Detection of magnetic nanoparticles against proppant and shale reservoir rocks

References

• Nicot JP, Scanlon BR. Water use for shale-gas production in Texas. US Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46:3580–3586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory KB, Vidic RD, Dzombak DA. Water management challenges associated with the production of shale gas by hydraulic fracturing. Elements. 2011;7:181–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dammel JA, Bielicki JM, Pollak MF, Wilson EJ. A tale of two technologies: hydraulic fracturing and geologic carbon sequestration. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45:5075–5076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warlick D. Gas shale and CBM development in North America. Oil Gas Finance J. 2006;3:1.
   Google Scholar
• Sahimi M. Flow and transport in porous media and fractured rock: from classical methods to modern approaches second, revised, and enlarged edition. Weinheim (Germany): Wiley-VCH; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen PD, inventor, Fulton DD, inventor; Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., assignee. Electroconductive proppant compositions and related methods. US patent 7,073,581. 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang CC, Wang L, Lu W, Ruan G, Kini GC, Xiang C, Samuel ELG, Shi W, Kan AT, Wong MS, Tomson MB, Tour JM. Highly stable carbon nanoparticles designed for downhole hydrocarbon detection. Energy Environ Sci. 2012;5:8304–8309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel RR, inventor, McCarthy SM, inventor, Smith M, inventor; Momentive Specialty Chemicals, Inc., assignee. Methods and compositions for determination of fracture geometry in subterranean formations. US patent 8,129,318. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Maguire-Boyle SJ, Garner DJ, Heimann JE, Gao L, Orbaek AW, Barron AR. Automated method for determining the flow of surface functionalized nanoparticles through a hydraulically fractured mineral formation using plasmonic silver nanoparticles. Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2014;16:220–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron AR, Tour JM, Busnaina AA, Jung YJ, Somu S, Kanj MY, Potter DK, Resasco D, Ullo J. Big things in small packages. Oilfield Rev. 2010;3:38–49.
   Google Scholar
• Babes L, Denizot B, Tanguy G, Le Jeune JJ, Jallet P. Synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles used as MRI contrast agents: a parametric study. J Colloid Interface Sci. 1999;212:474–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun C, Lee JSH, Zhang M. Magnetic nanoparticles in MR imaging and drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008;60:1252–1265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H, Lee E, Kim DK, Jang NK, Jeong YY, Jon S. Antibiofouling polymer-coated superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles as potential magnetic resonance contrast agents for in vivo cancer imaging. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:7383–7389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiefenauer LX, Tschirky A, Kühne G, Andres RY. In vivo evaluation of magnetite nanoparticles for use as a tumor contrast agent in MRI. Magn Reson Imaging. 1996;14:391–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roca AG, Veintemillas-Verdaguer S, Port M, Robic C, Serna CJ, Morales MP. Effect of nanoparticle and aggregate size on the relaxometric properties of MR contrast agents based on high quality magnetite nanoparticles. J Phys Chem B. 2009;113:7033–7039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain TK, Reddy MK, Morales MA, Leslie-Pelecky DL, Labhasetwar V. Biodistribution, clearance, and biocompatibility of iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles in rats. Mol Pharm. 2008;5:316–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hrouda F. Magnetic anisotropy of rocks and its applications in geology and geophysics. Surv Geophys. 1982;5:37–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cogné JP. TRM deviations in anisotropic assemblages of multidomain magnetite. Geophys J R Astr Soc. 1987;91:1013–1023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson A, Sadikun S, Potter DK. A theoretical and experimental comparison of the anisotropies of magnetic susceptibility and remanence in rocks and minerals. Geophys J R Astr Soc. 1986;84:185–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter DK, Stephenson A. Single-domain particles in rocks and magnetic fabric analysis. Geophys Res Lett. 1988;15:1097–1100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter DK. Magnetic susceptibility as a rapid non-destructive technique for improved petrophysical parameter prediction. Petrophysics. 2007;48:191–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali A, Potter DK. Temperature dependence of the magnetic properties of reservoir rocks and minerals and implications for in situ borehole predictions of petrophysical parameters. Geophysics. 2012;77:WA211–WA221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun S, Zeng H, Robinson DB, Raoux S, Rice PM, Wang SX, Li G. Monodisperse MFe2O4 (M = Fe, Co, Mn) nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:273–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun S, Zeng H. Size-controlled synthesis of magnetite nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124:8204–8205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wadell H. Volume, shape, and roundness of quartz particles. J Geol. 1935;43:250–280.
   Google Scholar
• Rahm BG, Riha SJ. Toward strategic management of shale gas development: regional, collective impacts on water resources. Environ Sci Policy. 2012;17:12–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivakhnenko OP, Potter DK. Magnetic susceptibility of petroleum reservoir fluids. Phys Chem Earth. 2004;29:899–907.
   Google Scholar
• Arulmurugan R, Jeyadevan B, Vaidyanathan G, Sendhilnathan S. Effect of zinc substitution on Co–Zn and Mn–Zn ferrite nanoparticles prepared by co-precipitation. J Magn Magn Mater. 2005;288:470–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar