Why are soft contact lens wear discontinuation rates still too high?

References

• Morgan PB, Chamberlain P, Moody K, et al. Ocular physiology and comfort in neophyte subjects fitted with daily disposable silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Cont Lens Ant Eye. 2013;36(3):118–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolffsohn JS, Ghorbani-Mojarrad N, Vianya-Estopa M, et al. Fast versus gradual adaptation of soft monthly contact lenses in neophyte wearers. Cont Lens Ant Eye. 2020;43:268–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulley A, Young G, Hunt C, et al. Retention rates in new contact lens wearers. Eye Cont Lens. 2018;44:S273–S282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickson-Curran S, Spyridon M, Hunt C, et al. The use of daily disposable lenses in problematic reusable contact lens wearers. Cont Lens Ant Eye. 2014;37:285–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pucker AD, Tichenor AA. A review of contact lens dropout. Clin Optom. 2020;12:85–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orsborn G, Dumbleton K. Eye care professional’s perceptions of the benefits of daily disposable silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Cont Lens Ant Eye. 2019;42:373–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kojima T. Contact lens-associated dry eye disease: recent advances Worldwide and in Japan. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59:DES102–DES108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young G, Chalmers RL, Napier L, et al. Characterizing contact lens-related dryness symptoms in a cross-section of UK soft lens wearers. Cont Lens Ant Eye. 2011;34:64–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumbleton K, Woods CA, Jones LW, et al. The impact of contemporary contact lenses on contact lens discontinuation. Eye Cont Lens. 2013;39:93–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markoulli M, Kolanu S. Contact lens wear and dry eyes: challenges and solutions. Clin Optom. 2017;9:41–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols JJ, Willcox MDP, Bron AJ, et al. TFOS workshop members. The TFOS international workshop on contact lens discomfort: executive summary. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(11):TFOS7–TFOS13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin-Montanez V, Lopez-de la Rosa A, Lpez-Miguel A, et al. End-of-day dryness, corneal sensitivity and blink rate in contact lens wearers. Cont Lens Ant Eye. 2015;38:148–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basuthkar S, Guillon M, NcNally J, et al. Understanding comfort changes associated with contact lens aging. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020;61:1486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arita R, Fukuoka S, Morishige N. Meibomian gland dysfunction and contact lens discomfort. Eye Cont Lens. 2017;43:17–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapkota K, Franco S, Sampaio P, et al. Effect of three months of soft contact lens wear on conjunctival cytology. Clin Exp Optom. 2016;99:336–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Posadas L, Contreras-Ruiz L, Soriano-Romani L, et al. Conjunctival goblet cell function: effect of contact lens wear and cytokines. Eye Cont Lens. 2016;42:83–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truong TN, Graham AD, Lin MC. Factors in contact lens symptoms: evidence from a multistudy database. Optom Vis Sci. 2014;91(2):133–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers RL, Young G, Kern J, et al. Soft contact lens-related symptoms in North America an the United Kingdom. Optom Vis Sci. 2016;93:836–847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gipson IK, Hori Y, Argueso P. Character of the ocular surface mucins and their alteration in dry eye disease. Ocul Surf. 2004;2:131–148.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baudouin C, Rolando M, Benitez Del Castillo JM, et al. Reconsidering the central role of mucins in dry eye and ocular surface diseases. Prog Ret Eye Res. 2018;71:68–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMonnies CW. Better methods of clinically assessing mucus functions are required. J Optom. 2017;10:69–70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tsubota K, Yamada M. Corneal epithelial alterations induced by disposable contact lens wear. Ophthalmology. 1992;99:1193–1196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron N. Contact lens-induced changes in the anterior eye as observed in vivo with the confocal microscope. Prog Ret Eye Res. 2007;26:398–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramamoorthy P, Nichols JJ. Mucins in contact lens wear and dry eye conditions. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85:E631–E642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muntz A, Subbaraman LN, Sorbara L, et al. Tear exchange and contact lenses: a review. J Optom. 2015;8:2–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Colorado LH, Alzahrani Y, Pritchard N, et al. Time course of changes in goblet cell density in symptomatic and asymptomatic contact lens wearers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57:2888–2894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickert CA, Wittmann B, Fromme R, et al. Highly transparent covalent mucin coatings improve the wettability and tribology of hydrophobic contact lenses. Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12:28024–28033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolffsohn JS, Arita R, Chalmers R, et al. TFOS DEWS II diagnostic methodology report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15:539–574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dartt DA. Neural regulation of lacrimal gland secretory processes: relevance in dry eye diseases. Prog Retinal Eye Res. 2009;28:155–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calonge M, Pinto-Fraga J, Gonzalez-Garcia MJ, et al. Effects of the external environment on dry eye disease. Internat Ophthalmol Clin. 2017;57:23–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Labetoulle M, Baudouin C, Calonge M, et al. Role of corneal nerves in ocular surface homeostasis and disease. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019;97:137–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navascues-Cornago M, Morgan PB, Maldonado-Codina C. Lid margin sensitivity and staining in contact lens wear versus no contact lens wear. Cornea. 2015;34:808–816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korb DR, Greiner JV, Herman JP, et al. Lid-wiper epitheliopathy and dry eye symptoms in contact lens wearers. Claoj. 2002;28:211–216.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Efron N, Brennan NA, Morgan PB, et al. Lid wiper epitheliopathy. Prog Ret Eye Res. 2016;53:140–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kato H, Yokoi N, Watanabe A, et al. Clinical factors for determining the severity of lid wiper epitheliopathy in dry eye. Cornea. 2022;41:545–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMonnies CW. Aqueous deficiency is a contributor to evaporation-related dry eye disease. Eye Vis. 2020;7(6):1–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vidal-Rohr M, Wolffsohn JS, Davies LNCA. Effect of contact lens surface properties on comfort, tear stability and ocular physiology. Cont Lens Ant Eye. 2018;41:117–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navascues-Comago M, Morgan PB, Maldonado-Codina C. Effect of three interventions on contact lens comfort in symptomatic wearers: a randomized clinical trial. PLOS ONE. 2015;1–13. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0135323
   Google Scholar
• McMonnies CW. Diagnosis and remediation of blink inefficiency. Cont Lens Ant Eye. 2021;44(101331):1–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McMonnies CW. Incomplete blinking: exposure keratopathy, lid wiper epitheliopathy, dry eye, refractive surgery, and dry contact lenses. Cont Lens Ant Eye. 2007;30:37–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McMonnies CW. Conjunctival tear layer temperature, evaporation, hyperosmolarity, inflammation, hyperemia, tissue damage and symptoms: an amplifying cascade. Curr Eye Res. 2017;42:1574–1584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purslow C, Wolffsohn JS, Santodomingo-Rubido J. The effect of contact lens wear on dynamic ocular surface temperature. Cont Lens Ant Eye. 2005;28:29–36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sapkota K, Franco S, Lira M. Daily versus monthly disposable contact lens: which is better for ocular surface physiology and comfort? Cont Lens Ant Eye. 2018;41:252–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goyal S, Hamrah P. Understanding neuropathic corneal pain–gaps and current therapeutic approaches. Semin Ophthalmol. 2016;31:59–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dogan AS, Gurdal C, Arslan N. Corneal confocal microscopy and dry eye findings in contact lens discomfort patients. Cont Lens Ant Eye. 2018;41:101–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMonnies CW. Could contact lens dryness discomfort symptoms sometimes have a neuropathic basis? Eye Vis. 2021;8(12):1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu J, Li Z. Resident innate immune cells in the cornea. Front Immun. 2021;12(620284):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Wu T, Bril AAV, Ng E, et al. Variables associated with corneal confocal microscopy parameters in healthy volunteers: implications for diabetic neuropathy screening. Diabetic Med. 2012;29:e297–e303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomes JAP, Santo RM. The impact of dry eye disease treatment on patient satisfaction and quality of life: a review. Ocul Surf. 2019;17:9–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMonnies CW. Why the symptoms and objective signs of dry eye disease may not correlate. J Optom. 2021;14:3–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haller H, Cramer H, Lauche R, et al. Somatoform disorders and medically unexplained symptoms in primary care. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015;112:279–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katon WJ, Walker EA. Medically unexplained symptoms in primary care. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59(Supp 20):15–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mergl R, Seidscheck I, Allgaier A-K, et al. Depressive, anxiety, and somatoform disorders in primary care: prevalence and recognition. Depress Anxiety. 2007;24:185–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Sun S, Sun X, et al. Differences of anxiety and depression in dry eye disease patients according to age groups. Front Psychiatry. 2022;13(930714):1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Nortey J, Shiboski C, Rose-Nussbaumer J, et al. How are Sicca Signs and Symptoms Associated with Depression Amongst Men Classified With and Without Sjogren Disease? Am J Ophthalmol. 2022;Ahead of print. DOI:10.1016/j.ajo.2022.09.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards TM, Stern A, Clarke DD, et al. The treatment of patients with medically unexplained symptoms in primary care: a review of the literature. Mental Health Fam Med. 2010;7:209–221.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Greene-Shortridge TM, Britt TW, Castro CA. The stigma of mental health problems in the military. Milit Med. 2007;72:157–161.
   Google Scholar
• Li Y, Li G, liu L, et al. Correlations between mobile phone addiction and anxiety, depression, impulsivity, and poor sleep quality among college students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Behav Addict. 2020;3:551–571.
   Google Scholar
• Golebiowski B, Long J, Harrison K, et al. Smartphone use and effects on tear film, blinking and binocular vision. Curr Eye Res. 2020;45:428–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolffsohn JS, Wang MTM, Vidal-Rohr M, et al. Demographic and lifestyle risk factors of dry eye disease subtypes: a cross-sectional study. Ocul Surf. 2021;21:58–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kojima T, Ibrahim OM, Wakamatsu T, et al. The impact of contact lens wear and visual display terminal work on ocular surface and tear functions in office workers. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;152:933–940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korb DR, Henriquez AS. Meibomian gland dysfunction and contact lens intolerance. J Am Optom Assoc. 1980;51:243–251.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Young G, Chalmers R, Napier L, et al. Soft contact lens-related dryness with and without clinical signs. Optom Vis Sci. 2012;89:1125–1132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel SV, McLaren JW, Hodge DO, et al. Confocal microscopy in vivo in corneas of long-term contact lens wearers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:995–1003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong J, Zhu W, Zhuang H, et al. In vivo confocal microscopy of conjunctival goblet cells in patients with Sjogren’s syndrome dry eye. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94:1454–1458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bian Y, Ma KK, Hal NE, et al., Neurotrophic keratopathy in the United States; an IRIS registry (intelligent research in sight) analysis, Ophthalmology, 2022;129:1255–1262.
   Google Scholar
• Riley C, Young G, Chalmers R. Prevalence of ocular surface symptoms, signs and uncomfortable hours of wear in contact lens wearers: the effect of refitting with daily-wear silicone hydrogel lenses (Senofilcon A). Eye Cont Lens. 2006;32:281–286.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Llorens-Quintana C, Mousavi M, Szczesna-Iskander D, et al. Non-invasive pr-lens tear film assessment with high speed videokeratoscopy. Cont Lens Ant Eye. 2018;41:18–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods CA, Bentley SA, Fonn D. Temporal changes in contact lens comfort over a day of wear. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2016;36:643–648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serin D, Karshoglu S, Kiyan A, et al. A simple approach to the repeatability of the Schirmer test without anesthesia. Cornea. 2007;26:903–906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig JP, Muntz A, Wang MTM, et al. Developing evidence-based guidance for the treatment of dry eye disease with artificial tear supplements: a six-month multicentre, double-masked randomised controlled trial. Ocul Surf. 2021;20:62–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss SL, Kramer WG. Ocular distribution of cyclosporine following topical administration of OTX-101 in New Zealand white rabbits. J Ocul Pharmacol Therap. 2019;35:395–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMonnies CW. Transdermal anti-inflammatory therapy for aqueous deficiency. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 2021;41:1267–1272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig JP, Nichols KK, Akpek EK, et al. TFOS DEWS II Definition and classification report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15:276–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar