Anterior segment dysgenesis: current perspectives on management

References

• Reis LM, Semina EV. Genetics of anterior segment dysgenesis disorders. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2011;22(5):314–324. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e328349412b
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito YA, Walter MA. Genomics and anterior segment dysgenesis: a review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014;42(1):13–24. doi: 10.1111/ceo.12152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harissi-Dagher M, Colby K. Anterior segment dysgenesis: Peters anomaly and sclerocornea. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2008;48(2):35–42. doi: 10.1097/IIO.0b013e318169526c
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ma AS, Grigg JR, Jamieson RV. Phenotype-genotype correlations and emerging pathways in ocular anterior segment dysgenesis. Hum Genet. 2019;138(8–9):899–915. doi: 10.1007/s00439-018-1935-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faiq M, Sharma R, Dada R, et al. Genetic, biochemical and clinical insights into primary congenital glaucoma. J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2013;7(2):66–84. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10008-1140
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ko F, Papadopoulos M, Khaw PT. Primary congenital glaucoma. Prog Brain Res. 2015;221:177–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaushik S, Dubey S, Choudhary S, et al. Anterior segment dysgenesis: insights into the genetics and pathogenesis. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022;70(7):2293–2303. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_3223_21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tawara A, Inomata H. Developmental immaturity of the trabecular meshwork in congenital glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1981;92(4):508–525. doi:10.1016/0002-9394(81)90644-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkan O. Pathogenesis of congenital glaucoma: gonioscopic and anatomic observation of the angle of the anterior chamber in the normal eye and in congenital glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1955;40(1):1–11. doi:10.1016/0002-9394(55)92114-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta V, Chaurasia AK, Gupta S, et al. In vivo analysis of angle dysgenesis in primary congenital, juvenile, and adult-onset open angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58(13):6000–6005. doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-22695
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karaconji T, Zagora S, Grigg JR. Approach to childhood glaucoma: a review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022;50(2):232–246. doi:10.1111/ceo.14039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Oliveira RC, Wilson SE. Descemet’s membrane development, structure, function and regeneration. Exp Eye Res. 2020;197:108090. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2020.108090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser TS, Go MS, Kelly MP, et al. Intraoperative mounted optical coherence tomography findings following reversal of optic nerve head cupping in childhood glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2022;243:109–117. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2022.08.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ely AL, El-Dairi MA, Freedman SF. Cupping reversal in pediatric glaucoma–evaluation of the retinal nerve fiber layer and visual field. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;158(5):905–915. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.07.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton DS, Nagao K, Yeung HH, et al. Late-recognized primary congenital glaucoma. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2013;50(4):234–238. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20130423-02
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alayu KS, Shibeshi MA, Alemu AM. Spontaneously arrested bilateral primary congenital glaucoma: a case report from Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2022;32(2):463–466. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v32i2.27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson SDJ, McFarland D. External trabeculotomy for developmental glaucoma. Ophthalmol. 1980;87(4):302–305. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(80)35233-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramer E, Tausch M, Kraemer C. Time of diagnosis, reoperations and long-term results of goniotomy in the treatment of primary congenital glaucoma: a clinical study. Int Ophthalmol. 1996;20(1–3):117–123. doi: 10.1007/BF00212957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton DS, Katsavounidou G. Newborn primary congenital glaucoma. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2005;42:333–341. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20051101-01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghate D, Wang X. Surgical interventions for primary congenital glaucoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;1:Cd008213. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008213.pub2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barkan O. Surgery of congenital glaucoma: review of 196 eyes operated by goniotomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1953;36(11S):1523–1534.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Allen L, Burian HM. Trabeculotomy ab externo. A new glaucoma operation: technique and results of experimental surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 1962;53:19–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandal AK, Gothwal VK, Khanna R. Combined trabeculotomy-trabeculectomy for primary congenital glaucoma: long-term experience from a tertiary referral centre in a developing nation. Acta Ophthalmol. 2022;100(2):e439–e447. doi: 10.1111/aos.14984
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkisian SRJ. An illuminated microcatheter for 360-degree trabeculotomy [corrected] in congenital glaucoma: a retrospective case series. J AAPOS. 2010;14(5):412–416. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2010.07.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck AD, Lynn MJ, Crandall J, et al. Surgical outcomes with 360-degree suture trabeculotomy in poor-prognosis primary congenital glaucoma and glaucoma associated with congenital anomalies or cataract surgery. J AAPOS. 2011;15(1):54–58. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2010.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas C, Bohnsack BL. Rate of complete catheterization of Schlemm’s canal and trabeculotomy success in primary and secondary childhood glaucomas. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020;212:69–78. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.11.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Hazmi A, Awad A, Zwaan J, et al. Correlation between surgical success rate and severity of congenital glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89(4):449–453. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2004.047761
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yalvac IS, Satana B, Suveren A, et al. Success of trabeculotomy in patients with congenital glacuoma operated on within 3 months of birth. Eye (Lond). 2007;21(4):459–464. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waheed S, Ritterband DC, Greenfield DS, et al. Bleb-related ocular infection in children after trabeculectomy with mitomycin C. Ophthalmol. 1997;104(12):2117–2120. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(97)30051-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jabeen S, Noorani S, Memon MN, et al. Success rate of augmented trabeculectomy in primary congenital glaucoma. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2022;59(3):180–186. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20211027-01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck AD, Freedman SF, Kammer J, et al. Aqueous shunt devices compared with trabeculectomy with mitomycin-C for children in the first two years of life. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;136(6):994–1000. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9394(03)00714-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Netland PA, Walton DS. Glaucoma drainage implants in pediatric patients. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 1993;24(11):723–729. doi: 10.3928/1542-8877-19931101-04
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson A, Besirli CG, Bohnsack BL. Outcomes of Baerveldt glaucoma drainage devices in pediatric eyes. J Glaucoma. 2021 Dec 21;21(1). doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-01827-4
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson A, Bohnsack BL. Ologen augmentation of Ahmed valves in pediatric glaucomas. J AAPOS. 2022;26(3):e1–122.e126. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2022.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozgonul C, Besirli CG, Bohnsack BL. Combined vitrectomy and glaucoma drainage device implantation surgical approach for complex pediatric glaucomas. J AAPOS. 2017;21(2):121–126. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2017.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talsania SD, Nallasamy N, Lee AR, et al. Risk factors for strabismus following glaucoma drainage device implantation for refractory childhood glaucoma. J AAPOS. 2019;23(3):.e145.141–.e145.146. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2019.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavin MJ, Franks WA, Wormald RP, et al. Clinical risk factors for failure in glaucoma tube surgery. A comparison of three tube designs. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110(4):480–485. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1992.01080160058030
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shah AA, WuDunn D, Cantor LB. Shunt revision versus additional tube shunt implantation after failed tube shunt surgery in refractory glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;129(4):455–460. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9394(99)00410-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuo W, Lesk MR. Surgical outcome of replacing a failed Ahmed glaucoma valve by a baerveldt glaucoma implant in the same quadrant in refractory glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2018;27(5):421–428. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000912
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sood S, Beck AD. Cyclophotocoagulation versus sequential tube shunt as a secondary intervention following primary tube shunt failure in pediatric glaucoma. J AAPOS. 2009;13(4):379–383. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2009.05.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser TS, Mulvihill MS, Freedman SF. Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation (ECP) for childhood glaucoma: a large single-center cohort experience. J AAPOS. 2019;23(2):.84.e81–.84.e87. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2018.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang SC, Soong HK, Brenz RM, et al. Problems associated with penetrating keratoplasty for corneal edema in congenital glaucoma. Ophthalmic Surg. 1989;20(6):399–402. doi: 10.3928/1542-8877-19890601-05
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hu Y, Fang L, Guo X, et al. Corneal configurations and high-order aberrations in primary congenital glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2018;27(12):1112–1118. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samant M, Chauhan BK, Lathrop KL, et al. Congenital aniridia: etiology, manifestations and management. Expert Rev Ophthalmol. 2016;11(2):135–144. doi: 10.1586/17469899.2016.1152182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson A, Mian SI, Bohnsack BL. Clinical outcomes and visual prognostic factors in congenital aniridia. BMC Ophthalmol. 2022;22(1):235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Netland PA, Scott ML, Boyle JW, et al. Ocular and systemic findings in a survey of aniridia subjects. J AAPOS. 2011;15(6):562–566. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2011.07.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang JW, Kim JH, Kim S-J, et al. Congenital aniridia: long-term clinical course, visual outcome, and pronostic factors. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2014;28(6):479–485. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2014.28.6.479
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang JD, Zhang JS, Xiong Y, et al. Congenital aniridia with cataract: case series. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017;17(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0503-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swanner JC, Walton DS, Chen TC. Prevention of aniridic glaucoma with goniosurgery. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2004;44(1):67–71. doi:10.1097/00004397-200404410-00008
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Balikov DA, Jacobson A, Prasov L. Glaucoma syndromes: insights into glaucoma genetics and pathogenesis from monogenic syndromic disorders. Genes (Basel). 2021;12(9):1403. doi: 10.3390/genes12091403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajwa A, Burstein E, Grainger RM, et al. Anterior chamber angle in aniridia with and without glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019;13:1469–1473. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S217930
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz-Negrete FJ, Teus MA, García-Feijoó J, et al. Aniridic glaucoma: an update. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol (Engl Ed). 2021;96(Suppl 1):52–59. doi: 10.1016/j.oftal.2020.11.005
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Adachi M, Dickens CJ, Hetherington JJ, et al. Clinical experience of trabeculotomy for the surgical treatment of aniridic glaucoma. Ophthalmol. 1997;104(12):2121–2125. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(97)30041-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durai I, Pallamparthy S, Puthuran GV, et al. Outcomes of glaucoma drainage device implantation and trabeculectomy with mitomycin C in glaucoma secondary to aniridia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2021;227:173–181. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.03.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arroyave CP, Scott IU, Gedde SJ, et al. Use of glaucoma drainage devices in the management of glaucoma associated with aniridia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;135:155–159. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9394(02)01934-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirok GS, Eksioglu U, Yakin M, et al. Short- and long-term results of glaucoma valve implantation for aniridia-related glaucoma: a case series and literature review. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2019;49:183–187. doi: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2019.07348
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Latta L, Figueiredo FC, Ashery-Padan R, et al. Pathophysiology of aniridia-associated keratopathy: developmental aspects and unanswered questions. Ocul Surf. 2021;22:245–266. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2021.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Velthoven AJH, Utheim TP, Notara M, et al. Future directions in managing aniridia-associated keratopathy. Surv Ophthalmol. 2023;68(5):940–956. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2023.04.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung AY, Sarnicola E, Kurji KH, et al. Cincinnati protocol for preoperative screening and donor selection for ocular surface stem cell transplantation. Cornea. 2018;37(9):1192–1197. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001662
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland EJ, Djalilian AR, Schwartz GS. Management of aniridic keratopathy with keratolimbal allograft: a limbal stem cell transplantation technique. Ophthalmol. 2003;110(1):125–130. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01451-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kremer I, Rajpal RK, Rapuano CJ, et al. Results of penetrating keratoplasty in aniridia. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;115(3):317–320. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9394(14)73581-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nascimento ESR, Shen LQ, Chiou CA, et al. Glaucoma management in patients with aniridia and boston type 1 keratoprosthesis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;207:258–267. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.06.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonneau S, Tong CM, Yang Y, et al. The treatment of end-stage corneal disease: penetrating keratoplasty compared with Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022;260(9):2781–2790. doi: 10.1007/s00417-022-05646-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romano D, Bremond-Gignac D, Barbany M, et al. Artificial iris implantation in congenital aniridia: a systematic review. Surv Ophthalmol. 2022;68(4):794–808. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2022.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickmann A, Szurman P, Januschowski K, et al. Long-term results after artificial iris implantation in patients with aniridia. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016;254(7):1419–1424. doi: 10.1007/s00417-016-3292-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields MB, Buckley E, Klintworth GK, et al. Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome. A spectrum of developmental disorders. Surv Ophthalmol. 1985;29(6):387–409. doi: 10.1016/0039-6257(85)90205-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozeki H, Shirai S, Ikeda K, et al. Anomalies associated with Axenfeld–Rieger syndrome. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1999;237(9):730–734. doi: 10.1007/s004170050304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michels K, Bohnsack BL. Ophthalmological manifestations of axenfeld-rieger syndrome: current perspectives. Clin Ophthalmol. 2023;17:819–828. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S379853
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zepeda EM, Branham K, Moroi SE, et al. Surgical outcomes of glaucoma associated with Axenfeld–Rieger syndrome. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020;20:172. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01417-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis LM, Maheshwari M, Capasso J, et al. Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome: more than meets the eye. J Med Genet. 2022;60(4):368–379. doi: 10.1136/jmg-2022-108646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields MB. Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome: a theory of mechanism and distinctions from the iridocorneal endothelial syndrome. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1983;81:736–784.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alsheikheh A, Klink J, Klink T, et al. Long-term results of surgery in childhood glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007;245(2):195–203. doi: 10.1007/s00417-006-0415-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shigeyasu C, Yamada M, Mizuno Y, et al. Clinical features of anterior segment dysgenesis associated with congenital corneal opacities. Cornea. 2012;31(3):293–298. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31820cd2ab
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurilec JM, Zaidman GW. Incidence of Peters anomaly and congenital corneal opacities interfering with vision in the United States. Cornea. 2014;33(8):848–850. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000000182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhandari R, Ferri S, Whittaker B, et al. Peters anomaly: review of the literature. Cornea. 2011;30(8):939–944. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31820156a9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolezal KA, Besirli CG, Mian SI, et al. Glaucoma and cornea surgery outcomes in Peters anomaly. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;208:367–375. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.08.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao KV, Fernandes M, Gangopadhyay N, et al. Outcome of penetrating keratoplasty for Peters anomaly. Cornea. 2008;27(7):749–753. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31816fe9a7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe MT, Keane MC, Coster DJ, et al. The outcome of corneal transplantation in infants, children, and adolescents. Ophthalmol. 2011;118(3):492–497. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.07.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang LL, Lambert SR. Peters’ anomaly. A synopsis of surgical management and visual outcome. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2001;14(3):467–477. doi:10.1016/S0896-1549(05)70245-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chang JW, Kim JH, Kim SJ, et al. Long-term clinical course and visual outcome associated with Peters’ anomaly. Eye (Lond). 2012;26(9):1237–1242. doi: 10.1038/eye.2012.128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldave AJ, Kamal KM, Vo RC, et al. The Boston type I keratoprosthesis: improving outcomes and expanding indications. Ophthalmol. 2009;116(4):640–651. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.12.058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu YC, Soh YQ, Kocaba V, et al. Selective endothelial removal: a case series of a phase I/II surgical trial with long-term follow up. Front Med. 2022;9:901187. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.901187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramappa M, Chaurasia S, Mohamed A, et al. Selective endothelialectomy in Peters anomaly: a novel surgical technique and its clinical outcomes in children. Cornea. 2022;41(12):1477–1486. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000003134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spierer O, Cavuoto KM, Suwannaraj S, et al. Outcome of optical iridectomy in Peters anomaly. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018;256(9):1679–1683. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-4000-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajagopal RN, Fernandes M. Peters anomaly: novel non-invasive alternatives to penetrating keratoplasty. Semin Ophthalmol. 2023;38(3):275–282. doi:10.1080/08820538.2023.2176238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang LL, Lambert SR, Lynn MJ, et al. Surgical management of glaucoma in infants and children with Peters’ anomaly: long-term structural and functional outcome. Ophthalmol. 2004;111(1):112–117. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson A, Besirli CG, Bohnsack BL. Outcomes of combined endoscopic vitrectomy and posteriorly placed glaucoma drainage devices in pediatric patients. BMC Ophthalmol. 2022;22(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02373-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nischal KK. Genetics of congenital corneal opacification–impact on diagnosis and treatment. Cornea. 2015;34 Suppl(10):S24–34. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000552
   Google Scholar
• Ma DH, Yeh LK, Chen HC, et al. Epithelial phenotype in total sclerocornea. Mol Vis. 2014;20:468–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanai A, Wood TC, Polack FM, et al. The fine structure of sclerocornea. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1971;10(9):687–694.
