District magnitude, electoral coordination, and legislative fragmentation

References

• Ames, Barry. 2002. The Deadlock of Democracy in Brazil. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Angrist, Joshua D., and Jörn-Stefen Pischke. 2009. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. 1st ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Autor, David H. 2003. “Outsourcing at Will: The Contribution of Unjust Dismissal Doctrine to the Growth of Employment Outsourcing.” Journal of Labor Economics 21 (1): 1–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, Kenneth. 2002. “The Endogeneity Problem in Electoral Studies: A Critical Re- Examination of Duverger's Mechanical Effect.” Electoral Studies 21 (1): 35–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, Kenneth. 2007. “Electoral Laws as Political Consequences: Explaining the Origins and Change of Electoral Institutions.” Annual Review of Political Science 10 (1): 363–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, Andre, Maxime Heroux-Legault, Laura Stephenson, William Cross, and Elisabeth Gidengil. 2012. “Assessing the Psychological and Mechanical Impact of Electoral Rules: A Quasi-Experiment.” Electoral Studies 31 (4): 829–837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, William Roberts, and Matt Golder. 2006. “Rehabilitating Duverger's Theory: Testing the Mechanical and Strategic Modifying Effects of Electoral Laws.” Comparative Political Studies 39 (6): 679–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colomer, Josep M. 2005. “It's Parties That Choose Electoral Systems (or, Duverger's Laws Upside Down).” Political Studies 53 (1): 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crisp, Brian F., and Betul Demirkaya. 2020. “Strategic Entry and Strategic Voting in Majoritarian Systems.” The Journal of Politics 82 (1): 57–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crisp, Brian F., Joshua D. Potter, and John J. W. Lee. 2012. “Entry and Coordination in Mixed-Member Systems: A Controlled Comparison Testing the Contamination Hypothesis.” The Journal of Politics 74 (2): 571–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Rosa, Róger Martins. 2006. “A Controvérsia Da Fixação Do Número de Vereadores Pelo Tribunal Superior Eleitoral.” Âmbito Jurídico IX (25). https://ambitojuridico.com.br/cadernos/direito-constitucional/a-controversia-da-fixacao-do-numero-de-vereadores-pelo-tribunal-superior-eleitoral/.
   Google Scholar
• Duverger, Maurice. 1954. Political Parties: Their Organisation and Activity in the Modern State. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Fiva, Jon H., and Olle Folke. 2016. “Mechanical and Psychological Effects of Electoral Reform.” British Journal of Political Science 46 (02): 265–279.
   Google Scholar
• Folha de São Paulo. 2004. Eleições 2004: TSE reduz número de vereadores em 15%. Accessed January 2, 2021. https://bit.ly/3j6CS0Q.
   Google Scholar
• Fong, Christian, Chad Hazlett, and Kosuke Imai. 2018. “Covariate Balancing Propensity Score for a Continuous Treatment: Application to the Efficacy of Political Advertisements.” Ann. Appl. Stat 12 (1): 156–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujiwara, Thomas. 2011. “A Regression Discontinuity Test of Strategic Voting and Duverger's Law.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 6 (3-4): 197–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Górecki, Maciej A, and Paula Kukołowicz. 2018. “Electoral Formula, Legal Threshold and the Number of Parties: A Natural Experiment.” Party Politics 24 (6): 617–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grofman, Bernard, and Peter Selb. 2011. “Turnout and the (Effective) Number of Parties at the National and District Levels: A Puzzle-Solving Approach.” Party Politics 17 (1): 93–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerzoni Filho, Gilberto. 2010. “Da Constituinte à Emenda Constitucional n. 58, de 2009 - O Poder Judiciário, o Congresso Nacional e a Composição Das Câmaras de Vereadores.” Revista de Informação Legislativa 47: 187.
   Google Scholar
• IDEA. 2018. “Electoral System Design Database.” https://www.idea.int/datatools/data/electoral-system-design.
   Google Scholar
• Jornal da Globo. 2004. Menos vereadores. Accessed January 2, 2021. https://glo.bo/3pEcGgx.
   Google Scholar
• Laakso, Markku, and Rein Taagepera. 1979. ““The “Effective” Number of Parties: “A Measure with Application to West Europe”.” Comparative Political Studies; Beverley Hills.” Calif 12 (1): 3–27.
   Google Scholar
• Lago, Ignacio. 2012. “Strategic Voting in Proportional Representation Systems: Evidence from a Natural Experiment.” Party Politics 18 (5): 653–665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leys, Colin. 1959. “Models, Theories, and the Theory of Political Parties.” Political Studies 7 (2): 127–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipset, Seymour Martin, and Stein Rokkan. 1967. Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lucardi, Adrián. 2019. “The Effect of District Magnitude on Electoral Outcomes: Evidence from Two Natural Experiments in Argentina.” British Journal of Political Science 49 (2): 557–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainwaring, Scott. 1999. Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, Robert G., and Ethan Scheiner. 2012. Electoral Systems and Political Context: How the Effects of Rules Vary Across new and Established Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neto, Octavio Amorim, and Gary W. Cox. 1997. “Electoral Institutions, Cleavage Structures, and the Number of Parties.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (1): 149–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ordeshook, Peter C., and Olga V. Shvetsova. 1994. “Ethnic Heterogeneity, District Magnitude, and the Number of Parties.” American Journal of Political Science 38 (1): 100–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellicer, Miquel, and Eva Wegner. 2014. “The Mechanical and Psychological Effects of Legal Thresholds.” Electoral Studies 33: 258–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remmer, Karen L. 2008. “The Politics of Institutional Change: Electoral Reform in Latin America, 1978|2002.” Party Politics 14 (1): 5–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renwick, Alan, and Jean-Benoit Pilet. 2016. Faces on the Ballot: The Personalization of Electoral Systems in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sartori, Giovanni. 1968. “Political Development and Political Engineering.” Public Policy XVII: 261–298.
   Google Scholar
• Shugart, Matthew S. 1992. “Electoral Reform in Systems of Proportional Representation.” European Journal of Political Research 21 (3): 207–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, Matthew M. 2013. “Was Duverger Correct? Single-Member District Election Outcomes in Fifty-Three Countries.” British Journal of Political Science 43 (1): 201–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, Matthew M. 2015. “Does Increasing District Magnitude Increase the Number of Parties? Evidence from Spain, 1982-2011.” Electoral Studies Complete 38: 118–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taagepera, Rein. 1999. “The Number of Parties as a Function of Heterogeneity and Electoral System.” Comparative Political Studies 32 (5): 531–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taagepera, Rein, and Matthew S. Shugart. 1991. Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zucco, Cesar, and Jairo M. Nicolau. 2016. “Trading Old Errors for New Errors? The Impact of Electronic Voting Technology on Party Label Votes in Brazil.” Electoral Studies 43 (September): 10–20.
   Google Scholar