Driver behaviours on rural highways with and without curbs – a driving simulator based study

References

• AASHTO. (2004). A policy on geometric design of highways and streets: 2004 (5th ed.). Washington, D.C.: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO (2006). Roadside design guide. Washington, D.C.: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• Alm, H. (1995). Driving simulator as research tools: A validation study based on the VTI driving simulator. Drive II V2065: GEM Validation Studies. Linköping, Sweden: VTI. Reference GEM/TR/TRC/MK950327, 9.
   Google Scholar
• Baek, J., Hummer, J., Williams, B., & Cunningham, C. (2006). Reasonable speed limits on suburban multilane highways with curbs. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1969, 10–17.
   Google Scholar
• Bella, F. (2005). Operating speed predicting models on two-lane rural roads from driving simulation. Proceedings of the 84th Annual Meeting Transportation Research Record, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Bella, F. (2008). Driving simulator for speed research on two-lane rural roads. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40, 1078–1087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, C.R. (1994). A speed prediction model for rural two-lane highways. New Zealand: The University of Auckland.
   Google Scholar
• Bittner, A., Simsek, O., Levison, W., & Campbell, J. (2002). On-road versus simulator data in driver model development driver performance model experience. Transportation Research Record: Journal of Transportation Research Board, 1803, 38–44.
   Google Scholar
• Blana, E. (1996). Driving simulator validation studies: A literature review (Working Paper 480). Leeds: Institute of Transport Studies, University of Leeds.
   Google Scholar
• Boer, E., Girshik, A., Yamamura, T., & Kuge, N. (2000). Experiencing the same road twice: A driver-centred comparison between simulation and reality. Proceedings of driving simulation conference DSC 2000. Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Broughton, K.L.M., Switzer, F., & Scott, D. (2007). Car following decisions under three visibility conditions and two speeds tested with a driving simulator. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 39, 106–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, K., Carlson, P., Brewer, M., & Wooldridge, M. (2001). Design factors that affect driver speed on suburban streets. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1751, 18–25.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, K., Shaw-Pin, M., Marcus, B., Paul, C., & Mark, D.W. (2005). Exploration of the relationships between operating speed and roadway features on tangent sections. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 131, 261–269.
   Google Scholar
• Harms, L. (1994). Driving performance on a real road and in a driving simulator: results of a validations study. Vision in Vehicles V, Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Hurwitz, D.S., Knodler, Jr. M.A., & Dulaski, D.M. (2005). Speed perception fidelity in a driving simulator environment. Proceedings of the Driving simulation conference, North America 2005 (DSC-NA 2005). Orlando, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Jan, T. (1998). Driving behaviour in a real and a simulated road tunnel - A validation study. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 30(4), 497–503.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, W.H., Ridders, S.Nd., & Brouwer, R.F.T. (2006). Roadside infrastructure for safer European roads: D02 summary of driver behaviour and driver interactions with roadside infrastructure. Project RISER, Gothenburg: European Community.
   Google Scholar
• Jessen, D., Schurr, K., McCoy, P., Pesti, G., & Huff, R. (2001). Operating speed prediction on crest vertical curves of rural two-lane highways in Nebraska. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1751, 67–75.
   Google Scholar
• NCHRP. (1974). Effect of curb geometry and location on vehicle behavior. (National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 150), Washington, D.C.: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• NCHRP. (2005). Recommended guidelines for curb and curb–barrier installations. (National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 537). Washington, D.C.: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Plaxico, C.A. (2002). Design guidelines for the use of curbs and curb/guardrail combinations along high-speed roadways. Worcester, MA: Worcester Polytechnic Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Simsek, O., Bittner, Jr. A.C., Levison, W.H., & Garness, S. (2000). Development of prototype driver model for highway design. Task B: Speed-Decision simulator experiment. Seattle, WA: Battelle Human Factors Transportation Center.
   Google Scholar
• Tornros, J. (1998). Driving behaviour in a real and a simulated road tunnel–a validation study. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 30, 497–503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Horst, R., & de Ridder, S. (2007). Influence of roadside infrastructure on driving behavior: Driving simulator study. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2018, 36–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, X., Abdel-Aty, M., Radwan, E., Wang, X., & Chilakapati, P. (2008). Validating a driving simulator using surrogate safety measures. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40, 274–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar