Touch in Contact Improvisation: proximity/distance under intimate circumstances

References

• Bartley, Colleen. 2019. “To Touch or Not to Touch: Improvising Contact in Turkey. Interview with Defne Erdur.” Contact Quarterly [Online]: 44 (1). https://contactquarterly.com/contact-improvisation/newsletter/#view=to-touch-or-not-to-touch
   Google Scholar
• Bothwell, Robert. 1998. Canada and Québec: One Country, Two Histories. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bouteloup, Mélanie. 2012. “Sous tensions.” In Intense proximité. Une anthologie du proche et du lointain, edited by Okwui Enwezor, 37–51. Paris: Palais de Tokyo.
   Google Scholar
• Brandstetter, Gabriele, Gerko Egert, and Sabine Zubarik. 2013. Touching and Being Touched. Kinesthesia and Empathy in Dance and Movement. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Bull, Cohen, and Cynthia Jean. 1997. “Sense, Meaning and Perception in Three Dance Cultures.” In Meaning in Motion, edited by Jane C. Desmond, 269–288. New York: Duke University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822397281-016.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, Owen, and Kim Sawchuk. 2012. “Research-Creation: Intervention, Analysis and ‘Family Resemblances.’” Canadian Journal of Communication 37 (1): 5–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2012v37n1a2489.
   Google Scholar
• Classen, Constance. 2005. The Book of Touch. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Davida, Dena. 1997 (June 10). “Contact Improvisation; the Politics of Touch in an Age of Sexual Harassment”, Conference with panelists Roger Copeland, Riccardo Morrison and Ann Cooper-Albright, moderated by Elizabeth Zimmer, during the Contact Improvisation 25th Jubilee Birthday Celebration held at Oberlin College, Oberlin, Ohio.
   Google Scholar
• Enwezor, Okwui, ed. 2012. Intense proximité. Une anthologie du proche et du lointain. Paris: Palais de Tokyo.
   Google Scholar
• Farnell, Brenda. 1999. “Moving Bodies, Acting Selves.” Annual Reviews Anthropology 28 (1): 341–373. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2008.00369.x.
   Google Scholar
• Finnegan, Ruth. 2005. “Tactile Communication.” In The Book of Touch, edited by Constance Classen, 18–25. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, James. 1966. The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Boston/Geneva: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, Anthony. 1992. The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, Erving. 1956. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Scotland: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Goodridge, Janet. 2011. “The Body as a Living Archive of Dance/Movement. Autobiographical Reflections.” In Fields in Motion. Ethnography in the Worlds of Dance, edited by Dena Davida, 119–143. Waterloo: Wilfred Laurier University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, Tomie. 2007. Sensational knowledge- embodying culture through Japanese dance. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Edward T. 1963. “A System for the Notation of Proxemic Behavior.” American Anthropologist, New Series 65 (5): 1003–1026. doi:https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1963.65.5.02a00020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, Edward T. 1968. “Proxemics.” Current Anthropology 9 (2/3): 83–108. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5784-2_19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howes, David. 2018. “The Skinscape: Reflections on the Dermalogical Turn.” Body & Society. Special Issue: Skin Matters 24 (1–2): 225–239.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, Michael. 2012. Between One and One Another. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jussilainen, Anna. 2015. “Contact Improvisation as an Art of Relating: The Importance of Touch for Building Positive Interaction.” Journal of Dance & Somatic Practices 7 (1): 113–127. doi:https://doi.org/10.1386/jdsp.7.1.113_1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaltenbrunner, Thomas. 1998. Contact Improvisation: Moving, Dancing, Interaction. Aachen: Meyer.
   Google Scholar
• Keogh, Martin. 2018. Dancing Deeper Still. The Practice of Contact Improvisation. Wroclaw, Poland: Intimately Rooted Books.
   Google Scholar
• Koteen, David, and Stark Smith Nancy. 2008. Caught Falling. The Confluence of Contact Improvisation, Nancy Stark Smith, and Other Moving Ideas. Holyoke (MA): Marcus Printing.
   Google Scholar
• Lafrance, Marc. 2018. “Skin Studies: Past, Present and Future.” Body & Society. Special Issue: Skin Matters 24 (1–2): 3–32.
   Google Scholar
• Lancaster, Roger N. 2011. “Autoethnography. When I Was a Girl (Notes on Contrivance).” In A Companion to the Anthropology of the Body and Embodiment, edited by E. Mascia-Lees Frances, 46–71. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Le Breton, David. 2006. La saveur du monde. Une anthropologie des sens. Paris: Métailié.
   Google Scholar
• Leavy, Patricia. 2009. “Narrative Inquiry.” In Method Meets Art. Arts-Based Research Practice, 25–62. New York/London: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, Erin. 2011. “Intimare.” Etc 94: 25–29.
   Google Scholar
• Marar, Ziyad. 2012. Intimacy. Durham: Acumen.
   Google Scholar
• Nancy, Jean-Luc. 1996. Être singulier pluriel. Paris: Galilée.
   Google Scholar
• Novack, Cynthia. 1990. Sharing the Dance: Contact Improvisation and American Culture. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paxton, Steve. 2003. “Drafting interior techniques”, In Taken by surprise. A dance improvisation reader, edited by Ann Cooper Albright and David Gere, 175–184. Middletown, Connecticut: Wesleyan University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rea, Kathleen. 2017. “The Contact Improv Consent Culture BLog.” Accessed 21 September 2021. https://contactimprovconsentculture.com/2017/12/03/first-blog-post/
   Google Scholar
• Royona, Mitra. 2018. “Talking Politics of Contact Improvisation with Steve Paxton.” Dance Research Journal 50 (3): 6–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0149767718000335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schellow, Constance. 2016. Diskurs-Choreographien: Zur Produktivität des,Nicht‘ für die zeitgenössische Tanzwissenschaft. München: Epodium.
   Google Scholar
• Scheper-Hughes, Nancy, and Margaret. M. Lock. 1987. “The Mindful Body: A Prolegomenon to Future Work in Medical Anthropology.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly, New Series 1 (1): 6–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1525/maq.1987.1.1.02a00020.
   Google Scholar
• Tisseron, Serge. 2001. L’intimité surexposée. Paris: Éditions Ramsay.
   Google Scholar
• Tisseron, Serge. 2011. “Intimité et extimité”, Communications 88: 83–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.3917/commu.088.0083.
   Google Scholar
• Tembeck, Iro. 2009. Danser à Montréal. Germination d’une histoire chorégraphique. Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec.
   Google Scholar
• Yardley, Brooks. 2017. “Respecting Boundaries/Coexisting Genders Women’s Experiences of Feeling Unsafe in Contact Improv.” Accessed 21 September 2021. http://contactimprov.ca/doc/ci_en6_web.pdf
   Google Scholar