The impact of local protests on political elite communication: evidence from Fridays for Future in Germany

References

• Baumann, Markus, Marc Debus, and Tristan Klingelhöfer. 2017. “Keeping One’s Seat: The Competitiveness of MP Renomination in Mixed-Member Electoral Systems.” The Journal of Politics 79: 979–994. doi:10.1086/690945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, Kenneth, Watanabe, Kohei, Wang, Haiyan, Nulty, Paul, Obeng, Adam, Müller, Stefan, Matsuo, Akitaka. 2018. “quanteda: An R Package for the Quantitative Analysis of Textual Data.” Journal of Open Source Software 3: 774. doi:10.21105/joss.00774
   Google Scholar
• Bernardi, Luca, Daniel Bischof, and Ruud Wouters. 2021. “The Public, the Protester, and the Bill: Do Legislative Agendas Respond to Public Opinion Signals?” Journal of European Public Policy 28: 289–310. doi:10.1080/13501763.2020.1729226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borbáth, Endre, and Swen Hutter. 2021. “Protesting Parties in Europe: A Comparative Analysis.” Party Politics 27: 896–908. doi:10.1177/1354068820908023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowler, Shaun. 2017. “Trustees, Delegates, and Responsiveness in Comparative Perspective.” Comparative Political Studies 50: 766–793. doi:10.1177/0010414015626447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castanho Silva, Bruno, and Sven-Oliver Proksch. 2022. “Politicians Unleashed? Political Communication on Twitter and in Parliament in Western Europe.” Political Science Research and Methods 10:776–792. doi:10.1017/psrm.2021.36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffé, Hilde. 2018. “MPs’ Representational Focus in MMP Systems. A Comparison between Germany and New Zealand.” Representation 54: 367–389. doi:10.1080/00344893.2018.1539030
   Google Scholar
• Downs, Anthony. 1957. “An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy.” Journal of Political Economy 65: 135–150. doi:10.1086/257897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Union. 2015. EuroVoc Thesaurus. Volume 1, Part B. Luxembourg: Publications Office http://bookshop.europa.eu/uri?target=EUB:NOTICE:OAAJ13002:EN:HTML.
   Google Scholar
• Fassiotto, Magali, and Sarah A. Soule. 2017. “Loud and Clear: The Effect of Protest Signals on Coongressional Attention.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 22: 17–38. doi:10.17813/1086-671X-22-1-17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franzmann, Simon T., Heiko Giebler, and Thomas Poguntke. 2020. “It’s no Longer the Economy, Stupid! Issue Yield at the 2017 German Federal Election.” West European Politics 43: 610–638. doi:10.1080/01402382.2019.1655963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamson, William A., and Gadi Wolfsfeld. 1993. “Movements and Media as Interacting Systems.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 528: 114–125. doi:10.1177/0002716293528001009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gause, LaGina. 2022. “Revealing Issue Salience via Costly Protest: How Legislative Behavior Following Protest Advantages Low-Resource Groups.” British Journal of Political Science 52 (1): 259–279. doi:10.1017/S0007123420000423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, Sara B., and Robert Klemmensen. 2008. “Government Responsiveness and Political Competition in Comparative Perspective.” Comparative Political Studies 41: 309–337. doi:10.1177/0010414006297169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutter, Swen, Edgar Grande, and Hanspeter Kriesi, eds. 2016. Politicising Europe: Integration and Mass Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutter, Swen, Hanspeter Kriesi, and Jasmine Lorenzini. 2018. “Social Movements in Interaction with Political Parties.” In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. 2nd ed., edited by David A. Snow, Sarah A. Soule, Hanspeter Kriesi, and Holly J. McCammon, 322–337. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hutter, Swen, and Rens Vliegenthart. 2018. “Who Responds to Protest? Protest Politics and Party Responsiveness in Western Europe.” Party Politics 24: 358–369. doi:10.1177/1354068816657375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsen, Rune. 2011. “A Platform for Individualized Campaigning? Social Media and Parliamentary Candidates in the 2009 Norwegian Election Campaign.” Policy & Internet 3: 1–25. doi:10.2202/1944-2866.1137
   Google Scholar
• Kilgo, Danielle K., and Summer Harlow. 2019. “Protests, Media Coverage, and a Hierarchy of Social Struggle.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 24: 508–530. doi:10.1177/1940161219853517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, Brayden G., Keith G. Bentele, and Sarah A. Soule. 2007. “Protest and Policymaking: Explaining Fluctuation in Congressional Attention to Rights Issues, 1960–1986.” Social Forces 86:137–163. doi:10.1353/sof.2007.0101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, Hanspeter, Bruno Wüest, Jasmine Lorenzini, Peter Makarov, Matthias Enggist, Klaus Rothenhäusler, Thomas Kurer, et al. 2020. “PolDem-Protest Dataset 30 European Countries, Version 1.”
   Google Scholar
• Manow, Philip. 2013. “Mixed Rules, Different Roles? An Analysis of the Typical Pathways Into the Bundestag and of MPs’ Parliamentary Behaviour.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 19: 287–308. doi:10.1080/13572334.2013.786962
   Google Scholar
• Martin, Lanny W., and Georg Vanberg. 2008. “Coalition Government and Political Communication.” Political Research Quarterly 61: 502–516. doi:10.1177/1065912907308348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, Doug, and Yang Su. 2002. “The War at Home: Antiwar Protests and Congressional Voting, 1965 to 1973.” American Sociological Review, 696–721. doi:10.2307/3088914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Wakken E., and Donald E. Stokes. 1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” American Political Science Review 57: 45–56. doi:10.2307/1952717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitkin, Hanna F. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, G. Bingham. 2004. “Political Representation in Comparative Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 7:273–296. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.012003.104815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proksch, Sven-Oliver, Will Lowe, Jens Wäckerle, and Stuart Soroka. 2019. “Multilingual Sentiment Analysis: A New Approach to Measuring Conflict in Legislative Speeches.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 44:97–131. doi:10.1111/lsq.12218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proksch, Sven-Oliver, and Jonathan B. Slapin. 2015. The Politics of Parliamentary Debate: Parties, Rebels and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rauh, Christian. 2015. “Communicating Supranational Governance? The Salience of EU Affairs in the German Bundestag, 1991–2013.” European Union Politics 16: 116–138. doi:10.1177/1465116514551806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauh, Christian, and Jan Schwalbach. 2020. “The ParlSpeech V2 Data Set: Full-Text Corpora of 6.3 Million Parliamentary Speeches in the Key Legislative Chambers of Nine Representative Democracies.”
   Google Scholar
• Roukounis, Charalampos Nikolaos, and Vassilios A. Tsihrintzis. 2022. “Indices of Coastal Vulnerability to Climate Change: A Review.” Environmental Processes 9: 29. doi:10.1007/s40710-022-00577-9.
   Google Scholar
• Schürmann, Lennart. 2023. “Do Competitive Districts get More Political Attention? Strategic use of Geographic Representation During Campaign and non-Campaign Periods.” Electoral Studies 81: 102575. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schürmann, Lennart, and Sebastian Stier. 2023. “Who Represents the Constituency? Online Political Communication by Members of Parliament in the German Mixed-Member Electoral System.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 48: 219–234. doi:10.1111/lsq.12379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommer, Moritz, Sebastian Haunss, Beth Gharrity Gardner, Michael Neuber, and Dieter Rucht. 2020. “Wer demonstriert da? Ergebnisse von Befragungen bei Großprotesten von Fridays for Future in Deutschland im März und November 2019.” In Fridays for Future – Die Jugend gegen den Klimawandel: Konturen der weltweiten Protestbewegung, edited by Sebastian Haunss and Moritz Sommer, 15–66. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Steinhardt, H. Christoph. 2017. “Discursive Accommodation: Popular Protest and Strategic Elite Communication in China.” European Political Science Review 9:539–560. doi:10.1017/S1755773916000102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stier, Sebastian, Arnim Bleier, Malte Bonart, Fabian Mörsheim, Mahdi Bohlouli, Margarita Nizhegorodov, Lisa Posch, et al. 2018a. “Systematically Monitoring Social Media: The Case of the German Federal Election 2017.” GESIS Papers 2018/04:25.
   Google Scholar
• Stier, Sebastian, Arnim Bleier, Haiko Lietz, and Markus Strohmaier. 2018b. “Election Campaigning on Social Media: Politicians, Audiences, and the Mediation of Political Communication on Facebook and Twitter.” Political Communication 35: 50–74. doi:10.1080/10584609.2017.1334728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarrow, Sidney, and Charles Tilly. 2009. “Contentious Politics and Social Movements.” In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, edited by Carles Boix and Susan C. Stokes, 435–460. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ver Hoef, M. Jay, and Peter L. Boveng. 2007. “Quasi-Poisson vs. Negative Binomial Regression: How Should We Model Overdispersed Count Data?” Ecology 88: 2766–2772. doi:10.1890/07-0043.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walgrave, Stefaan, and Rens Vliegenthart. 2012. “The Complex Agenda-Setting Power of Protest: Demonstrations, Media, Parliament, Government, and Legislation in Belgium, 1993-2000.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 17: 129–156. doi:10.17813/maiq.17.2.pw053m281356572h
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, Sophia J., Chris Zepeda-Millán, and Michael Jones-Correa. 2014. “Spatial and Temporal Proximity: Examining the Effects of Protests on Political Attitudes.” American Journal of Political Science 58: 433–448. doi:10.1111/ajps.12060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasow, Omar. 2020. “Agenda Seeding: How 1960s Black Protests Moved Elites, Public Opinion and Voting.” American Political Science Review 114: 638–659. doi:10.1017/S000305542000009X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wouters, Ruud. 2019. “The Persuasive Power of Protest. How Protest Wins Public Support.” Social Forces 98: 403–426. doi:10.1093/sf/soy110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wouters, Ruud, Julie Sevenans, and Rens Vliegenthart. 2021. “Selective Deafness of Political Parties: Strategic Responsiveness to Media, Protest and Real-World Signals on Immigration in Belgian Parliament.” Parliamentary Affairs 74: 27–51. doi:10.1093/pa/gsz024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wouters, Ruud, Luna Staes, and Peter Van Aelst. 2022. “Word on the Street: Politicians, Mediatized Street Protest, and Responsiveness on Social Media.” Information, Communication & Society 0: 1–30. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2022.2140013
   Google Scholar
• Wouters, Ruud, and Stefaan Walgrave. 2017. “Demonstrating Power: How Protest Persuades Political Representatives.” American Sociological Review 82: 361–383. doi:10.1177/0003122417690325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wüest, Bruno, and Jasmine Lorenzini. 2020. “External Validation of Protest Event Analysis.” In Contention in Times of Crisis: Recession and Political Protest in Thirty European Countries, edited by Bruno Wüest, Hanspeter Kriesi, Jasmine Lorenzini, and Silja Hausermann, 49–76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zittel, Thomas. 2018. “Electoral Systems in Context: Germany.” In The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Systems, edited by Erik S. Herron, Robert J. Pekkanen, and Matthew S. Shugart, 781–801. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zittel, Thomas, Dominic Nyhuis, and Markus Baumann. 2019. “Geographic Representation in Party-Dominated Legislatures: A Quantitative Text Analysis of Parliamentary Questions in the German Bundestag.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 44:681–711. doi:10.1111/lsq.12238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar