46
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Surgery for epimacular membrane and vitreomacular traction syndrome

, , &
Pages 407-414 | Received 19 Jul 2016, Accepted 18 Oct 2016, Published online: 07 Nov 2016

References

  • Mitchell P, Smith W, Chey T, et al. Prevalence and associations of epiretinal membranes the blue mountains eye study, Australia. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:1033–1040.
  • Roth AM, Foos RY. Surface wrinkling retinopathy in eyes enucleated at autopsy. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1971;75:1047.
  • Wise GN. Clinical features of idiopathic preretinal macular fibrosis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1975;79:349.
  • Messmer EM, Heidenkummer HP, Kampik A. Ultrastructure of epiretinal membranes associated with macular holes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1998;236:248–254.
  • Kampik A, Green WR, Michels RG, et al. Ultrastructural features of progressive idiopathic epiretinal membrane removed by vitreous surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 1980;90:797–809.
  • Kampik A, Kenyon KR, Michels RG, et al. Epiretinal and vitreous membranes comparative study of 56 cases. Arch Ophthalmol. 1981;99:1445–1454.
  • Gandorfer A, Rohleder M, Kampik A. Epiretinal pathology of vitreomacular traction syndrome. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86(8):902–909.
  • Zhao F, Gandorfer A, Haritoglou C, et al. Epiretinal cell proliferation in macular pucker and vitreomacular traction syndrome: analysis of flat-mounted internal limiting membrane specimens. Retina. 2013;33(1):77–88.
  • Bu SC, Kuijer R, Van Der Worp RJ, et al. Glial cells and collagens in epiretinal membranes associated with idiopathic macular holes. Retina. 2014;34(5):897–906.
  • Schumann RG, Gandorfer A, Ziada J, et al. Hyalocytes in idiopathic epiretinal membranes: a correlative light and electron microscopic study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014;252(12):1887–1894.
  • Sebag J. The vitreoretinal interface and its role in the pathogenesis of vitreomaculopathies. Ophthalmologe. 2015;112(1):10–19.
  • Haritoglou C, Schumann R, Reiniger I, et al. Evaluation of the internal limiting membrane after conventional peeling during macular hole surgery. Retina. 2006;26(1):21–24.
  • Park DW, Dugel PU, Garda J, et al. Macular pucker removal with and without internal limiting membrane peeling: pilot study. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:62–64.
  • Haritoglou C, Gass CA, Schaumberger M, et al. Macular changes after peeling of the internal limiting membrane in macular hole surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;132:363–369.
  • Sivalingam A, Eagle RC Jr, Duker JS, et al. Visual prognosis correlated with the presence of internal-limiting membrane in histopathologic specimens obtained from epiretinal membrane surgery. Ophthalmology. 1990;97:1549–1552.
  • Steven P, Laqua H, Wong D, et al. Secondary paracentral retinal holes following internal limiting membrane removal. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90(3):293–295.
  • Semeraro F, Morescalchi F, Duse S, et al. Current trends about inner limiting membrane peeling in surgery for epiretinal membranes. J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:671905. Epub 2015 Sep 3. DOI:10.1155/2015/671905
  • Kim M, Park YS, Lee DH, et al. Comparison of surgical outcome of 23-gaugea and 25-gauge microincision vitrectomy surgery fort he management of idiopathic epiretinal membrane in pseudophakic eyes. Retina. 2015;35(10):2115–2120.
  • Mentens R1, Stalmans P. Comparison of postoperative comfort in 20 gauge versus 23 gauge pars plana vitrectomy. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol. 2009;311:5–10.
  • Rizzo S, Genovesi-Ebert F, Murri S, et al. 25-gauge, sutureless vitrectomy and standard 20-gauge pars plana vitrectomy in idiopathic epiretinal membrane surgery: a comparative pilot study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;244(4):472–479.
  • Farah ME, Maia M, Penha FM, et al. The use of vital dyes during vitreoretinal surgery - chromovitrectomy. Dev Ophthalmol. 2016;55:365–375.
  • Koehrer P, Bron AM, Dugas B, et al. Comparison between subjective and objective internal limiting membrane peeling area during epiretinal membrane surgery. Retina. 2014;34(7):1335–1340.
  • Haritoglou C, Schumann RG, Kampik A, et al. Heavy brilliant blue G for internal limiting membrane staining. Retina. 2011;31(2):405–407.
  • Sakamoto T, Ishibashi T. Visualizing vitreous in vitrectomy by triamcinolone. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009;247(9):1153–1163.
  • Haritoglou C, Gandorfer A, Schaumberger M, et al. Trypan blue in macular pucker surgery: an evaluation of histology and functional outcome. Retina. 2004;24:582–590.
  • Perrier M, Sebag M. Epiretinal membrane surgery assisted by trypan blue. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135:909–911.
  • Schumann R, Gandorfer A, Priglinger SG, et al. Vital dyes for macular surgery: a comparative electron microscopy study of the internal limiting membrane. Retina. 2009;29(5):669–676.
  • Figueroa MS, Rebolleda G, Noval S, et al. Evaluation of trypan-blue toxicity in macular hole surgery with electroretinography. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2008;83(11):659–664.
  • Oberstein SYL, Mura M, Tan SH, et al. Heavy trypan blue staining of epiretinal membranes: an alternative to infracyanine green. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91(7):955–957.
  • Haritoglou C, Schumann RG, Strauss R, et al. Vitreoretinal surgery using bromphenol blue as a vital stain: evaluation of staining characteristics in humans. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91(9):1125–1128.
  • Haritoglou C1, Mauell S, Benoit M, et al. Vital dyes increase the rigidity of the internal limiting membrane. Eye. 2013;27(11):1308–1315.
  • Kadonosono K, Itoh N, Uchio E, et al. Staining of the internal limiting membrane in macular hole surgery. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:1116–1118.
  • Bradley EC, Barr JW. Determination of blood volume using indocyanine green (cardio-green) dye. Life Sci. 1968;7:1001–1007.
  • Lund-Johansen P. The dye dilution method for measurement of cardiac output. Eur Heart J. 1990;11(suppl):6–12.
  • Craandijk A, Van Beek CA. Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography of the choroid. Br J Ophthalmol. 1976;60:377–385.
  • Haritoglou C, Gandorfer A, Gass CA, et al. Indocyanine green-assisted peeling of the internal limiting membrane in macular hole surgery affects visual outcome: a clinicopathologic correlation. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;134:836.
  • Engelbrecht NE, Freeman J, Sternberg P Jr, et al. Retinal pigment epithelial changes after macular hole surgery with indocyanine green-assisted internal limiting membrane peeling. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;133:89–94.
  • Haritoglou C, Gandorfer A, Gass CA, et al. The effect of indocyanine-green on functional outcome of macular pucker surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135:328–337.
  • Gandorfer A, Haritoglou C, Kampik A. Toxicity of indocyanine green in vitreoretinal surgery. Dev Ophthalmol. 2008;42:69–81.
  • Haritoglou C, Langhals H, Kampik A. Indocyanine green should not be used to facilitate removal of the internal limiting membrane in macular hole surgery. Surv Ophthalmol. 2009;54(1):138–141.
  • Henrich PB, Priglinger SG, Haritoglou C, et al. Quantification of contrast recognizability during Brilliant Blue G (BBG) and Indocyanine Green (ICG) Assisted Chromovitrectomy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(7):4345–4349.
  • Langhals H, Varja A, Laubichler P, et al. Cyanine dyes as optical contrast agents for ophthalmological surgery. J Med Chem. 2011;54(11):3903–3925.
  • Enaida H, Hisatomi T, Hata Y, et al. Brilliant blue G selectively stains the internal limiting membrane/brilliant blue G-assisted membrane peeling. Retina. 2006;26:631–636.
  • Enaida H, Hisatomi T, Goto Y, et al. Preclinical investigation of internal limiting membrane staining and peeling using intravitreal brilliant blue G. Retina. 2006;26:623–630.
  • Remy M, Thaler S, Schumann RG, et al. An in-vivo evaluation of Brilliant Blue G in animals and humans. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92:1142–1147.
  • Lüke M, Januschowski K, Beutel J, et al. Electrophysiological effects of Brilliant Blue G in the model of the isolated perfused vertebrate retina. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008;246(6):817–822.
  • Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Wirbelauer C, et al. Influence of indocyanine green staining on the biomechanical strength of porcine internal limiting membrane. Ophthalmologica. 2004;218(4):278–282.
  • Stalmans P, Freon EJ, Parys-Van Ginderdeuren R, et al. Double vital staining using trypan blue and infracyanine green in macular pucker surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87:713–716.
  • Duker JS, Kaiser PK, Binder S, et al. The international vitreomacular traction study group classification of vitreomacular adhesion, traction, and macular hole. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(12):2611–2619.
  • Inoue M, Kadonosono K. Macular diseases: epiretinal membrane. Dev Ophthalmol. 2014;54:159–163.
  • Rouvas A, Chatziralli I, Androu A, et al. Long-term anatomical and functional results in patients undergoing observation for idiopathic nontractional epiretinal membrane. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2016;26(3):273–278.
  • Laban KG, Scheerlinck LM, Van Leeuwen R. Prognostic factors associated with visual outcome after pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Ophthalmologica. 2015;234(3):119–126.
  • Kinoshita T, Imaizumi H, Miyamoto H, et al. Two-year results of metamorphopsia, visual acuity, and optical coherence tomographic parameters after epiretinal membrane surgery. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016;254(6):1041–1049.
  • Okamoto F, Sugiura Y, Okamoto Y, et al. Inner nuclear layer thickness as a prognostic factor for metamorphopsia after epiretinal membrane surgery. Retina. 2015;35(10):2107–2114.
  • Ooto S, Hangai M, Takayama K, et al. High-resolution imaging of the photoreceptor layer in epiretinal membrane using adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(5):873–881.
  • Haritoglou C, Neubauer AS, Reiniger IW, et al. Long-term functional outcome of macular hole surgery correlated to optical coherence tomography measurements. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2007;35(3):208–213.
  • Mayer WJ, Vogel M, Neubauer A, et al. Pars plana vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane peeling in epimacular membranes: correlation of function and morphology across the macula. Ophthalmologica. 2013;230(1):9–17.
  • Dal Vecchio M, Lavia C, Nassisi M, et al. Microperimetric assessment after epiretinal membrane surgery: 4-year follow-up. J Ophthalmol. 2016;2016:7030791. DOI:10.1155/2016/7030791.
  • Nguyen JH, Yee KM, Sadun AA, et al. Quantifying visual dysfunction and the response to surgery in macular pucker. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(7):1500–1510.
  • Mathews NR, Tarima S, Kim DG, et al. Foveal contour changes following surgery for idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(12):7754–7760.
  • Matsuoka Y, Tanito M, Takai Y, et al. Visual function and vision-related quality of life after vitrectomy for epiretinal membranes: a 12-month follow-up study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(6):3054–3058.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.