An ‘appropriate’ test taker: the everyday classroom during the national testing period in school year three in Sweden

References

• Apple, M. 2004. “Creating Difference: Neo-Liberalism, Neo-Conservatism, and the Politics of Educational Reform.” Educational Policy 18 (1): 12–44. doi:10.1177/0895904803260022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Au, W. 2007. “High-Stakes Testing and Curricular Control: A Qualitative Metasynthesis.” Educational Researcher 36 (5): 258–267. doi:10.3102/001389X07306523.
   Google Scholar
• Au, W. 2008. “Devising Inequality: A Bernsteinian Analysis of High-Stakes Testing and Social Reproduction in Education.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 29 (6): 639–651. doi:10.1080/01425690802423312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. 2003. “The Teacher's Soul and the Terrors of Performativity.” Journal of Education Policy 18 (2): 215–228. doi:10.1080/0268093022000043065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beach, D. 2003. “Mathematics Goes to Market.” In Democratic Education: Ethnographic Challenges, edited by D. Beach, T. Gordon, and E. Lahelma, 116–127. London: The Tufnell Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bergh, A. 2011. “Why Quality in Education – And what Quality? A Linguistic Analysis of the Concept of Quality in Swedish Government Texts.” Education Inquiry 2 (4): 709–723. doi:10.3402.
   Google Scholar
• Bergh, A., D. Pettersson, and P. Skott. 2015. “Kunskapsmätningar [Knowledge Assessments].” In Utbildning – makt och politik [Education–Power and Politics], edited by S. Lindblad and L. Lundahl, 163–180. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Billig, M. 1987. Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. Cambridge: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Booher-Jennings, J. 2008. “Learning to Label: Socialisation, Gender, and the Hidden Curriculum of High-Stakes Testing.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 29 (2): 149–160. doi:10.1080/01425690701837513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunar, N. 2008. “The Free Schools ‘Riddle’: Between Traditional Social Democratic, Neo-Liberal and Multicultural Tenets.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 52 (4): 423–438. doi:10.1080/00313830802184608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W. 1987. Gender and Power. Society, the Person and Sexual Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B., and R. Harré. 2001. “Positioning: The Discursive Production of Selves.” In Discourse Theory and Practice. A Reader, edited by M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, and S. J. Yates, 261–271. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Edley, N. 2001. “Analysing Masculinity: Interpretative Repertoires, Ideological Dilemmas and Subject Positions.” In Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis, edited by M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, and S. J. Yates, 189–228. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Edley, N., and M. Wetherell. 1999. “Imagined Futures: Young Men's Talk about Fatherhood and Domestic Life.” British Journal of Social Psychology 38 (2): 181–194. doi:10.1348/014466699164112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwood, J., and P. Murphy. 2002. “Tests, Tiers and Achievement: Gender and Performance at 16 and 14 in England.” European Journal of Education 37 (4): 395–416. doi:10.1111/1467-3435.00118.
   Google Scholar
• Formosinho, J., and S. Barros Araújo. 2006. “Listening to Children as a Way to Reconstruct Knowledge about Children: Some Methodological Implications.” European Early Childhood Education Research Journal 14 (1): 21–31. doi:10.1080/13502930685209781.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1983. “Afterword: the Subject and Power.” In Michel Foucault.Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, edited by L. Dreyfus and P. Rabinow, 208–226. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grek, S. 2009. “Governing by Numbers: The PISA ‘Effect’ in Europe.” Journal of Education Policy 24 (1): 23–37. doi:10.1080/02680930802412669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, K., J. Collins, S. Benjamin, M. Nind, and K. Sheeby. 2004. “SATurated Models of Pupildom: Assessment and Inclusion/Exclusion.” British Educational Research Journal 30 (6): 801–817. doi:10.1080/0141192042000279512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heikkilä, M. 2006. “Kommunikativa resurser för lärande. Barns gester, blickar och tal i tre skolmiljöer” [“Resources in Learning: Children's Communication in Different School Activities”]. PhD diss., Uppsala University.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, C. 2011. “Evaluation: The (Not So) Softly-Softly Approach to Governance and Its Consequences for Compulsory Education in the Nordic Countries.” Education Inquiry 2 (4): 671–687. doi:10.3402/edui.v2i4.22006.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffrey, B., and G. Troman. 2004. “Time for Ethnography.” British Educational Research Journal 30 (4): 535–548. doi:10.1080/0141192042000237220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, R. 2002. “‘That's Very Rude, I Shouldn't Be Telling You that’: Older Women Talking about Sex.” Narrative Inquiry 12 (1): 121–143. doi:10.1075/ni.12.1.18jon.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasanen, K., and H. Räty. 2008. “’Do the Very Best You Can’: The Third-Grade Class Test.” Social Psychology of Education 11 (2): 193–208. doi:10.1007/s11218-007-9045-8.
   Google Scholar
• Kasanen, K., H. Räty, and L. Snellman. 2003. “Learning the Class Test.” European Journal of Psychology of Education 18 (1): 43–58. doi:10.1007/BF03173603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ljung, B.-O. 2000. Standardproven – 53 år i skolans tjänst [Standardised Tests–53 Years in the School Service]. Report from the PRIM-group nr 17. Stockholm: Lärarhögskolan.
   Google Scholar
• Lundahl, L. 2002. “Sweden: Decentralization, Deregulation, Quasi-Markets – And Then What?” Journal of Education Policy 17 (6): 687–697. doi:10.1080/0268093022000032328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunneblad, J., and M. Asplund Carlsson. 2012. “Performativity as Pretence: A Study of Testing Practices in a Compulsory School in Sweden.” Ethnography and Education 7 (3): 297–309. doi:10.1080/17457823.2012.717198.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, A. 2007. “Using Video-Stimulated Recall to Understand Young Children's Perceptions of Learning in Classroom Settings.” European Early Childhood Education Research Journal 15 (2): 213–226. doi:10.1080/13502930701320933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putwain, D. W., L. Connors, K. Woods, and L. J. Nicholson. 2012. “Stress and Anxiety Surrounding Forthcoming Standard Assessment Tests in English Schoolchildren.” Pastoral Care in Education 30 (4): 289–302. doi:10.1080/02643944.2012.688063.
   Google Scholar
• Reay, D., and D. Wiliam. 1999. “‘I'll be Nothing’: Structure, Agency and the Construction of Identity through Assessment.” British Educational Research Journal 25 (3): 343–354. doi:10.1080/0141192990250305.
   Google Scholar
• Rönnberg, L. 2014. “Justifying the Need for Control: Motives for Swedish National School Inspection during Two Governments.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 58 (4): 385–399. doi:10.1080/00313831.2012.732605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silfver, E., G. Sjöberg, and A. Bagger. 2013. “Changing Our Methods and Disrupting the Power Dynamics: National Tests in Third-Grade Classrooms.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 12: 39–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöberg, G., E. Silfver, and A. Bagger. 2015. “Disciplined by Tests.” NOMAD 20 (1): 55–75.
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket [SwedishNationalAgencyforEducation]. 2010. http://www.skolverket.se/bedomning/nationella-prov/bedomning-av-nationella-prov.
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. 2011. Curriculum for the Compulsory School, Preschool Class and the Recreation Centre 2011. Stockholm: Skolverket. http://www.skolverket.se/publikationer?id=2687.
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. 2012. http://www.skolverket.se/om-skolverket/in_english.
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. 2014. A Presentation about the Swedish Education System. Stockholm: Skolverket. http://www.skolverket.se/om-skolverket/andra-sprak-och-lattlast/in-english.
   Google Scholar
• Sunnari, V. 2003. “Training Women for the Role of ‘Responsible Other’ in Primary Teacher Education in Finland 1.” European Journal of Teacher Education 26 (2): 217–227. doi:10.1080/0261976032000088747.
   Google Scholar
• Sveriges Radio. 2015. http://sverigesradio.se/sida/avsnitt?programid=412 [2015-02-10].
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. 2001. “Locating and Conducting Discourse Analytical Research.” In Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis, edited by M. Wetherell, S. Taylor and S. J. Yates, 5–48. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Utbildningsdepartementet [Ministry of Education]. 2008. Fler nationella prov i vår [More National Tests this Spring]. Press release, 30 October 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Walkerdine, V. 1998. Counting Girls Out. Girls and Mathematics. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M., and J. Potter. 1988. “Discourse Analysis and the Identification of Interpretative Repertoires.” In Analysing Everyday Explanation. A Casebook of Methods, edited by C. Antaki, 168–183. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M., S. Taylor, and S. J. Yates. 2001. Discourse Theory and Practice. A Reader. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar