The emerging potential of interactive virtual reality in drug discovery

References

• Gund P, Andose JD, Rhodes JB, et al. Three-dimensional molecular modeling and drug design. Science. 1980;208(4451):1425–1431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall GR. Computer-aided drug design. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1987;27(1):193–213.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Drie JH. Computer-aided drug design: the next 20 years. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2007;21(10):591–601.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Macalino SJY, Gosu V, Hong S, et al. Role of computer-aided drug design in modern drug discovery. Arch Pharm Res. 2015;38(9):1686–1701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen WL. The many roles of computation in drug discovery. Science. 2004;303(5665):1813–1818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovering F, Bikker J, Humblet C. Escape from flatland: increasing saturation as an approach to improving clinical success. J Med Chem. 2009;52(21):6752–6756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovering F. Escape from Flatland 2: complexity and promiscuity. Med Chem Comm. 2013;4(3):515–519.
   Google Scholar
• Licklider JC. Man-computer symbiosis. IRE Trans Human Factors Electron. 1960;1:4–11.
   Google Scholar
• Wright WG. Using virtual reality to augment perception, enhance sensorimotor adaptation, and change our minds. Front Syst Neurosci. 2014;8:56.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Biocca F, Delaney B. Immersive virtual reality technology. Communication in the Age of Virtual Reality. 1995;15(32):10–5555.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland IE, editor. A head-mounted three dimensional display. Proceedings of the December 9-11, 1968, Fall Joint Computer Conference, Part I, San Francisco, California; 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger MW, Gionfriddo T, Hinrichsen K, editors. VIDEOPLACE—an artificial reality. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Francisco, California; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Lanier J. Virtual reality: the promise of the future. Interact Learn Int. 1992;8(4):275–279.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher SS, McGreevy M, Humphries J, et al., editors. Virtual environment display system. Proceedings of the 1986 workshop on Interactive 3D graphics, Chapel Hill, North Carolina USA; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Lippman A. Movie-maps: an application of the optical videodisc to computer graphics. Acm Siggraph Comput Graphics. 1980;14(3):32–42.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland I. The ultimate display. 1965
   Google Scholar
• Shakya S. Virtual restoration of damaged archeological artifacts obtained from expeditions using 3D visualization. J Innovative Image Process (JIIP). 2019;1(2):102–110.
   Google Scholar
• Lütjens M, Kersten TP, Dorschel B, et al. Virtual reality in cartography: immersive 3D visualization of the arctic clyde inlet (Canada) using digital elevation models and bathymetric data. Multimodal Technol Inter. 2019;3(1):9.
   Google Scholar
• Li R. Dynamic three-dimensional visualization system of sea area flow field based on virtual reality technology. Ccamlr Sci. 2019;26(1):23–29.
   Google Scholar
• Poyade M, Eaglesham C, Trench J, et al. A transferable psychological evaluation of virtual reality applied to safety training in chemical manufacturing. ACS Chem Health Saf. 2021;28(1):55–65.
   Google Scholar
• Bird JM. The use of virtual reality head-mounted displays within applied sport psychology. J Sport Psychol Action. 2020;11(2):115–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilty DM, Randhawa K, Maheu MM, et al. A review of telepresence, virtual reality, and augmented reality applied to clinical care. J Technol Behav Sci. 2020;5(2):178–205.
   Google Scholar
• Moro C, Štromberga Z, Raikos A, et al. The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2017;10(6):549–559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desselle MR, Brown RA, James AR, et al. Augmented and virtual reality in surgery. Comput Sci Eng. 2020;22(3):18–26.
