Disciplinarity and sport science in Europe: A statistical and sociological study of ECSS conference abstracts

References

• Agresti, A. (2007). An introduction to categorical data analysis (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Apostel, L. (1972). Conceptual tools for interdisciplinarity: An operational approach. In L. Apostel, G. Berger, A. Briggs, & G. Michaud (Eds.), Interdisciplinarity: Problems of teaching and research in universities (pp. 141–180). Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Aram, J. D. (2004). Concepts of interdisciplinarity: Configurations of knowledge and action. Human Relations, 57(4), 379–412. doi:10.1177/0018726704043893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, A., Born, B., & Weszkalnys, G. (2008). Logics of interdisciplinarity. Economy and Society, 37(1), 20–49. doi:10.1080/03085140701760841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines. Milton Keynes: Society for Research onto Higher Education and Open Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-David, J., & Collins, R. (1966). Social factors in the origins of a new science: The case of psychology. American Sociological Review, 31(4), 451–465. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2090769 doi: 10.2307/2090769
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1975). The specificity of the scientific field and the social condition of the progress of reason. Social Science Information, 14(6), 19–47. doi:10.1177/053901847501400602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo academicus. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (2004). Science of science and reflexivity. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, D. G. (1999). The challenges of interdisciplinarity. Policy Sciences, 32, 327–337. doi:10.1023/A:1004706019826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, J. R., & Zuckerman, H. (1975). The emergence of a scientific specialty: The self-exemplifying case of the sociology of science. In L. Coser (Ed.), The idea of social structure: Papers in honor of Robert K. Merton (pp. 139–174). New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, S. (1994). Why sociology doesn’t make progress like the natural sciences. Sociological Forum, 9, 133–154. doi:10.1007/BF01476359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collinet, C., Terral, P., Trabal, P., & Delalandre, M. (2013). Forms and modes of apprehending interdisciplinarity: A socio-computer analysis of sports sciences. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology, 119, 61–78. doi:10.1177/0759106313486401
   Google Scholar
• Cook, R. D., & Weisberg, S. (1982). Residuals and influence in regression. London: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, M. A., & Cox, T. F. (2001). Multidimensional scaling. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Dogan, M. (1996). The hybridization of social science knowledge. Library Trends, 44(2), 296–315.
   Google Scholar
• Fanelli, D., & Glänzel, W. (2013). Bibliometric evidence for a hierarchy of the sciences. PLoS ONE, 8(6), e66938. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066938
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gingras, Y. (1991). L’institutionnalisation de la recherche en milieu universitaire et ses effets. Sociologie et Sociétés, 23(1), 41–54. doi:10.7202/001297ar
   Google Scholar
• Haag, H. (1979). Development and structure of a theoretical framework for sport science (“Sportwissenschaft”). Quest, 31(1), 25–35. doi:10.1080/00336297.1979.10519919
   Google Scholar
• Janda, L. H., England, K., Lovejoy, D., & Drury, K. (1998). Attitudes toward psychology relative to other disciplines. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 29(2), 140–143. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.29.2.140 doi: 10.1037/0735-7028.29.2.140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, J. (2010). A taxonomy of interdisciplinarity. In J. T. Klein & C. Mitcham (Eds.), The oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (pp. 15–30). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, J. T. (1996). Interdisciplinary needs: The current context. Library Trends, 45(2), 134–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, H. A., & Monford, W. R. (1979). The crossdisciplinary structure of kinesiology and sports studies: Distinctions, implications and advantages. Quest, 31(2), 222–230. doi:10.1080/00336297.1979.10519939
   Google Scholar
• Mullins, N. C. (1972). The development of a scientific speciality: The phage group and the origins of molecular biology. Minerva, 10(1), 51–82. doi:10.1007/BF01881390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nevell, K. M. (1990). Physical education in higher education: Chaos out of order. Quest, 42(3), 227–242. doi:10.1080/00336297.1990.10483997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissani, M. (1997). Ten cheers for interdisciplinarity: The case for interdisciplinary knowledge and research. The Social Science Journal, 34(2), 201–216. doi:10.1016/S0362-3319(97)90051-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (1972). Interdisciplinarity: Problems of teaching and research in universities. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Peretti-Watel, P. (2013). L’homo medicus, cible idéale, mais introuvable, des campagnes de prévention. Actualité et Dossier en Santé Publique, 83, 29–31. Retrieved from http://www.hcsp.fr/explore.cgi/Adsp?clef=133
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Renson, R. (1989). From physical education to kinanthropology: A quest for academic and professional identity. Quest, 41, 235–256. doi:10.1080/00336297.1989.10483973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renson, R. (1991). Homo Movens: In search of paradigms for the study of humans in movement. In R. J. Park & H. M. Eckert (Eds.), New possibilities, new paradigms? (pp. 100–114). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics for the American Academy of Physical Education.
   Google Scholar
• Romm, N. (1998). Interdisciplinarity practice as reflexivity. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 11(1), 63–77. doi:10.1023/A:1022964905762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinn, T. (2002). The triple helix and new production of knowledge: Prepackaged thinking on science and technology. Social Studies of Science, 32(4), 599–614. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3183088 doi: 10.1177/030631202128967271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmonot, P. (1988). Homo sportivus. Sport, capitalisme et religion. Paris: Au vif du sujet, Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (2004). Psychology’s status as a scientific discipline: Its empirical placement within an implicit hierarchy of the sciences. Review of General Psychology, 8(1), 59–67. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.8.1.59 doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.8.1.59
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (2004). What is exercise science? Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 3(2), 5–14. doi: 10.3794/johlste.32.74
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. (1989). Institutional ecology, “translations”, and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals on Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420. doi:10.1177/030631289019003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stavrou, S. (2009). Negotiating curriculum change in the French university: The case of “regionalising” social scientific knowledge. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 19(1), 19–36. doi:10.1080/09620210903057624
   Google Scholar
• Stichweh, R. (1992). The sociology of scientific disciplines: On the genesis and stability of the disciplinary structure of modern science. Science in Context, 5(1), 3–15. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0269889700001071 doi: 10.1017/S0269889700001071
   Google Scholar
• Storer, N. W. (1967). The hard sciences and the soft: Some sociological observations. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 55(1), 75–84. PMCID: PMC198502
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weingart, P. (2000). Interdisciplinarity: The paradoxical discourse. In P. Weingar & N. Stehr (Eds.), Practising interdisciplinarity (pp. 13–20). Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar