189
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A risk assessment study on accidents at French level crossings using Bayesian belief networks

&
Pages 162-172 | Received 26 Oct 2016, Accepted 16 Oct 2017, Published online: 27 Dec 2017

References

  • Chemweno, P., Pintelon, L., Van Horenbeek, A., & Muchiri, P. (2015). Development of a risk assessment selection methodology for asset maintenance decision making: An analytic network process (ANP) approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 170, 663–676.
  • Davey, J., Wallace, A., Stenson, N., & Freeman, J. (2008). The experiences and perceptions of heavy vehicle drivers and train drivers of dangers at railway level crossings. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40(3), 1217–1222.
  • EN 50126. (1999). Railway applications-The specification and demonstration of Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS). Brussels: British Standards Institution.
  • Ericson, C. A., & Li, C. (1999). Fault tree analysis. In Proceeding of the 17th International Systems Safety Conference. Orlando, FL. (pp. 1–9).
  • European Railway Agency. (2014). Railway safety performance in the European Union. Agency Regulation, 9(2), 881/2004/EC.
  • Evans, A. W. (2011a). Fatal accidents at railway level crossings in Great Britain 1946–2009. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 43(5), 1837–1845.
  • Evans, A. W. (2011b). Fatal train accidents on Europe's railways: 1980–2009. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 43(1), 391–401.
  • Ghazel, M. (2009). Using stochastic Petri nets for level-crossing collision risk assessment. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 10(4), 668–677.
  • Ghazel, M., & El-Koursi, E.-M. (2014). Two-half-barrier level crossings versus four-half-barrier level crossings: A comparative risk analysis study. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 15(3), 1123–1133.
  • GeNIe manual, version 2.1.1. (2017). Retrieved from http://support.bayesfusion.com/docs/
  • Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1982). The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology, 143(1), 29–36.
  • Hu, Y., Zhang, X., Ngai, E. W. T., Cai, R., & Liu, M. (2013). Software project risk analysis using Bayesian networks with causality constraints. Decision Support Systems, 56, 439–449.
  • Langseth, H., & Portinale, L. (2007). Bayesian networks in reliability. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 92, 92–108.
  • Leveson, N. G. (2011). Engineering a safer world: Systems thinking applied to safety. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Liu, B., Ghazel, M., & Toguyeni, A. (2016). Model-based diagnosis of multi-track level crossing plants. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 17(2), 546–556.
  • Malyshkina, N. V., & Mannering, F. L. (2009). Markov switching multinomial logic model: An application to accident-injury severities. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 41(4), 829–838.
  • Mekki, A., Ghazel, M., & Toguyeni, A. (2012). Validation of a new functional design of automatic protection systems at level crossings with model-checking techniques. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 13(2), 714–723.
  • Mozer, M. C. (2003). Optimizing classifier performance via an approximation to the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney statistic. In T. Fawcett & N. Mishra (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 848–855). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
  • Pourret, O., Naim, P., & Marcot, B. (2008). Bayesian networks: A practical guide to applications. USDA Forest Service, Wiley.
  • Powers, D. M. (2011). Evaluation: From precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlation. Journal of Machine Learning Technologies, 2(1), 37–63.
  • Read, G. J., Salmon, P. M., Lenné, M. G., & Stanton, N. A. (2016). Walking the line: Understanding pedestrian behaviour and risk at rail level crossings with cognitive work analysis. Applied Ergonomics, 53, 209–227.
  • Salmon, P. M., Read, G. J., Stanton, N. A., & Lenné, M. G. (2013). The crash at Kerang: Investigating systemic and psychological factors leading to unintentional non-compliance at rail level crossings. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 50, 1278–1288.
  • SNCF Réseau. (2011). Journée Mondiale de Sécurité Routière aux Passages à Niveau [World Conference of Road Safety at Level Crossings]. Retrieved from http://www.planetoscope.com/automobile/1271-nombre-de-collisions-aux-passages-a-niveau-en-france.html
  • SNCF Réseau. (2015). 8ème Journée Nationale de Sécurité Routière aux Passages à Niveau [8th National Conference of Road Safety at Level Crossings]. Retrieved from http://www.sncf-reseau.fr/fr/dossier-de-presse-8eme-journee-nationale-de-securite-routiere-aux-passages-a-niveau
  • SNCF. (2015). Research on the material of level crossing in 2014, France.
  • SNCF Réseau. (2010). Statistical analysis of accidents at LXs, France.
  • Stanton, N. A., & Walker, G. H. (2011). Exploring the psychological factors involved in the Ladbroke Grove rail accident. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 43(3), 1117–1127.
  • Tey, L. S., Ferreira, L., & Wallace, A. (2011). Measuring driver responses at railway level crossings. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 43(6), 2134–2141.
  • Weber, P., Medina-Oliva, G., Simon, C., & Iung, B. (2012). Overview on Bayesian networks applications for dependability, risk analysis and maintenance areas. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 25(4), 671–682.
  • Wilson, J. R. (2014). Fundamentals of systems ergonomics/human factors. Applied Ergonomics, 45, 5–13.
  • Woods, M. D., Slovak, R., & Schnieder, E. (2008). Safer European level crossing appraisal and technology: D4 - Report on cost benefit analysis methods for level crossings ( SELCAT-WP1-W02). London: Rail Safety and Standards Board.
  • Yehezkel, R., & Lerner, B. (2009). Bayesian network structure learning by recursive autonomy identification. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 10, 1527–1570.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.