Diagnostic accuracy of machine learning classifiers for cataracts: a systematic review and meta-analysis

References

• Liu Y-C, Wilkins M, Kim T, et al. Cataracts. Lancet. 2017;390(10094):600–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asbell PA, Dualan I, Mindel J, et al. Age-related cataract. Lancet. 2005;365(9459):599–609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma AK, Aslami AN, Srivastava JP, et al. Visual outcome of traumatic cataract at a tertiary eye care centre in North India: a prospective study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(1):NC05–NC8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu X, Long E, Lin H, et al. Prevalence and epidemiological characteristics of congenital cataract: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):28564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khairallah M, Kahloun R, Bourne R, et al. Number of people blind or visually impaired by cataract worldwide and in world regions, 1990 to 2010. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(11):6762–6769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascolini D, Mariotti SP. Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96(5):614–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ono K, Hiratsuka Y, Murakami A. Global inequality in eye health: country-level analysis from the global burden of disease study. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(9):1784–1788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chylack LT Jr, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, et al. The Lens Opacities Classification System III. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111(6):831–836.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gali HE, Sella R, Afshari NA. Cataract grading systems: a review of past and present. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2019;30(1):13–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen D, Vasavada A. Cataract and surgery for cataract. BMJ. 2006;333(7559):128–132.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lamminen H, Voipio V, Ruohonen K, et al. Telemedicine in ophthalmology. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2003;81(2):105–109.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saleem SM, Pasquale LR, Sidoti PA, et al. Virtual ophthalmology: telemedicine in a COVID-19 era. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020;216:237–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung R, Yu B, Iordanous Y, et al. The prevalence of occupational burnout among ophthalmologists: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Rep. 2021;124(5):2139–2154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewa CS, Loong D, Bonato S, et al. How does burnout affect physician productivity? A systematic literature review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alejandra C, Tomasz M, Rozema JJ. Introduction to machine learning for ophthalmologists. Semin Ophthalmol. 2019;34(1):19–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Zhang Y, Yao Z, et al. Machine learning based detection of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and diabetic macular edema (DME) from optical coherence tomography (OCT) images. Biomed Opt Express. 2016;7(12):4928–4940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan JH, Bhandary SV, Sivaprasad S, et al. Age-related macular degeneration detection using deep convolutional neural network. Future Gener Comput Syst. 2018;87:127–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devalla SK, Liang Z, Pham TH, et al. Glaucoma management in the era of artificial intelligence. Br J Ophthalmol. 2020;104(3):301–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamzah H, Lim G, Duc Nguyen Q, et al. Artificial intelligence using deep learning system for glaucoma suspect detection. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59(9):4074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usher D, Dumskyj M, Himaga M, et al. Automated detection of diabetic retinopathy in digital retinal images: a tool for diabetic retinopathy screening. Diabet Med. 2004;21(1):84–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch SK, Folk JC, Abramoff MD. Autonomous artificial intelligence (AI) reliably detects diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019;60(9):1537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullah W, Pathan SK, Panchal A, et al. Cost-effectiveness and diagnostic accuracy of telemedicine in macular disease and diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(25):e20306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murtagh P, Greene G, O’Brien C. Current applications of machine learning in the screening and diagnosis of glaucoma: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Int J Ophthalmol. 2020;13(1):149–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the prisma statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiting PF, Rutjes AWS, Westwood ME, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(8):529–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acharya RU, Yu W, Zhu K, et al. Identification of cataract and post-cataract surgery optical images using artificial intelligence techniques. J Med Syst. 2010;34(4):619–628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao L, Li H, Zhang Y, et al. Hierarchical method for cataract grading based on retinal images using improved Haar wavelet. Inf Fusion. 2020;53:196–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong Y, Zhang Q, Qiao Z, et al. Classification of cataract fundus image based on deep learning. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques (IST) Beijing, China. 2017:1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Guo L, Yang -J-J, Peng L, et al. A computer-aided healthcare system for cataract classification and grading based on fundus image analysis. Comput Ind. 2015;69:72–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang W, Li H, Chan KL, et al. A computer-aided diagnosis system of nuclear cataract via ranking. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2009;12(Pt 2):803–810.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li H, Lim JH, Liu J, et al. An automatic diagnosis system of nuclear cataract using slit-lamp images. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;2009(101243413 PG–3693–6):3693–3696.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li H, Lim JH, Liu J, et al. A computer-aided diagnosis system of nuclear cataract. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2010;57(7 PG–1690–8):1690–1698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Xu X, Guan Y, et al. Automatic cataract diagnosis by image-based interpretability. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Miyazaki, Japan 2018:3964–3969.
   Google Scholar
• Lin H, Li R, Liu Z, et al. Diagnostic efficacy and therapeutic decision-making capacity of an artificial intelligence platform for childhood cataracts in eye clinics: a multicentre randomized controlled trial. EClinicalMedicine. 2019;9:52–59.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin D, Chen J, Lin Z, et al. A practical model for the identification of congenital cataracts using machine learning. EBioMedicine. 2020;51:102621.
   Google Scholar
• Liu X, Jiang J, Zhang K, et al. Localization and diagnosis framework for pediatric cataracts based on slit-lamp images using deep features of a convolutional neural network. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(3 PG–e0168606):e0168606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratap T, Kokil P. Computer-aided diagnosis of cataract using deep transfer learning. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2019;53:101533.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ran J, Niu K, He Z, et al. Cataract detection and grading based on combination of deep convolutional neural network and random forests. Proceedings of IC-NIDC 2018 Guiyang, China 2018:155–159.
   Google Scholar
• Mk SV, G R. Computer-aided diagnosis of anterior segment eye abnormalities using visible wavelength image analysis based machine learning. J Med Syst. 2018;42(7):128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu X, Huang Y, Liu Z, et al. Universal artificial intelligence platform for collaborative management of cataracts. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019;103(11 PG–1553–1560):1553–1560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang JJ, Li J, Shen R, et al. Exploiting ensemble learning for automatic cataract detection and grading. Compu Methods Programs Biomed. 2016;124(doh, 8506513 PG–45–57):45–57.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang L, Li J, Zhang I, et al. Automatic cataract detection and grading using deep convolutional neural network. IEEE 14th International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control (ICNSC), Calabria. 2017:60–65.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng J, Guo L, Peng L, et al. Fundus image based cataract classification. IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques (IST) Proceedings, Santorini, Greece. 2014:90–94.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Li Q, Li H. Automatic cataract classification using deep neural network with discrete state transition. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2020;39(2 PG–436–446):436–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu X, Zhang L, Li J, et al. A hybrid global-local representation CNN model for automatic cataract grading. IEEE J Biomed Heal Informatics. 2020;24(2):556–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimizu E, Yazu H, Aketa N, et al. Innovative artificial intelligence-based cataract diagnostic method uses a slit-lamp video recording device and multiple machine-learning. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2021;62:1031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman DG, Bland JM. Diagnostic tests. 1: sensitivity and specificity. BMJ. 1994;308(6943):1552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315(7109):629–634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar