Hypersonic vitrectomy: a novel approach to vitreous removal

References

• Machemer R, Buettner H, Norton EW, et al. Vitrectomy: a pars plana approach. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1971 Aug;75(4):813–820.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Machemer R. The development of pars plana vitrectomy: a personal account. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1995 Aug;233(8):453–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peyman GA, Dodich NA. Experimental vitrectomy. Instrumentation and surgical technique. Arch Ophthalmol. 1971 Nov;86(5):548–551.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kelman CD. Phaco-emulsification and aspiration. A new technique of cataract removal. A preliminary report. Am J Ophthalmol. 1967 Jul;64(1):23–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girard LJ, Hawkins RS. Cataract extraction by ultrasonic aspiration vitrectomy by ultrasonic aspiration. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1974 Feb;78(1):50–59.
   Google Scholar
• Girard LJ. Lensectomy through the pars plana by ultrasonic fragmentation (USF). Ophthalmology. 1979 Nov;86(11):1985–1993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grzybowski A, Kanclerz P. Early descriptions of vitreous surgery. Retina. 2021 Jul 1;41(7):1364–1372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford V. Proposed surgical treatment of opaque vitreous. Lancet. 1890 Mar;135(3470):462–463.
   Google Scholar
• Dodo T, Okuzawa Y, Baba N. Trans-pupillary resection of vitreous body opacity. Ganka. 1969 Jan;11(1):38–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cerasoli JR, Kasner D. A follow-up study of vitreous loss during cataract surgery managed by anterior vitrectomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1971 May;71(5):1040–1043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Malley C, Heintz RM. Vitrectomy via the pars plana–a new instrument system. Trans Pac Coast Otoophthalmol Soc Annu Meet. 1972;53:121–137.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Charles S. Fluidics and cutter dynamics. Dev Ophthalmol. 2014;54:31–37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fujii GY, De Juan E, Humayun MS, et al. Initial experience using the transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy system for vitreoretinal surgery. Ophthalmology. 2002 Oct;109(10):1814–1820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Oliveira PRC, Berger AR, Chow DR. Vitreoretinal instruments: vitrectomy cutters, endoillumination and wide-angle viewing systems. Int J Retina Vitreous. 2016;2(1):28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stalmans P. 23-gauge vitrectomy. Dev Ophthalmol. 2014;54:38–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mura M, Barca F. 25-Gauge vitrectomy. Dev Ophthalmol. 2014;54:45–53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Osawa S, Oshima Y. 27-Gauge vitrectomy. Dev Ophthalmol. 2014;54:54–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Magalhães O, Maia M, Maia A, et al. Fluid dynamics in three 25-gauge vitrectomy systems: principles for use in vitreoretinal surgery. Acta Ophthalmol. 2008 Mar;86(2):156–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witmer MT, Dugel PU. Machines and cutters: constellation®. Dev Ophthalmol. 2014;54:1–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lai TYY. Machines and Cutters: stellaris PC. Dev Ophthalmol. 2014;54:8–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lai JM, Patel V, Watane A, et al. Mechanical property comparison of 23-, 25-, and 27-gauge vitrectors across vitrectomy systems. Ophthalmol Retina. 2022 May 13;S2468-6530(22):00238–X.
   Google Scholar
• Sharif-Kashani P, Nishida K, Pirouz Kavehpour H, et al. Effect of cut rates on fluidic behavior of chopped vitreous. Retina. 2013 Jan;33(1):166–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato T, Kusaka S, Oshima Y, et al. Analyses of cutting and aspirating properties of vitreous cutters with high-speed camera. Retina. 2008 May;28(5):749–754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeira A, Chong LP, Matsuoka N, et al. Vitreoretinal traction created by conventional cutters during vitrectomy. Ophthalmology. 2010 Jul;117(7):1387–1392.e2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubschman JP, Bourges JL, Tsui I, et al. Effect of cutting phases on flow rate in 20-, 23-, and 25-gauge vitreous cutters. Retina. 2009 Oct;29(9):1289–1293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima LH, Deboer C, McCormick M, et al. A new dual port cutter system for vitrectomy surgery. Retina. 2010 Oct;30(9):1515–1519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin X, Apple D, Hu J, et al. Advancements of vitreoretinal surgical machines. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2017 May;28(3):242–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oravecz R, Uthoff D, Schrage N, et al. Comparison of modern high-speed vitrectomy systems and the advantages of using dual-bladed probes. Int J Retina Vitreous. 2021 Jan 19;7(1):8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leitgeb N, Schuy S, Zirm M. Ultrasonic vitrectomy – an alternative technique to presently used mechanical procedures. Experimental results. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol. 1979 Feb 8;209(4):263–268.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wuchinich D. Ultrasonic Vitrectomy Instrument. Phys Procedia. 2015;63:217–222.
   Google Scholar
• Deuchler S, Knoch T, Papour A, et al. Pars plana vitrectomy-from suction cutting systems to ultrasound technology : vitesse-a new form of vitrectomy based on ultrasound technology. Ophthalmologe. 2021 Jul;118(7):741–746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzo S, Fantoni G, Mucciolo DP, et al. Ultrasound In vitrectomy: an alternative approach to traditional vitrectomy techniques. Retina. 2020 Jan;40(1):24–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papour A, Kolesnitchenko V, Goh TS, et al. Dependency of vitreous flow on drive frequency in hypersonic vitrectomy device. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020 Jun 10;61(7):3716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanga PE, Pastor-Idoate S, Zambrano I, et al. Performance analysis of a new hypersonic vitrector system. Vavvas DG, editor. PloS ONE. 2017 Jun 6;12(6):e0178462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stocchino A, Nepita I, Repetto R, et al. Fluid dynamic assessment of hypersonic and guillotine vitrectomy probes in viscoelastic vitreous substitutes. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020 May;9(6):9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papour A, Goh T. Vitesse high frequency upgrade and performance benchmarks, Bausch + Lomb report No. 128004106. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Aznabaev BM, Dibaev TI, Mukhamadeev TR, et al. Twenty-five gauge ultrasonic vitrectomy: experimental and clinical performance analysis. Retina. 2020 Jul;40(7):1443–1450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pastor-Idoate S, Bonshek R, Irion L, et al. Ultrastructural and histopathologic findings after pars plana vitrectomy with a new hypersonic vitrector system. Qualitative preliminary assessment. PLoS One. 2017;12(4):e0173883.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollister J, Hubschman J. Vitreous extensional rheology, Engineering Report for Bausch & Lomb. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Karthik N, Kolesnitchenko V, Srivastava S. Evaluating surgical efficiency measures of hypersonic vitrectomy cutters and guillotine cutters. ASRS Annual Meeting; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Papour A, Smith T. Vitesse 25-gauge physical properties and comparison to pneumatic cutters, bausch + Lomb report No. 128004109. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Blinder K, Awh C, Render J. Vitrectomy surgery pilot study for evaluation of a micro-static cutter in a swine model, NAMSA report to Bausch & Lomb CEP 12191. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Ch’ng SW, Irion LD, Bonshek R, et al. Live porcine thirty days delayed recovery surgery: qualitative findings with the hypersonic vitrectomy. PLoS One. 2018;13(6):e0197038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolesnitchenko V, Bergmann N, McCary B, et al. Thermal effects of vitesse hypersonic vitrector during simulated surgery. ARVO Annual Meeting; 2017; Baltimore, MD, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Papour A, Taylor J, Zulkifli A, et al. Acoustic power measurements of ultrasonic vitrectomy device and the effects in pig eyes. ARVO Annual Meeting; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Schafer M. Report on measurements and analysis conducted for bausch + Lomb Report Number: STI136, Sonic Tech Inc. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Stanga PE, Williams JI, Shaarawy SA, et al. First-in-human clinical study to investigate the effectiveness and safety of pars plana vitrectomy surgery using a new hypersonic technology. Retina. 2020 Jan;40(1):16–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blinder KJ, Awh CC, Tewari A, et al. Introduction to hypersonic vitrectomy. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2019 May;30(3):133–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivera WI, Loria A, Behrens A, et al. Evaluation of safety outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy surgery using the hypersonic vitrector system: case series. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020 Jun 10;61(7):3731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romano MR, Caretti L, Ferrara M, et al. Twenty-three-gauge hypersonic vitrectomy: real-world surgical evidence. Retina. 2021 Dec 1;41(12):2523–2530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch FHJ, Scholtz J, Knoch T, et al. The use of hypersonic vitrectomy as a novel approach for retinal reattachment surgery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2022 Jun 1;63(7):3414-F0314-3414–F0314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blinder K, Kolesnitchenko V, Papour A, et al. Vitesse silicone oil removal. ASRS Annual Meeting; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Jabbour N, Bouferraa Y, Papour A, et al. The role of subretinal surgery in the treatment of resistant choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration. ASRS Annual Meeting; 2021; San Antonio, TX, USA.
   Google Scholar