   Google Scholar
• Calvelo M, Á P, Garcia-Fandino R. An immersive journey to the molecular structure of SARS-CoV-2: virtual reality in COVID-19. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2020;18:2621–2628
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tse C-M, Li H, Leung K-S , et al., editors. Interactive drug design in virtual reality. 15th International Conference on Information Visualisation, London, UK; 2011: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Zonta N, Brancale A. Virtual reality applications in antiviral drug design. Antiviral Res. 2009;82(2):A74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinberg ML, Wanke LA. New approaches and technologies in drug design and discovery. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1995;52(12):1323–1336.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cassidy KC, Šefčík J, Raghav Y, et al., ProteinVR: web-based molecular visualization in virtual reality. PLoS Comput Biol. 2020;16(3): e1007747
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kingsley LJ, Brunet V, Lelais G, et al. Development of a virtual reality platform for effective communication of structural data in drug discovery. J Mol Graphics Modell. 2019;89:234–241
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor MB, Bennie SJ, Deeks HM, et al., Interactive molecular dynamics in virtual reality from quantum chemistry to drug binding: an open-source multi-person framework. J Chem Phys. 2019;150(22): 220901
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paper VR: VR storm studio; 2021 [2021 18 October]. Available from: https://vrstorm.hu/en/paper-vr/
   Google Scholar
• Samsung gear VR: samsung; 2021 [2021 18 October]. Available from: https://www.samsung.com/global/galaxy/gear-vr/
   Google Scholar
• Google cardboard: google; 2021 [18/January/2021]. Available from: https://arvr.google.com/cardboard/
   Google Scholar
• Cruz-Neira C, Sandin DJ, DeFanti TA, et al. The CAVE: audio visual experience automatic virtual environment. Commun ACM. 1992;35(6):64–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Origin by vicon: vicon; [31/January/2022]. Available from: https://www.vicon.com/applications/location-based-virtual-reality
   Google Scholar
• Liu X-H, Wang T, Lin J-P, et al. Using virtual reality for drug discovery: a promising new outlet for novel leads. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2018;13(12):1103–1114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaudiosi J. Dassault Systèmes Uses HTC vive to replace cave virtual reality tech. Fortune. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Arcane. Immersive projection-based virtual reality (VR) for everyone, mobile and tailor-made 2022 [31/January/2022]. Available from: https://arcanetech.io/produit/vr-cave/
   Google Scholar
• Mestre DR. CAVE versus head-mounted displays: ongoing thoughts. Electron Imaging. 2017;2017(3):31–35.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson A. Oculus rift S review: a swan song for first-generation VR: The Verge; 2019 2022 January 31. Available from: https://www.theverge.com/2019/4/30/18523941/oculus-rift-s-review-vr-headset-price-specs-features
   Google Scholar
• Valve. Valve Index VR Kit Steam2022 [31/January/2022]. Available from: https://store.steampowered.com/sub/354231
   Google Scholar
• Vive. Vive pro series vive2022 [31/January/2022]. Available from: https://www.vive.com/uk/product/#pro%20series
   Google Scholar
• Angelov V, Petkov E, Shipkovenski G, et al., editors. Modern virtual reality headsets. 2020 international congress on human-computer interaction, Optimization and Robotic Applications (HORA). 2020: IEEE
   Google Scholar
• Mehrfard A, Fotouhi J, Taylor G, et al. A comparative analysis of virtual reality head-mounted display systems. arXiv preprint arXiv. 2019;191202913.
   Google Scholar
• HTC Vive Pro: Vive; 2021 [2021 13 September]. Available from: https://www.vive.com/uk/product/
   Google Scholar
• Valve Index: Valve Software; 2021 [2021 13 September]. Available from: https://www.valvesoftware.com/en/index
   Google Scholar
• Oculus Quest 2: Oculus VR; 2021 2021 September 13. Available from: https://www.oculus.com/quest-2/
   Google Scholar
• Introducing meta: a social technology company: meta; 2021 [2021 December 11]. Available from: https://about.fb.com/news/2021/10/facebook-company-is-now-meta/
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson N. Snow crash. United States: Bantam Books; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor M, Deeks HM, Dawn E, et al., Sampling molecular conformations and dynamics in a multiuser virtual reality framework. Sci Adv. 2018;4(6): eaat2731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hušák M, editor The use of stereoscopic visualization in chemistry and structural biology. Stereoscopic displays and virtual reality systems XIII. International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu X, Li H, Huang L, et al. 3D printing promotes the development of drugs. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;131:110644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire R, Glowacki BR, Williams RR, et al. Omg-vr: open-source mudra gloves for manipulating molecular simulations in vr. arXiv preprint arXiv. 2019;190103532.
   Google Scholar
• Norrby M, Grebner C, Eriksson J, et al., Molecular rift: virtual reality for drug designers. J Chem Inf Model. 2015;55(11): 2475–2484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Microsoft kinect: microsoft; 2021 [ 29/10/21]. Available from: https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/kinect/
   Google Scholar
• Stone RJ, editor Haptic feedback: a brief history from telepresence to virtual reality. International Workshop on Haptic Human-Computer Interaction, Glasgow, UK. Springer; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Burdea GC Force and touch feedback for virtual reality. 1996
   Google Scholar
• Chinello F, Malvezzi M, Prattichizzo D, et al. A modular wearable finger interface for cutaneous and kinesthetic interaction: control and evaluation. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2019;67(1):706–716.
   Google Scholar
• Whitmire E, Benko H, Holz C, et al., editors. Haptic revolver: touch, shear, texture, and shape rendering on a reconfigurable virtual reality controller. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal, QC, Canada; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Al Maimani A, Roudaut A, editors. Frozen suit: designing a changeable stiffness suit and its application to haptic games. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Denver, Colorado, USA; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Sada M, Jiang K, Ranade S, et al. HapticSnakes: multi-haptic feedback wearable robots for immersive virtual reality. Virtual Reality. 2020;24(2):191–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spagnoletti G, Meli L, Baldi TL, et al., editors. Rendering of pressure and textures using wearable haptics in immersive vr environments. 2018 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR), Reutlingen, Germany; 2018: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Pacchierotti C, Sinclair S, Solazzi M, et al. Wearable haptic systems for the fingertip and the hand: taxonomy, review, and perspectives. IEEE Trans Haptics. 2017;10(4):580–600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HaptX Gloves DK2: haptX Inc.; 2021 [ 29/10/21]. Available from: https://haptx.com/virtual-reality/
   Google Scholar
• Kreimeier J, Hammer S, Friedmann D, et al., editors. Evaluation of different types of haptic feedback influencing the task-based presence and performance in virtual reality. Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments, Rhodes, Greece; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Alaker M, Wynn GR, Arulampalam T. Virtual reality training in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review & meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2016;29:85–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan N, Dubey VN, Wainwright TW, et al. A review of virtual reality based training simulators for orthopaedic surgery. Med Eng Phys. 2016;38(2):59–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pusch A, Lécuyer A, editors. Pseudo-haptics: from the theoretical foundations to practical system design guidelines. Proceedings of the 13th international conference on multimodal interfaces, New York, USA; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Lécuyer A, Coquillart S, Kheddar A, et al., editors. Pseudo-haptic feedback: can isometric input devices simulate force feedback? Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality 2000 (Cat. No. 00CB37048), New Jersey, USA; 2000: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Lécuyer A. Simulating haptic feedback using vision: a survey of research and applications of pseudo-haptic feedback. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments. 2009;18(1):39–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roebuck Williams R, Varcoe X, Glowacki BR, et al., editors. Subtle sensing: detecting differences in the flexibility of virtually simulated molecular objects. Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Hawaii, USA; 2020
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph. 1996;14(1):33–38.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trott O, Olson AJ. AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J Comput Chem. 2010;31(2):455–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karplus M, Kuriyan J. Molecular dynamics and protein function. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2005;102(19):6679–6685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández-Rodríguez M, C Rosales-Hernández M, E Mendieta-Wejebe J, et al. Current tools and methods in molecular dynamics (MD) simulations for drug design. Curr Med Chem. 2016;23(34):3909–3924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durrant JD, McCammon JA. Molecular dynamics simulations and drug discovery. BMC Biol. 2011;9(1):1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Shi D, Zhou S, et al. Molecular dynamics simulations and novel drug discovery. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2018;13(1):23–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vivo M, Masetti M, Bottegoni G, et al. Role of molecular dynamics and related methods in drug discovery. J Med Chem. 2016;59(9):4035–4061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLano WL. Pymol: an open-source molecular graphics tool. CCP4 Newsletter on Protein Crystallography. 2002;40(1):82–92.
   Google Scholar
• Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, et al. UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem. 2004;25(13):1605–1612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddard TD, Huang CC, Meng EC, et al., UCSF ChimeraX: meeting modern challenges in visualization and analysis. Protein Sci. 2018;27(1): 14–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, et al. UCSF ChimeraX: structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci. 2021;30(1):70–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radić Z, Kirchhoff PD, Quinn DM, et al. Electrostatic influence on the kinetics of ligand binding to acetylcholinesterase: distinctions between active center ligands and fasciculin. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(37):23265–23277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou H-X, Pang X. Electrostatic interactions in protein structure, folding, binding, and condensation. Chem Rev. 2018;118(4):1691–1741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Náray‐szabó G. Electrostatics in computer‐aided drug design. Int J Quantum Chem. 1989;36(S16):87–99.
   Google Scholar
• Rathi PC, Ludlow RF, Verdonk ML. Practical high-quality electrostatic potential surfaces for drug discovery using a graph-convolutional deep neural network. J Med Chem. 2019;63(16):8778–8790.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doak DG, Denyer GS, Gerrard JA, et al., Peppy: a virtual reality environment for exploring the principles of polypeptide structure. Protein Sci. 2020;29(1): 157–168.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kneller DW, Li H, Galanie S, et al., Structural, electronic, and electrostatic determinants for inhibitor binding to subsites s1 and s2 in sars-Cov-2 main protease. J Med Chem. 2021;64(23): 17366–17383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collaborating for coronavirus drug discovery California: oculus; cited 2022 Apr 13]. Available from 2022 Apr 13: https://business.oculus.com/case-studies/novartis/?locale=en_GB
   Google Scholar
• Accelerating drug discovery to create a healthier future California: Oculus; cited 2022 Apr 13]. Available from 2022 Apr 13: https://business.oculus.com/case-studies/nimbus/?locale=en_GB
   Google Scholar
• Roivant in largest ever deployment of Nanome VR drug discovery software London UK: VRWorldTech; cited 2022 Apr 13]. Available from 2022 Apr 13: https://vrworldtech.com/2021/12/17/roivant-in-largest-ever-deployment-of-nanome-vr-drug-discovery-software/
   Google Scholar
• Castellanos S. Virtual reality puts drug researchers inside the molecules they study. Wall Street Journal. Sep 7. 2021. [cited 25 05 2022]. https://www.wsj.com/articles/virtual-reality-puts-drug-researchers-inside-the-molecules-they-study-11631023212
   Google Scholar
• Grier F Nanome partners with Fujitsu, San Diego: San Diego Business Journal 2020 cited 2022 Apr 13]. Available from 2022 Apr 13: https://www.sdbj.com/news/2020/sep/15/nanome-partners-fujitsu/
   Google Scholar
• Fried SD, Boxer SG. Electric fields and enzyme catalysis. Annu Rev Biochem. 2017;86:387–415.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weiner PK, Langridge R, Blaney JM, et al. Electrostatic potential molecular surfaces. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 1982;79(12):3754–3758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer MR, Mackey MD. Electrostatic complementarity as a fast and effective tool to optimize binding and selectivity of protein–ligand complexes. J Med Chem. 2019;62(6):3036–3050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura H, Komatsu K, Nakagawa S, et al. Visualization of electrostatic recognition by enzymes for their ligands and cofactors. J Mol Graph. 1985;3(1):2–11.
   Google Scholar
• Keil M, Marhofer RJ, Rohwer A, et al. Molecular visualization in the rational drug design process. Front Biosci. 2009;14:2559–2583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurrus E, Engel D, Star K, et al. Improvements to the APBS biomolecular solvation software suite. Protein Sci. 2018;27(1):112–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unni S, Huang Y, Hanson RM, et al. Web servers and services for electrostatics calculations with APBS and PDB2PQR. J Comput Chem. 2011;32(7):1488–1491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolinsky TJ, Nielsen JE, McCammon JA, et al. PDB2PQR: an automated pipeline for the setup of Poisson–Boltzmann electrostatics calculations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(suppl_2):W665–W667.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laureanti J, Brandi J, Offor E, et al., Visualizing biomolecular electrostatics in virtual reality with unitymol‐APBS. Protein Sci. 2020;29(1): 237–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loging WT. The art and science of the drug discovery pipeline: history of drug discovery. Bioinformatics and Computational Biology in Drug Discovery and Development. 2016;1.
   Google Scholar
• Chang Y-S, Chou C-H, Chuang M-J, et al. Effects of virtual reality on creative design performance and creative experiential learning. Interact Learn Environ. 2020; 28:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Yang X, Lin L, Cheng P-Y, et al. Examining creativity through a virtual reality support system. Edu Technol Res Develop. 2018;66(5):1231–1254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg JM, Tymoczko JL, Stryer L. Biochemistry. New York: WH Freeman; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Pagadala NS, Syed K, Tuszynski J. Software for molecular docking: a review. Biophys Rev. 2017;9(2):91–102.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kutak D, Selzer MN, Byska J, et al. Vivern A virtual environment for multiscale visualization and modeling of DNA nanostructures. 2021. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9523759
   Google Scholar
• Juárez-Jiménez J, Tew P, Llabres S, et al. A virtual reality ensemble molecular dynamics workflow to study complex conformational changes in proteins. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Stone JE, Gullingsrud J, Schulten K, editors. A system for interactive molecular dynamics simulation. Proceedings of the 2001 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics, New York, USA; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Rapaport D. Interactive molecular dynamics. Phys A Stat Mech Appli. 1997;240(1–2):246–254.
   Google Scholar
• Vormoor O. Quick and easy interactive molecular dynamics using Java3D. Computing Sci Eng. 2001;3(5):98–104.
   Google Scholar
• Knoll P, Mirzaei S. Development of an interactive molecular dynamics simulation software package. Rev Sci Instrum. 2003;74(4):2483–2487.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder DV. Interactive molecular dynamics. Am J Phys. 2015;83(3):210–218.
   Google Scholar
• Croll TI, Andersen GR. Re-evaluation of low-resolution crystal structures via interactive molecular-dynamics flexible fitting (iMDFF): a case study in complement C4. Acta Crystallograph Sect D: Struct Biol. 2016;72(9):1006–1016.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Izrailev S, Stepaniants S, Isralewitz B, et al. Steered molecular dynamics. Computational molecular dynamics: challenges, methods, ideas. Springer; 1999. p. 39–65.
   Google Scholar
• Grayson P, Tajkhorshid E, Schulten K. Mechanisms of selectivity in channels and enzymes studied with interactive molecular dynamics. Biophys J. 2003;85(1):36–48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ai Z, Fröhlich T, editors Molecular dynamics simulation in virtual environments. Computer graphics forum. Wiley Online Library; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Hamdi M, Ferreira A, Sharma G, et al. Prototyping bio-nanorobots using molecular dynamics simulation and virtual reality. Microelectronics J. 2008;39(2):190–201.
   Google Scholar
• Dreher M, Piuzzi M, Turki A, et al. Interactive molecular dynamics: scaling up to large systems. Procedia Comput Sci. 2013;18:20–29.
   Google Scholar
• Seritan S, Wang Y, Ford JE, et al., InteraChem: virtual reality visualizer for reactive interactive molecular dynamics. J Chem Educ. 2021;98(11): 3486–3492.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrell JB, Campbell JP, McCarthy DR, et al. Chemical exploration with virtual reality in organic teaching laboratories. J Chem Educ. 2019;96(9):1961–1966.
   Google Scholar
• Luehr N, Jin AG, Martínez TJ. Ab initio interactive molecular dynamics on graphical processing units (GPUs). J Chem Theory Comput. 2015;11(10):4536–4544.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Phillips JC, Braun R, Wang W, et al. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J Comput Chem. 2005;26(16):1781–1802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson-Binnie AD, O’Connor MB, Barnoud J, et al. Narupa iMD: a VR-enabled multiplayer framework for streaming interactive molecular simulations. ACM SIGGRAPH 2020 Immersive Pavilion. 2020;1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Eastman P, Swails J, Chodera JD, et al. OpenMM 7: rapid development of high performance algorithms for molecular dynamics. PLoS Comput Biol. 2017;13(7):e1005659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennie SJ, Ranaghan KE, Deeks H, et al., Teaching enzyme catalysis using interactive molecular dynamics in virtual reality. J Chem Educ. 2019;96(11): 2488–2496.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider G, Böhm H-J. Virtual screening and fast automated docking methods. Drug Discov Today. 2002;7:64–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodsell DS, Morris GM, Olson AJ. Automated docking of flexible ligands: applications of autodock. J Mol Recog. 1996;9(1):1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaney JM, Dixon JS. A good ligand is hard to find: automated docking methods. Perspect Drug Discovery Des. 1993;1(2):301–319.
   Google Scholar
• Goodsell DS, Olson AJ. Automated docking of substrates to proteins by simulated annealing. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinf. 1990;8(3):195–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deeks HM, Walters RK, Hare SR, et al., Interactive molecular dynamics in virtual reality for accurate flexible protein-ligand docking. Plos one. 2020;15(3): e0228461.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deeks HM, Walters RK, Barnoud J, et al., Interactive molecular dynamics in virtual reality is an effective tool for flexible substrate and inhibitor docking to the SARS-CoV-2 main protease. J Chem Inf Model. 2020;60(12): 5803–5814.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang L, Lin D, Sun X, et al. Crystal structure of SARS-CoV-2 main protease provides a basis for design of improved α-ketoamide inhibitors. Science. 2020;368(6489):409–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan HH, Moesser MA, Walters RK, et al. Discovery of SARS-Cov-2 mpro peptide inhibitors from modelling substrate and ligand binding. Chemical science. 2021;12.
   Google Scholar
• Discovery C4X. The 4Sight project: using VR in the drug discovery space: immerse UK; [31/January/2022]. Available from: https://www.immerseuk.org/case-study/c4x-discovery/
   Google Scholar
• Dutton GDail. DEMO: Nanome Triggers Deep Drug Development Insights Via Virtual Molecule Design. BioSpace. 2021. [cited 2022 May 25]. https://www.biospace.com/article/demo-nanome-inc-triggers-deep-drug-development-insights-via-virtual-molecule-design-/
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell TJ, Jones AJ, O’Connor MB, et al., editors. Towards molecular musical instruments: interactive sonifications of 17-alanine, graphene and carbon nanotubes. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Audio Mostly, New York, USA; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Arbon RE, Jones AJ, Bratholm LA, et al. Sonifying stochastic walks on biomolecular energy landscapes. arXiv preprint arXiv. 2018;180305805.
   Google Scholar
• Shannon RJ, Deeks HM, Burfoot E, et al. Exploring human-guided strategies for reaction network exploration: interactive molecular dynamics in virtual reality as a tool for citizen scientists. J Chem Phys. 2021;155(15):154106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar