The dialectics of agency in educational ethnography

References

• Ayton, K. 2012. “Differing Pupil Agency in the Face of Adult Positioning.” Ethnography and Education 7 (1): 127–141. doi: 10.1080/17457823.2012.661592
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, B. 2000. Understanding Agency. Social Theory and Responsible Action. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A., and B. M. Montgomery. 1996. Relating: Dialogues and Dialectics. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B. 1990. “Agency as a Form of Discursive Practice. A Classroom Scene Observed.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 11 (3): 341–361. doi: 10.1080/0142569900110306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. 1987. Learning by Expanding. An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. 1996. “Development as Breaking Away and Opening Up: A Challenge to Vygotsky and Piaget.” Swiss Journal of Psychology 55: 126–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., and A. Sannino. 2011. “Discursive Manifestations of Contradictions in Organizational Change Efforts: A Methodological Framework.” Journal of Organizational Change Management 24 (3): 368–387. doi: 10.1108/09534811111132758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferholt, B., and A. P. Rainio. 2016. “Teacher Support of Student Engagement in Early Childhood: Embracing Ambivalence through Playworlds.” Early Years, doi:10.1080/09575146.2016.1141395.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, A. 2012. “Position Exchange: The Social Development of Agency.” New Ideas in Psychology 30 (1): 32–46. doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2010.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakkarainen, P. 2008. “The Challenges and Possibilities of a Narrative Learning Approach in the Finnish Early Childhood Education System.” International Journal of Educational Research 47 (5): 292–300. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2008.12.008
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M., and P. Atkinson. 2007. Ethnography: Principles in Practice. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hegel, G. 1969. Hegel’s Science of Logic. London: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, R. 2008. “Ownership in Learning: A Sociocultural Perspective on Pupil Engagement, Collaboration and Agency in the Classroom.” PhD diss., University of Cambridge, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, R., and A. P. Rainio. 2007. “‘It Doesn't Matter What Part You Play, It Just Matters That You’re There’: Towards Shared Agency in Narrative Play Activity in School.” In Language in Action. Vygotsky and Leontievian Legacy Today, edited by R. Alanen, and S. Pöyhönen, 308–328. Newcastle-upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, D. Jr, W. Lachicotte Jr, D. Skinner, and C. Cain. 1998. Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holzkamp, K. 1991. “Societal and Individual Life Processes.” In Critical Psychology. Contributions to an Historical Science of the Subject, edited by C. W. Tolman, and W. Maiers, 50–64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huf, C. 2013. “Children’s Agency During Transition to Formal Schooling.” Ethnography and Education 8 (1): 61–76. doi: 10.1080/17457823.2013.766434
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. 1803. Über Pädagogik. http://www2.ibw.uni-heidelberg.de/~gerstner/V-Kant_Ueber_Paedagogik.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, N. 2005. Childhood and Human Value. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindqvist, G. 1995. The Aesthetics of Play. A Didactic Study of Play in Preschools. Stockholm: Gotlab.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. 2004. “Self-Regulated Learning, Social Cognitive Theory, and Agency.” Educational Psychologist 39 (2): 135–145. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep3902_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1973. Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy (Rough Draft). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil, L. M. 1986. Contradictions of Control: School Structure and School Knowledge. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, K. 2012. Ethnographic Methods. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Prout, A. 2005. The Future of Childhood. Towards the Interdisciplinary Study of Children. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Rainio, A. P. 2007. “Ghosts, Bodyguards and Fighting Fillies: Manifestations of Pupil Agency in Play Pedagogy.” ACTIO: International Journal for Human Activity Theory 1: 149–170.
   Google Scholar
• Rainio, A. P. 2008. “From Resistance to Involvement: Examining Agency and Control in a Playworld Activity.” Mind, Culture, and Activity 15 (2): 115–140. doi: 10.1080/10749030801970494
   Google Scholar
• Rainio, A. P. 2009. “Horses, Girls, and Agency: Gender in Play Pedagogy.” Outlines: Critical Practice Studies 1: 27–44.
   Google Scholar
• Rainio, A. P. 2010. Lionhearts of the Playworld. An Ethnographic Case Study of the Development of Agency in Play Pedagogy. Studies in Educational Sciences 233. Institute of Behavioural Sciences. University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Rainio, A. P. and J. Hilppö. 2015. “Toimijuuden Dialektiikka Leikkimaailmassa: Kasvatussuhde ja Pedagoginen Paradoksi [Dialectics of agency in Playworld: The Pedagogical Relationship and The Pedagogical Paradox].” In Toimijuus, Ohjaus ja Elämänkulku [Agency, Counselling, and Life Paths], edited by P. Kauppila, J. Silvonen, and M. Vanhalakka-Ruoho, 89–100. Publications of the University of Eastern Finland. Reports and Studies in Education, Humanities and Theology no. 11. Joensuu: University of Eastern Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Rainio, A. P., and A. Marjanovic-Shane. 2013. “From Ambivalence to Agency: Becoming an Author, an Actor and a Hero in a Drama Workshop.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 2 (2): 111–125. doi: 10.1016/j.lcsi.2013.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajala, A., K. Kumpulainen, A. P. Rainio, J. Hilppö, and L. Lipponen. 2016. “Dealing with the Contradiction of Control and Agency During Dialogic Teaching.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2016.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sainsbury, A. M. 1995. Paradoxes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salminen, J. 2012. Koulun pirulliset dilemmat [The Vexing Dilemmas of Schooling]. Helsinki: Teos.
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A. 2000. “Poststructural Feminism in Education: An Overview.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 13 (5): 477–515. doi: 10.1080/09518390050156422
   Google Scholar
• St Pierre, E. A. 2011. “Post Qualitative Research: The Critique and the Coming After.” In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. Denzin, and Y. Lincoln, 611–626. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tolman, C. W. 1981. “The Metaphysic of Relations in Klaus Riegel's ‘Dialectic’ of Human Development.” Human Development 24: 33–51. doi: 10.1159/000272623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolman, C. W. 1994. Psychology, Society, and Subjectivity. An Introduction to German Critical Psychology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in Society. The Development of the Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J., P. Tulviste, and F. Hagstrom. 1996. “A Sociocultural Approach to Agency.” In Contexts for Learning-Sociocultural Dynamics in Children’s Development, edited by E. Forman, N. Minick, and C. Stone, 336–356. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar