References
- Akcinaroglu, S. (2012). Rebel interdependencies and civil war outcomes. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 56(5), 879–903.
- Asal, V., Brown, M., & Dalton, A. (2012). Why split? Organizational splits among ethnopolitical organizations in the Middle East. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 56(1), 94–117.
- Baines, E. (2014). Forced marriage as a political project: Sexual rules and relations in the lord’s resistance army. Journal of Peace Research, 51(3), 405–417.
- Bueno de Mesquita, E. (2008). Terrorist factions. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 3(4), 399–418.
- Christia, F. (2012). Alliance formation in civil wars. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Cohen, D. (2013). Explaining rape during civil war: Cross-national evidence 1908-2009. American Political Science Review, 107(3), 461–477.
- Connell, D. (2001). Inside the EPLF: The origins of the people’s party’ & its role in the liberation of Eritrea. Review of African Political Economy, 28(89), 345–364.
- Cunningham, D. (2006). Veto players and civil war duration. American Journal of Political Science, 50(4), 875–892.
- Cunningham, D., Gleditsch, K. S., & Salehyan, I. (2009). It takes two. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53(4), 570–597.
- Cunningham, D., Gleditsch, K. S., & Salehyan, I. (2013). Non-state actors in civil wars: A new dataset. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 30(5), 516–531.
- Cunningham, K. G. (2011). Divide and conquer or divide and concede: How do states respond to internally divided separatists? American Political Science Review, 105(2), 275–297. doi:10.1017/S0003055411000013
- Cunningham, K. G., Bakke, K. M., & Seymour, L. (2012). Shirts today, skins tomorrow: Dual contests and the effects of fragmentation in self determination disputes. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 56(1), 67–93.
- Debos, M. (2016). Living by the gun in chad: Combatants, impunity and state formation. London, UK: Zed Books.
- Fjelde, H., & Nilsson, D. (2012). Rebels against rebels: Explaining violence between rebel groups. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 56(4), 604–628.
- Fjelde, H., & Nilsson, D. (2018). The rise of rebel contenders: Barriers to entry and fragmentation in civil wars. Journal of Peace Research, 55(5), 551–565.
- Gleditsch, N. P., Wallensteen, P., Eriksson, M., Sollenberg, M., & Strand, H. (2002). Armed conflict 1946-2001: A new dataset. Journal of Peace Research, 39(5), 615–637.
- Humphreys, M., & Weinstein, J. (2008). Who fights? The determinants of participation in civil war. American Journal of Political Science, 52(2), 436–455.
- Jann, B. (2014). Plotting regression coefficients and other estimates. Stata Journal, 14(4), 708–737.
- Kalyvas, S. (2008). Ethnic defection in civil war. Comparative Political Studies, 41(8), 1043–1068.
- Kalyvas, S., & Balcells, L. (2010). International system and technologies of rebellion: How the end of the cold war shaped internal conflict. American Political Science Review, 104(3), 415–429.
- Kenny, P. (2010). Structural integrity and cohesion in insurgent organizations: Evidence from protracted conflicts in Ireland and Burma. International Studies Review, 12, 533–555.
- King, G., & Zeng, L. (2001). Logistic regression in rare events data. Political Analysis, 9(2), 137–163.
- Kodikara, S. (1989). The continuing crisis in Sri Lanka: The JVP, the Indian troops, and Tamil politics. Asian Survey, 29(7), 716–724.
- Krause, P. (2017). Rebel power: Why nationalist movements compete, fight and win. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
- Lee, S. (2014). Why factions switch sides in civil wars: Rivalry, patronage, and realignment in sudan. International Security, 39(2), 92–131.
- Leitgöb, H. (2013). The problem of rare events in maximum likelihood logistic regression - assessing potential remedies. Presentation at the 2013 European Survey Research Association, Ljubljana.
- Long, S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Lounsbery, M. O. (2016). Foreign military intervention, power dynamics, and rebel group cohesion. Journal of Global Security Studies, 1(2), 127–141.
- Lujala, P. (2009). Deadly combat over natural resources: Gems, petroleum, drugs and the severity of armed conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53(1), 50–73.
- McLauchlin, T., & Pearlman, W. (2012). Out-group conflict, in-group unity? Exploring the effect of repression on intramovement cooperation. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 56(1), 41–66.
- Mosinger, E. (2018). Brothers or others in arms? Civilian constituencies and rebel fragmentation in civil war. Journal of Peace Research, 55(1), 62–77.
- Nilsson, D. (2010). Turning weakness into strength: Military capabilities, multiple rebel groups and negotiated settlements. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 27(3), 253–271.
- Otto, S. (2018). The grass is always greener? Armed group side switching in civil wars. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 62(7), 1459–1488.
- Pischedda, C. (2018). Wars within wars: Why windows of opportunity and vulnerability cause inter-rebel fighting in internal conflicts. International Security, 43(1), 138–176.
- Pool, D. (2001). From guerrillas to government: The Eritrean people’s liberation front. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.
- Ramesh, R. (2004, April 9). Tamil Tigers turn on each other. The Guardian, Fri. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/apr/10/srilanka
- Rudloff, P., & Finley, M. (2016). The downstream effects of combatant fragmentation on civil war recurrence. Journal of Peace Research, 53(1), 19–32.
- Salehyan, I., Gleditsch, K., & Cunningham, D. (2011). Explaining external support for insurgent groups. International Organization, 65(4), 709–744.
- Sanín, F. G., & Giustozzi, A. (2010). Networks and armies: Structuring rebellion in Colombia and Afghanistan. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 33(9), 836–853.
- Schulhofer-Wohl, J. (2016). Fighting between allies and the civil war in Syria. The Political Science of Syria’s Civil War. POMEPS Studies, 5, 42–44.
- Seymour, L., Bakke, K. M., & Cunningham, K. G. (2016). E pluribus unum, ex uno plures: Competition, violence, and fragmentation in ethnopolitical movements. Journal of Peace Research, 53(1), 3–18.
- Staniland, P. (2014). Networks of rebellion: Explaining insurgent cohesion and collapse. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
- Szentkirályi, L., & Burch, M. (2018). An umbrella of legitimacy: Rebel faction size and external military intervention. International Political Science Review, 39(4), 515–530.
- Tamm, H. (2016). Rebel leaders, internal rivals, and external resources: How state sponsors affect insurgent cohesion. International Studies Quarterly, 60(4), 599–610.
- Uppsala Conflict Data Program. 2019. UCDP Conflict Encyclopedia. Uppsala University. Retrieved January 7, 2019, from www.ucdp.uu.se
- Walter, B. (2019). Explaining the number of rebel groups in civil wars. International Interactions, 45(1), 1–27.
- Weinstein, J. (2007). Inside rebellion: The politics of insurgent violence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Weiss, G. (2012). The Cage: The fight for Sri Lanka and the last days of the Tamil Tigers. New York, NY: Bellevue Literary Press.
- Woldemariam, M. (2018). Insurgent fragmentation in the Horn of Africa: Rebellion and its discontents. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.