susan E. Scarrow, Paul D. Webb, and Thomas Poguntke, 259–284. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, Karl Magnus. 2002a. “Party Elites in Multilevel Europe: The Christian Democrats and the Single European Act.” Party Politics 8: 4. doi: 10.1177/1354068802008004004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, Karl Magnus. 2002b. “Another Road to Maastricht: The Christian Democrat Coalition and the Quest for European Union.” Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (1): 871–893. doi: 10.1111/1468-5965.00401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, Karl Magnus. 2016a. “Europarty Influence and Its Limits: The Case of the European People’s Party and the Amsterdam Treaty.” Journal of European Integration 38 (1): 79–94. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2015.1088012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, Karl Magnus. 2016b. “The Role of Europarties in EU Treaty Reform: Theory and Practice.” Acta Politica 52 (3): 286–305. doi: 10.1057/s41269-016-0024-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juhl, Sebastian. 2018. “Measurement Uncertainty in Spatial Models: A Bayesian Dynamic Measurement Model.” Political Analysis. doi:10.1017/pan.2018.35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, Daniel, Paul Slovic, and Amos Tversky. 1982. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, Wolfram. 2007. Christian Democracy and the Origins of European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, Richard S., and Peter Mair. 1993. “The Evolution of Party Organizations in Europe: The Three Faces of Party Organization.” The American Review of Politics 14: 593–617. doi: 10.15763/issn.2374-7781.1993.14.0.593-617
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, Roni. 2012. “Intra-Party Democracy and Party Responsiveness.” West European Politics 35 (6): 1295–1219. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2012.713747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehrer, Roni, Lawrence Ezrow, Hugh Ward, and Tobias Böhmelt. 2017. “Intraparty Democracy and Responsiveness to Rival Parties’ Policies.” Social Science Quarterly 98 (3): 1026–1044. doi: 10.1111/ssqu.12432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macklin, Graham. 2013. “Transnational Networking on the Far Right: The Case of Britain and Germany.” West European Politics 36 (1): 176–198. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2013.742756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggetti, Martino, and Fabrizio Gilardi. 2016. “Problems (and Solutions) in the Measurement of Policy Diffusion Mechanisms.” Journal of Public Policy 36 (1): 87–107. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X1400035X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, David, and J. C. Sharman. 2009. “Policy Diffusion and Policy Transfer.” Policy Studies 30 (3): 269–288. doi: 10.1080/01442870902863851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, Michael, and Ian Budge. 2005. Elections, Parties, Democracy: Conferering the Median Mandate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merz, Nicolas, Sven Regel, and Jirka Lewandowski. 2016. “The Manifesto Corpus: A New Resource for Research on Political Parties and Quantitative Text Analysis.” Research & Politics 3 (2): 1–8. doi: 10.1177/2053168016643346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meseguer, Covadonga. 2009. Learning, Policy Making, and Market Reforms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, David L. 1996. “Focus Groups.” Annual Review of Sociology 22: 129–152. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettitt, Robin. 2018. “The ‘How’ of Election Manifestos in the British Labour Party.” Party Politics 24 (3): 289–295. doi: 10.1177/1354068816678889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roos, Mechthild. 2019. “Intra-Party Group Unity in the European Parliament Prior to Its First Direct Elections in 1979.” Parliamentary Affairs 72 (3): 464–479. doi: 10.1093/pa/gsx053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacher, Gijs, Catherine E. de Vries, and Barbara Vis. 2013. “Why Do Parties Change Position? Party Organization and Environmental Incentives.” Journal of Politics 75 (2): 464–477. doi: 10.1017/S0022381613000145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism & Democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers.
   Google Scholar
• Senninger, Roman, and Daniel Bischof. 2018. “Working in Unison: Political Parties and Policy Issue Transfer in the Multilevel Space.” European Union Politics 19 (1): 140–162. doi: 10.1177/1465116517733819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shipan, Charles R., and Craig Volden. 2008. “The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (4): 840–857. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00346.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, Beth A., and Zachary Elkins. 2004. “The Globalization of Liberalization: Policy Diffusion in the International Political Economy.” American Political Science Review 98 (1): 171–190. doi: 10.1017/S0003055404001078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volden, Craig. 2002. “The Politics of Competitive Federalism: A Race to the Bottom in Welfare Benefits?” American Journal of Political Science 46 (2): 352–363. doi: 10.2307/3088381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weyland, Kurt. 2005. “Theories of Policy Diffusion: Lessons from Latin American Pension Reform.” World Politics 57 (2): 262–295. doi: 10.1353/wp.2005.0019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weyland, Kurt. 2009. Bounded Rationality and Policy Diffusion: Social Sector Reform in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, Jonathan, and Lea Ypi. 2016. The Meaning of Partisanship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Laron K. 2015. “It’s All Relative: Spatial Positioning of Parties and Ideological Shifts.” European Journal of Political Research 54 (1): 141–159. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, Laron K., Katsunori Seki, and Guy D. Whitten. 2016. “You’ve Got Some Explaining to Do: The Influence of Economic Conditions and Spatial Competition on Party Strategy.” Political Science Research and Methods 4 (1): 47–63. doi: 10.1017/psrm.2015.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolkenstein, Fabio. 2018. “Intra-Party Democracy Beyond Aggregation.” Party Politics 24 (4): 323–334. doi: 10.1177/1354068816655563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar