When the partisan becomes personal: Mayoral Incumbency Effects in Buenos Aires, 1983–2019

References

• Ascencio, Sergio J. 2021. “Nomination Rules and the Calculus of Mobilization: Theory and Evidence from Mexico.” Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, Tiffany D., Carolina Tchintian, and Santiago Alles. 2017. “Assessing Ballot Structure and Split Ticket Voting: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment.” The Journal of Politics 79 (2): 439–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battocchio, Matias. 2018. “La Ventaja del Oficialismo en las Elecciones Municipales de la Provincia de Buenos Aires.” Económica 64: 133–171.
   Google Scholar
• Broockman, David E. 2009. “Do Congressional Candidates Have Reverse Coattails? Evidence from a Regression Discontinuity Design.” Political Analysis 17 (4): 418–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calonico, Sebastian, Matías D. Cattaneo, and Rocío Titiunik. 2014. “Robust Nonparametric Confidence Intervals for Regression-Discontinuity Designs.” Econometrica 82 (6): 2295–2326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvo, Ernesto, and Marcelo Escolar. 2005. La Nueva Política de Partidos en la Argentina. Crisis Política, Realineamientos Partidarios y Reforma Electoral. Buenos Aires: PENT-Prometeo.
   Google Scholar
• Calvo, Ernesto, and Maria Victoria Murillo. 2013. “When Parties Meet Voters: Assessing Political Linkages Through Partisan Networks and Distributive Expectations in Argentina and Chile.” Comparative Political Studies 46 (7): 851–882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camp, Edwin. 2017. “Cultivating Effective Brokers: A Party Leader’s Dilemma.” British Journal of Political Science 47 (3): 521–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlin, Ryan E., Jonathan Hartlyn, Timothy Hellwig, Gregory J. Love, Cecilia Martínez-Gallardo, and Matthew M. Singer. 2019. “Executive Approval Database 2.0.” http://www.executiveapproval.org/
   Google Scholar
• Cattaneo, Matías D., Brigham R. Frandsen, and Rocío Titiunik. 2015. “Randomization Inference in the Regression Discontinuity Design: An Application to Party Advantages in the U.S. Senate.” Journal of Causal Inference 3 (1): 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherny, Nicolás, Valentín Figueroa, and Gerardo Scherlis. 2018. “Quién Nomina a los Legisladores? La Conformación de las Listas de Candidatos Para la Cámara de Diputados en Argentina.” Revista SAAP 12 (2): 215–248.
   Google Scholar
• Cirone, Alexandra, Gary W. Cox, and Jon H. Fiva. 2021. “Seniority-based Nominations and Political Careers.” American Political Science Review 115 (1): 234–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clerici, Paula, Facundo Cruz, and Lara Goyburu. 2020. “¿Fuego Amigo? El Desgaste de las Primarias Competitivas en la Provincia de Buenos Aires.” Revista de Ciencia Política (Santiago) 40 (1): 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, Gary W., Jon H. Fiva, Daniel M. Smith, and Rune J. Sørensen. 2021. “Moral Hazard in Electoral Teams: List Rank and Campaign Effort.” Journal of Public Economics 200: 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlgaard, Jens Olav. 2016. “You Just Made It: Individual Incumbency Advantage Under Proportional Representation.” Electoral Studies 44: 319–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degiustti, Danilo, and Gerardo Scherlis. 2020. “Desandando Caminos. Reequilibrio de Fuerzas y Alternancia en el Sistema Partidario Argentino, 2015-2019.” Colombia Internacional 103: 139–169.
   Google Scholar
• Engstrom, Erik J., and Samuel Kernell. 2005. “Manufactured Responsiveness: The Impact of State Electoral Laws on Unified Party Control of the Presidency and House of Representatives, 1840-1940.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (3): 531–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erikson, Robert S., Olle Folke, and James M. Snyder. 2015. “A Gubernatorial Helping Hand? How Governors Affect Presidential Elections.” The Journal of Politics 77 (2): 491–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erikson, Robert S., and Rocío Titiunik. 2015. “Using Regression Discontinuity to Uncover the Personal Incumbency Advantage.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 10 (1): 101–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feierherd, Germán. 2020. “How Mayors Hurt Their Presidential Ticket: Party Brands and Incumbency Spillovers in Brazil.” The Journal of Politics 82 (1): 195–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folke, Olle, and James M. Snyder. 2012. “Gubernatorial Midterm Slumps.” American Journal of Political Science 56 (4): 931–948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, Anthony, and Andrew B. Hall. 2014. “Disentangling the Personal and Partisan Incumbency Advantages: Evidence from Close Elections and Term Limits.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 9 (4): 501–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervasoni, Carlos. 2018. “Argentina’s Declining Party System: Fragmentation, Denationalization, Factionalization, Personalization, and Increasing Fluidity.” In Party Systems in Latin America: Institutionalization, Decay, and Collapse, edited by Scott Mainwaring, 255–290. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, Edward L. 2005. “Boundary Control: Subnational Authoritarianism in Democratic Countries.” World Politics 58 (1): 101–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollyer, James R, Marko Klašnja, and Rocío Titiunik. Forthcoming. “Parties as Disciplinarians: Charisma and Commitment Problems in Programmatic Campaigning.” American Journal of Political Science 66 (1): 75–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, Mark P. 1997. “Federalism and the Number of Parties in Argentine Congressional Elections.” The Journal of Politics 59 (2): 538–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klašnja, Marko. 2015. “Corruption and the Incumbency Disadvantage: Theory and Evidence.” The Journal of Politics 77 (4): 928–942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klašnja, Marko, and Rocío Titiunik. 2017. “The Incumbency Curse: Weak Parties, Term Limits, and Unfulfilled Accountability.” American Political Science Review 111 (1): 129–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotakorpi, Kaisa, Panu Poutvaara, and Marko Tervio. 2017. “Returns to Office in National and Local Politics: A Bootstrap Method and Evidence from Finland.” The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 33 (3): 413–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, David S. 2008. “Randomized Experiments from Non-Random Selection in U.S. House Elections.” Journal of Econometrics 142 (2): 675–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes da Fonseca, Mariana. 2017. “Identifying the Source of Incumbency Advantage Through a Constitutional Reform.” American Journal of Political Science 61 (3): 657–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucardi, Adrián, and Guillermo Rosas. 2016. “Is the Incumbent Curse the Incumbent’s Fault? Strategic Behavior and Negative Incumbency Effects in Young Democracies.” Electoral Studies 44: 66–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupu, Noam. 2016. “Building Party Brands in Argentina and Brazil.” In Challenges of Party-Building in Latin America, edited by Jorge Domínguez, Steven Levitsky, Brandon Van Dyck, and James Loxtonin, 76–99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lupu, Noam, and Susan C. Stokes. 2009. “The Social Bases of Political Parties in Argentina, 1912–2003.” Latin American Research Review 44 (1): 58–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micozzi, Juan Pablo, and Adrián Lucardi. 2021. “How Valuable Is a Legislative Seat? Long-Term Incumbency Effects in the Argentine Chamber of Deputies.” Political Science Research and Methods 9 (2): 414–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novaes, Lucas M. 2018. “Disloyal Brokers and Weak Parties.” American Journal of Political Science 62 (1): 84–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Núñez, Lucas. 2018. “Do Clientelistic Machines Affect Electoral Outcomes? Mayoral Incumbency as a Proxy for Machine Prowess.” Electoral Studies 55: 109–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveros, Virginia. 2021. Patronage at Work: Public Jobs and Political Services in Argentina. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, Michael P. 2020. “The Direct Primary and the Incumbency Advantage in the US House of Representatives.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 15 (4): 483–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rau, Eli, Radha Sarkar, and Susan Stokes. n.d. “Parties and Mobilization in Referendums.” Unpublished typescript, Yale University.
   Google Scholar
• Rosas, Guillermo, and Adrián Lucardi. 2020. “Jumping Ship or Jumping on the Bandwagon: When Do Local Politicians Support National Candidates?” Political Science Research and Methods 8 (1): 60–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz Nicolini, Juan Pablo. 2020. “polAr: Argentina Political Analysis.” R Package Version 0.2.0 (dev). https://electorarg.github.io/polAr/.
   Google Scholar
• Samuels, David J. 2000. “Concurrent Elections, Discordant Results: Presidentialism, Federalism, and Governance in Brazil.” Comparative Politics 33 (1): 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiumerini, Luis. 2017. “Imperfect Evaluations and Incumbency Effects.” Working Paper. Kellogg Institute for International Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Schiumerini, Luis, and María Page. 2012. “El Efecto “Cancha Inclinada”: Ventajas del Oficialismo en la Política de las Provincias Argentinas.” CIPPEC, Documento de Políticas Publicas / Análisis #115.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, Susan C., Thad Dunning, Marcelo Nazareno, and Valeria Brusco. 2013. Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suárez-Cao, Julieta. 2021. “Squaring the Circle: The Consolidation of Incumbency Advantage in the Argentine Provincial Elections of 2019.” Regional & Federal Studies 31 (3): 313–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uppal, Yogesh. 2009. “The Disadvantaged Incumbents: Estimating Incumbency Effects in Indian State Legislatures.” Public Choice 138 (1-2): 9–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitz-Shapiro, Rebecca. 2012. “What Wins Votes: Why Some Politicians Opt Out of Clientelism.” American Journal of Political Science 56 (3): 568–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar