The welfare reality check: how policy-specific information influences public responsiveness

References

• Andersson, Dennis, Anna Bendz, and Helena Olofsdotter Stensöta. 2018. “The Limits of a Commitment? Public Responses to Asylum Policy in Sweden Over Time.” Scandinavian Political Studies 41 (3): 307–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barabas, Jason. 2011. “Book Review on Soroka, Stuart N; Wlezien, C: Degrees of Democracy: Politics, Public Opinion and Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.” Public Opinion Quarterly 75 (1): 192–200.
   Google Scholar
• Barabas, Jason, and Jennifer Jerit. 2009. “Estimating the Causal Effects of Media Coverage on Policy-Specific Knowledge.” American Journal of Political Science 53 (1): 73–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendz, Anna. 2015. “Paying Attention to Politics: Public Responsiveness and Welfare Policy Change.” Policy Studies Journal 43 (3): 309–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendz, Anna. 2017. “Empowering the People. Public Responses to Welfare Policy Change.” Social Policy & Administration 51 (1): 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingham Powell, G. 2004. “The Chain of Responsiveness.” Journal of Democracy 15 (4): 91–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branham, Alexander J. 2018. “Partisan Feedback. Heterogeneity in Opinion Responsiveness.” Public Opinion Quarterly 82 (4): 625–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busemeyer, Marius R., Aurélien Abrassart, Spyridoula Nezi, and Roula Nezi. 2019. “Beyond Positive and Negative: New Perspectives on Feedback Effects in Public Opinion on the Welfare State.” British Journal of Political Science. Advance online publication. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123418000534
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Andrea Louise. 2003. How Policies Make Citizens: Senior Political Activism and the American Welfare State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Andrea Louise. 2012. “Policy Makes Mass Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 15: 333–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vreese, Claes, H., and Hajo Boomgaarden. 2006. “News, Political Knowledge and Participation: The Differential Effects of News Media Exposure on Political Knowledge and Participation.” Acta Politica 41: 317–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delli Carpini, Michael, and Scott Keeter. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why it Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, Christopher, and Christopher Faricy. 2011. “Social Policy and Public Opinion: How the Ideological Direction of Spending Influences Public Mood.” The Journal of Politics 73 (4): 1095–1110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enns, Peter K., and Christopher Wlezien, eds. 2011. Who Gets Represented? New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Esaiasson, Peter, and Christopher Wlezien. 2017. “Advances in the Study of Democratic Responsiveness: An Introduction.” Comparative Political Studie 50 (6): 699–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilens, Martin. 2001. “Political Ignorance and Collective Policy Preferences.” The American Political Science Review 95 (2): 379–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jæger, Mads Meier. 2009. “United but Divided: Welfare Regimes and the Level and Variance in Public Support for Redistribution.” European Sociological Review 25 (6): 723–737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings, Will. 2009. “The Public Thermostat, Political Responsiveness and Error-Correction: Border Control and Asylum in Britain, 1994-2007.” Bristish Journal of Political Science 39 (4): 847–870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, Martin, Paul Brace, and Kevin Arceneaux. 2005. “Public Opinion and Dynamic Representation in the American States: The Case of Environmental Attitudes.” Social Science Quarterly 86 (1): 87–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuklinski, James H, Paul J. Quirk, Jennifer Jerit, David Schwieder, and Robert F. Rich 2000. “Misinformation and the Currency of Democratic Citizenship.” The Journal of Politics 62 (3): 790–816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumlin, Staffan, and Bo Rothstein. 2005. “Making and Breaking Social Capital: The Impact of Welfare-State Institutions.” Comparative Political Studies 38 (4): 339–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumlin, Staffan, and Isabelle Stadelmann-Steffen. 2014a. “Citizens, Policy Feedback and European Welfare States.” In How Welfare States Shape the Democratic Public: Policy Feedback, Participation, Voting, and Attitudes, edited by Staffan Kumlin and Isabelle Stadelmann-Steffen, 3–19. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kumlin, Staffan, and Isabelle Stadelmann-Steffen eds. 2014b. How Welfare States Shape the Democratic Public. Policy Feedback, Participation, Voting and Attitudes. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, Erik Gahner. 2018. “Policy Feedback Effects on Mass Publics: A Quantitative Review.” Policy Studies Journal 47 (2): 372–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeper, Thomas J, and Rune Slothuus. 2014. “Political Parties, Motivated Reasoning and Public Opinion Formation.” Advances in Political Psychology 35 (1): 129–156.
   Google Scholar
• Lerman, Amy, E., and Katherine T. McCabe. 2017. “Personal Experience and Public Opinion: A Theory and Test of Conditional Policy Feedback.” The Journal of Politics 79 (2): 624–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levendusky, Matthew, S. 2011. “Rethinking the Role of Political Information.” Public Opinion Quarterly 75 (1): 42–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCombs, Maxwell, and D. L. Shaw. 1972. “The Agenda Setting Function of Mass Media.” Public Opinion Quarterly 36: 176–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mettler, Suzanne. 2005. “The Creation of the G.I. Bill of Rights of 1944: Melding Social and Participatory Citizenship Ideals.” Journal of Policy History 17 (4): 345–374.
   Google Scholar
• Mettler, Suzanne, and Joe Soss. 2004. “The Consequences for Public Policy for Democratic Citizenship: Bridging Policy Studies and Mass Politics.” Perspective on Politics 2: 55–73.
   Google Scholar
• Nadeau, Richard, Neil Nevitte, Elisabeth Gidengil, and André Blais. 2008. “Election Campaigns as Information Campaigns: Who Learns What and Does it Matter?” Political Communication 25 (3): 229–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuner, Fabian G., Stuart Soroka, and Christopher Wlezien. 2019. “Mass Media as a Source of Public Responsiveness.” International Journal of Press/Politics 24 (3): 269–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oscarsson, Henrik, and Lauri Rapeli. 2018. “Citizens and Political Sophistication.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedias: Politics, edited by Russel Dalton. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Page, Benjamin I., and Robert Y. Shapiro. 1992. The Rational Public. Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soroka, Stuart, N. 2003. “Media, Public Opinion, and Foreign Policy.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 8 (1): 27–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soroka, Stuart N., and Christopher Wlezien. 2004. “Opinion Representation and Policy Feedback: Canada in Comparative Perspective.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 37 (3): 539–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soroka, Stuart N., and Christopher Wlezien. 2010. Degrees of Democracy. Politics, Public Opinion, and Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soss, Joe. 1999. “Lessons of Welfare: Policy Design, Political Learning, and Political Action.” American Political Science Review 93 (2): 363–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soss, Joe, and Sanford F. Schram. 2007. “A Public Transformed? Welfare Reform as Policy Feedback.” American Political Science Review 101 (1): 111–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stimson, James A., Michael Mackuen, and Robert S. Erikson. 1995. “Dynamic Representation.” American Political Science Review 89 (3): 543–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolle, Dietlind, and Elisabeth Gidengil. 2010. “What Do Women Really Know? A Gendered Analysis of Varieties of Political Knowledge.” Perspectives on Politics 8: 93–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, Kathrin. 2010. “The Thermostatic Model of Representation Reviewed.” European Political Science 9: 533–543.
   Google Scholar
• Ünvera, Özgün, Tuba Bircan, and Ides Nicaise. 2020. “Opinion-policy Correspondence in Public Provision and Financing of Childcare in Europe.” International Journal of Educational Research 101: 2–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, Christopher J., and Martijn Schoonvelde. 2018. “It Takes Three: How Mass Media Coverage Conditions Public Responsiveness to Policy Outputs in the United States.” Social Science Quarterly 99 (5): 1627–1636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wlezien, Christopher. 1995. “The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (4): 981–1000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wlezien, Christopher, and Stuart N. Soroka. 2012. “Political Institutions and the Opinion–Policy Link.” West European Politics 35 (6): 1407–1432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wlezien, Christopher, and Stuart Soroka. 2019. “Trends in Public Support for Welfare Spending: How the Economy Matters.” British Journal of Political Science. Advance online publication. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123419000103.
   Google Scholar
• Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar