Safety assessment of coordinated signalized intersections in a connected vehicle environment: a microsimulation approach

References

• Ahmed, H. U., Huang, Y., & Lu, P. (2021). A review of car-following models and modelling tools for human and autonomous-ready driving behaviors in micro-simulation. Smart Cities, 4(1), 314–335. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities4010019
   Google Scholar
• Alzoubaidi, M. (2022). Operational and safety performance assessment of innovative intersection and interchange designs in a connected vehicle environment [University of Wyoming]. www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/operational-safety-performance-assessment/docview/2668228282/se-2?accountid=14793
   Google Scholar
• Alzoubaidi, M., Al-Balbissi, A., Alzoubaidi, A., Alzoubaidi, A., Azzeh, B., Al-Mansour, A., & Farid, A. (2021). Connected vehicles versus conventional traffic congestion mitigation measures: An operational economic analysis. Azerbaijan Journal of High Performance Computing, 4(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.32010/26166127.2021.4.2.155.169
   Google Scholar
• Alzoubaidi, M., Molan, A., & Ksaibati, K. (2021). Comparing the efficiency of the super diverging diamond interchange to other innovative interchanges. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 106, 102174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2020.102174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alzoubaidi, M., & Zlatkovic, M. (2022). Investigating the safety performance of the new continuous green t-partial cloverleaf a interchange. Journal of Transportation Safety & Security, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439962.2022.2061095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvin, R., Khattak, A. J., Kamrani, M., & Rio-Torres, J. (2021). Safety evaluation of connected and automated vehicles in mixed traffic with conventional vehicles at intersections. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 25(2), 170–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/15472450.2020.1834392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cvijovic, Z., Zlatkovic, M., Stevanovic, A., & Song, Y. (2021). Multi-level conditional transit signal priority in connected vehicle environments. Put i Saobraćaj, 67(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.31075/PIS.67.02.01
   Google Scholar
• Cvijovic, Z., Zlatkovic, M., Stevanovic, A., & Yu, S. (2021). Conditional transit signal priority for connected transit vehicles. Transportation Research Board 100th Annual Meeting.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, A., Marchesini, P., Bijleveld, F., Kars, V., Drolenga, H., & Maarseveen, M. V. (2010). Do calculated conflicts in microsimulation model predict number of crashes?. Transportation Research Record, 2147(1), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.3141/2147-13
   Google Scholar
• Essa, M., & Sayed, T. (2015). Transferability of calibrated microsimulation model parameters for safety assessment using simulated conflicts. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 84, 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.08.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florida Department of Transportation. (2014). Traffic analysis handbook. Florida Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• French, L., & French, M. (2006). Benefits of signal timing optimization and ITS to corridor operations. Report Number FHWA–PA-2006-007-040214-P1. Harrisburg, PA: The Pennsylvania Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Gettman, D., Pu, L., Sayed, T., & Shelby, S. (2008). Surrogate safety assessment model and validation: Final report.
   Google Scholar
• Ghoul, T., & Sayed, T. (2021). Real-time signal-vehicle coupled control: an application of connected vehicle data to improve intersection safety. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 162, 106389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, F., Wang, X., & Abdel-Aty, M. A. (2010). Modeling signalized intersection safety with corridor-level spatial correlations. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 42(1), 84–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.07.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, Y., Sayed, T., Zheng, L., & Essa, M. (2021). An extreme value theory based approach for calibration of microsimulation models for safety analysis. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 106, 102172–102116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2020.102172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadi, M., Amine, K., Hunsanon, T., & Arafat, M. (2021). A red-light violation warning system in a connected vehicle simulation environment. Transportation Research Board 100th Annual Meeting, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, J., Powell, G., Yoon, R., Fikentscher, J., Doyle, C., Sade, D., Lukuc, M., Simons, J., & Wang, J. (2014). Vehicle-to-vehicle communications: readiness of V2V technology for application. Publication No. DOT HS 812 014. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, F., Liu, P., Yu, H., & Wang, W. (2013). Identifying if VISSIM simulation model and SSAM provide reasonable estimates for field measured traffic conflicts at signalized intersections. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 50, 1014–1024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2012.08.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jadaan, K., Zeater, S., & Abukhalil, Y. (2017). Connected vehicles: An innovative transport technology. Procedia Engineering, 187, 641–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.425
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, E., Oh, C., Lee, G., & Cho, H. (2014). Safety impacts of intervehicle warning information systems for moving hazards in connected vehicle environments. Transportation Research Record, 2424(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.3141/2424-02
   Google Scholar
• Li, W. (2008). Models of crash likelihood and methods of safety improvement at coordinated signalized intersections [Ph.D. Dissertation]. Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Li, W., & Tarko, A. P. (2011). Effect of arterial signal coordination on safety. Transportation Research Record, 2237(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.3141/2237-06
   Google Scholar
• Macomb Community College Center for Advanced Automotive Technology. (2022). Connected and automated vehicles. http://autocaat.org/Technologies/Automated_and_Connected_Vehicles/
   Google Scholar
• National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2018). Critical reasons for crashes investigated in the national motor vehicle crash causation survey.
   Google Scholar
• National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2020). Overview of motor vehicle crashes in 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Oregon Department of Transportation. (2011). Protocol for VISSIM simulation.
   Google Scholar
• Palm, W. (2005). Introduction to MATLAB 7 for engineers (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Polders, E., Daniels, S., Hermans, E., Brijs, T., & Wets, G. (2015). Crash patterns at signalized intersections. Transportation Research Record, 2514(1), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.3141/2514-12
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, M. S., Abdel-Aty, M., Lee, J., & Rahman, M. H. (2019). Safety benefits of arterials’ crash risk under connected and automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 100, 354–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.01.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, S., & Abdel-Aty, M. (2018). Longitudinal safety evaluation of connected vehicles’ platooning on expressways. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 117, 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.12.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakha, H., Medina, A., Sin, H., Dion, F., Van Aerde, M., & Jenq, J. (2000). Traffic signal coordination across jurisdictional boundaries: Field evaluation of efficiency, energy, environmental, and safety impacts. Transportation Research Record, 1727(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.3141/1727-06
   Google Scholar
• Sinha, A., Chand, S., Wijayaratna, K., Virdi, N., & Dixit, V. (2020). Comprehensive safety assessment in mixed fleets with connected and automated vehicles: A crash severity and rate evaluation of conventional vehicles. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 142, 105567–105515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105567
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Transportation. (2020). How connected vehicles work. https://www.transportation.gov/research-and-technology/how-connected-vehicles-work
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2014). Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks, 1990–2012.
   Google Scholar
• Upadhyay, A. (2020). Haversine formula-calculate geographic distance on earth. https://www.igismap.com/haversine-formula-calculate-geographic-distance-earth/
   Google Scholar
• Utah Department of Transportation. (2018). Traffic analysis guideline.
   Google Scholar
• Utah Department of Transportation. (2022). AADT map. https://uplan.maps.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=cf41e8473956413f906cfc96172fe998
   Google Scholar
• Virginia Department of Transportation Traffic Engineering Division. (2020). VDOT VISSIM User Guide Version 2.0.
   Google Scholar
• Washington State Department of Transportation. (2014). Protocol for VISSIM simulation.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, M., Fries, R., & Mandava, P. (2018). Identifying the safety impat of signal coordination projects along urban arterials using a meta-analysis method. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 6, 61–72. https://doi.org/10.17265/2328-2142/2018.02.002
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (2018). Global status report on road safety. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565684
   Google Scholar
• Xie, K., Wang, X., Huang, H., & Chen, X. (2013). Corridor-level signalized intersection safety analysis in Shanghai, China using Bayesian hierarchical models. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 50, 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2012.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, G., Ahmed, M., & Adomah, E. (2020). An integrated microsimulation approach for safety performance assessment of the Wyoming connected vehicle pilot deployment program. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 146, 105710–105714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105714
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, G., Fan, W., Meng, T., Jiang, X., & Chen, G. (2018). Microscopic evaluation of traffic safety at signal coordinated intersections: A before–after study. Traffic Injury Prevention, 19(8), 867–873. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2018.1525611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, G., Fan, Y., Jiang, X., Fan, W., Meng, T., & Xu, M. (2019). Assessing the impacts of signal coordination on the crash risks of various driving cohorts. Journal of Safety Research, 70, 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2019.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, G., Jiang, X., Fan, Y., Fan, W., & Meng, T. (2020). Examining the factors influencing the injury severity of crashes on arterials with signal coordination. Journal of Transportation Safety & Security, 12(9), 1182–1203. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439962.2019.1580326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar