The role of prior task experience in temporal misestimation

REFERENCES

• Brown , S. W. 1997 . Attentional resources in timing: Interference effects in concurrent temporal and nontemporal working memory tasks . Perception & Psychophysics , 59 : 1118 – 1140 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buehler , R. , Griffin , D. and MacDonald , H. 1997 . The role of motivated reasoning in optimistic time predictions . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 23 : 238 – 247 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buehler , R. , Griffin , D. and Ross , M. 1994 . Exploring the “planning fallacy”: Why people underestimate their task completion times . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 67 : 366 – 381 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt , C. D. B. and Kemp , S. 1994 . Construction of activity duration and time management potential . Applied Cognitive Psychology , 8 : 155 – 168 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byram , S. J. 1997 . Cognitive and motivational factors influencing time predictions . Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied , 3 : 216 – 239 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis-Smythe , J. A. and Robertson , I. T. 1999 . On the relationship between time management and time estimation . British Journal of Psychology , 90 : 333 – 348 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Josephs , R. A. and Hahn , E. D. 1995 . Bias and accuracy in estimates of task duration . Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 61 : 202 – 213 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman , D. and Tversky , A. 1979 . Intuitive prediction: Biases and corrective procedures . TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences , 12 : 313 – 327 .
   Google Scholar
• König , C. J. 2005 . Anchors distort estimates of expected duration . Psychological Reports , 96 : 253 – 256 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newby-Clark , I. R. , Ross , M. , Buehler , R. , Koehler , D. J. and Griffin , D. 2000 . People focus on optimistic scenarios and disregard pessimistic scenarios when predicting task completion times . Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied , 6 : 171 – 182 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy , M. M. , Christenfeld , J. S. and McKenzie , C. R. M. 2005 . Underestimating the duration of future events: Memory incorrectly utilized or memory bias? . Psychological Bulletin , 131 : 738 – 756 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas , K. E. , Handley , S. J. and Newstead , S. E. 2004 . The effects of prior experience on estimating the duration of simple tasks . Current Psychology of Cognition , 22 : 83 – 100 .
   Google Scholar
• Thomas , K. E. , Newstead , S. E. and Handley , S. J. 2003 . Exploring the time prediction process: The effects of task experience and complexity on prediction accuracy . Applied Cognitive Psychology , 17 : 655 – 673 .
   Google Scholar
• Tversky , A. and Kahneman , D. 1974 . Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases . Science , 185 : 1124 – 1131 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarmey , A. D. 2000 . Retrospective duration estimations for variant and invariant events in field situations . Applied Cognitive Psychology , 14 : 45 – 57 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakay , D. 1989 . “ Subjective time and attentional resource allocation: An integrated model of time estimation ” . In Time and cognition: A life span perspective , Edited by: Levin , I. and Zakay , D. 365 – 397 . Amsterdam : North Holland .
   Google Scholar
• Zakay , D. and Block , R. A. 1996 . “ The role of attention in time estimation processes ” . In Advances in psychology 115: Time, internal clocks and movement , Edited by: Pastor , A. M. and Artieda , J. 143 – 164 . Amsterdam : North-Holland .
   Google Scholar