250
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editorial

Perspectives on the clinical feasibility of techniques used in anophthalmic socket reconstruction

Pages 227-230 | Received 30 Jun 2023, Accepted 08 Sep 2023, Published online: 14 Sep 2023

References

  • Vardizer Y, Sobeh T, Landau Prat D, et al. Assessing the results of anophthalmic prostheses. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021;69(7):1876–1881. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2682_20
  • Tonkelaar I, Henkes HE, Leersum GK, Herman Snellen (1834–1908) and Müller’s ‘reform-auge’, et al. A short history of the artificial eye. Doc Ophthalmol. 1991;77(4):349–354. doi: 10.1007/BF00156975
  • Quaranta-Leoni FM, Fiorino MG, Quaranta-Leoni F, et al. Anophthalmic socket syndrome: prevalence, impact, and management strategies. OPTH. 2021;2021:3267–3281.
  • Perry AC. Integrated orbital implants. Adv Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;8:75–81.
  • Jordan DR, Gilberb S, Mawn LA. The bioceramic orbital implant: experience with 107 implants. Ophthalmic Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 2003; 19(2):128–135. doi: 10.1097/01.IOP.0000056027.63698.FE
  • Schellini SA, Marques ME, Padovani CR, et al. Comparison of synthetic hydroxyapatite and porous polyethylene implants in eviscerated rabbit eyes. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;19(2):136–139. doi: 10.1097/01.IOP.0000056028.98833.FF
  • Baino F, Verné E, Fiume E, et al. Bioactive glass and glass-ceramic orbital implants. Int J Appl Ceram Technol. 2019;16(5):1850–1863. doi: 10.1111/ijac.13236
  • Choi YJ, Park C, Jin HC, et al. Outcome of smooth surface tunnel porous polyethylene orbital implants (medpor SST) in children with retinoblastoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013;97(12):1530–1533. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303481
  • Rubin PA, Popham J, Rumelt S, et al. Enhancement of the cosmetic and functional outcome of enucleation with the conical orbital implant. Ophthalmology. 1998;105(5):919–925. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)95038-2
  • Bigheti CP, Peitl O, Ferreira GA, et al. Amplitude of movements with conical or spherical implants in anophthalmic socket. Orbit. 2022;41(6):708–716. doi: 10.1080/01676830.2021.1998914
  • Sung Y, Goldberg RA, Lew H. Periorbital injection of hyaluronic acid gel in patients with deep superior sulcus. J Craniofac Surg. 2020;31(1):271–273. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006060
  • Dave TV, Nayak A, Palo M, et al. Custom ocular prosthesis-related concerns: patient feedback survey-based report vis-à-vis objective clinical grading scales. Orbit. 2021;40(5):357–363. doi: 10.1080/01676830.2020.1797826
  • Galindo-Ferreiro A, Khandekar R, AlHassan S, et al. Dermis-fat graft for anophthalmic socket reconstruction: indications and outcomes. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2018;81(5):366–370. doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.20180073
  • Schellini S, Jorge E, Sousa R, et al. Porous and nonporous orbital implants for treating the anophthalmic socket: a meta-analysis of case series studies. Orbit. 2016;35(2):78–86. doi: 10.3109/01676830.2016.1139591
  • Al Anazi R, Schellini SA, Alhussain H, et al. Outcomes of the use of orbital expanders in the management of congenital anophthalmia. Orbit. 2022;41(6):691–699. doi: 10.1080/01676830.2021.1990350

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.