   Google Scholar
• Quiroz-Casian N, Chacon-Camacho OF, Barragan-Arevalo T, et al. Sclerocornea-microphthalmia-aphakia complex: description of two additional cases associated with novel FOXE3 mutations and review of the literature. Cornea. 2018;37(9):1178–1181. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001655
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma N, Agarwal R, Jhanji V, et al. Lamellar keratoplasty in children. Surv Ophthalmol. 2020;65(6):675–690. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2020.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaisancié J, Ragge NK, Dollfus H, et al. FOXE3 mutations: genotype-phenotype correlations. Clin Genet. 2018;93(4):837–845. doi: 10.1111/cge.13177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson AC, Thompson MO, Lim ME, et al. Microphthalmia, dermal aplasia, and sclerocornea syndrome: endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation in the management of congenital glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2018;27(1):e7–e10. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson A, Moroi SE, Bohnsack BL. Characteristics and outcomes of glaucoma associated with congenital ectropion uvea. Am J Ophthalmol. 2022;241:1–8. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2021.08.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling JL, Albert DM, Nelson LB, et al. Primary glaucoma associated with iridotrabecular dysgenesis and ectropion uveae. Ophthalmol. 1985;92(7):912–921. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(85)33935-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang GM, Thuente D, Bohnsack BL. Angle closure glaucoma in congenital ectropion uvea. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2018;10:215–220. doi: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2018.03.009
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edward DP, Morales J, Bouhenni RA, et al. Congenital ectropion uvea and mechanisms of glaucoma in neurofibromatosis type 1. Ophthalmol. 2012;119:1485–1494. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.01.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritch R, Forges M, Hetherington J, et al. Congenital ectropion uveae with glaucoma. Ophthalmol. 1984;91:326–331. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(84)34288-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaushik S, Choudhary S, Kaur A, et al. Neonatal-onset congenital ectropion uveae may be caused by a distinct CYP1B1 pathologic variant. Am J Ophthalmol. 2022;239:54–65. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2022.01.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong APC, Zhang J, Vincent AL, et al. Megalocornea, anterior megalophthalmos, keratoglobus and associated anterior segment disorders: a review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021;49(5):477–497. doi: 10.1111/ceo.13958
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messina M, Ross AR, Pocobelli G, et al. Cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation in 3 brothers with megalocornea: long-term follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018;44(3):399–402. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.01.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumawat D, Alam T, Sahay P, et al. Ocular abnormalities and complications in anterior megalophthalmos: a case series. Eye (Lond). 2019;33(5):826–832. doi: 10.1038/s41433-018-0329-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathi VM, Murthy SI, Bagga B, et al. Keratoglobus: an experience at a tertiary eye care center in India. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2015;63(3):233–238. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.156927
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar