Causal conjunction fallacies: The roles of causal strength and mental resources

REFERENCES

• Agnoli , F. and Krantz , D. H. 1989 . Suppressing natural heuristics by formal instruction: The case of the conjunction fallacy . Cognitive Psychology , 2 : 515 – 550 .
   Google Scholar
• Aijzen , I. 1977 . Intuitive theories of events and the effects of base-rate information on prediction . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 35 : 303 – 314 .
   Google Scholar
• Aron , A. R. , Robbins , T. W. and Poldrack , R. A. 2004 . Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex . Trends in Cognitive Sciences , 8 : 170 – 177 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen , J. 1988 . Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences , Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc .
   Google Scholar
• Cosmides , L. and Tooby , J. 1996 . Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty . Cognition , 58 : 1 – 73 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Neys , W. 2006a . Automatic-heuristic and executive-analytic processing during reasoning: Chronometric and dual-task considerations . Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 59 : 1070 – 1100 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Neys , W. 2006b . Dual processing in reasoning: Two systems but one reasoner . Psychological Science , 17 : 428 – 433 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Neys , W. and Glumicic , T. 2008 . Conflict monitoring in dual process theories of thinking . Cognition , 106 : 1245 – 1299 .
   Google Scholar
• De Neys , W. , Schaeken , W. and d'Ydewalle , G. 2005 . Working memory and counterexample retrieval for causal conditionals . Thinking & Reasoning , 11 : 123 – 150 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Neys , W. , Vartanian , O. and Goel , V. 2008 . Smarter than we think: When our brains detect that we are biased . Psychological Science , 19 : 483 – 489 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dulany , D. E. and Hilton , D. J. 1991 . Conversational implicature, conscious representation and the conjunction fallacy . Social Cognition , 9 : 85 – 110 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein , S. , Pacini , R. , Denes-Raj , V. and Heier , H. 1996 . Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 71 : 363 – 406 .
   Google Scholar
• St. Evans , J. B. T. 2003 . In two minds: Dual process accounts of reasoning . Trends in Cognitive Science , 7 : 454 – 458 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• St. Evans , J. B. T. 2006 . The heuristic-analytical theory of reasoning: Extension and evaluation . Psychonomic Bulletin and Review , 13 : 378 – 395 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• St. Evans , J. B. T. 2007 . On the resolution of conflict in dual process theories of reasoning . Thinking & Reasoning , 13 : 321 – 339 .
   Google Scholar
• St. Evans , B. T. and Curtis-Holmes , J. 2005 . Rapid responding increases belief bias: Evidence for the dual-process theory of reasoning . Thinking & Reasoning , 11 : 382 – 389 .
   Google Scholar
• St. Evans , J. B. T. and Over , D. E. 1996 . Rationality and reasoning , Hove, , UK : Psychology Press .
   Google Scholar
• St. Evans , J. B. T. , Venn , S. and Feeney , A. 2002 . Implicit and explicit processes in a hypothesis testing task . British Journal of Psychology , 93 : 31 – 46 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fabre , J. M. , Caverni , J. P. and Jungermann , H. 1995 . Causality does influence conjunctive probability judgements if context and design allow for it . Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 63 : 1 – 5 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feeney , A. , Shafto , P. and Dunning , D. 2007 . Who is susceptible to conjunction fallacies in category-based induction? . Psychonomic Bulletin & Review , 14 : 884 – 889 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fenker , D. , Waldman , M. R. and Holyoak , K. J. 2005 . Accessing casual relations in semantic memory . Memory and Cognition , 33 : 1036 – 1046 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiedler , F. 1988 . The dependence of the conjunction fallacy on subtle linguistic factors . Psychological Research , 50 : 123 – 129 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisk , J. E. and Pidgeon , N. 1998 . Conditional probabilities, potential surprise and the conjunction fallacy . Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 51A : 655 – 681 .
   Google Scholar
• Fugelsang , J. A. and Thompson , V. A. 2003 . A dual-process model of belief and evidence interactions in causal reasoning . Memory & Cognition , 31 : 800 – 815 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Retamero , R. , Wallin , A. and Dieckmann , A. 2007 . Does causal knowledge help us be faster and more frugal in our decisions? . Memory and Cognition , 35 : 1399 – 1409 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer , G. 1996 . On narrow norms and vague heuristics: A reply to Kahneman and Tversky (1996) . Psychological Review , 103 : 592 – 596 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer , G. 1998 . We need statistical thinking, not statistical rituals . Behavioral and Brain Sciences , 21 : 199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilhooly , K. J. , Logie , R. H. , Wetherick , N. E. and Wynn , V. 1993 . Working memory and syllogistic reasoning tasks . Memory and Cognition , 21 : 115 – 124 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilovich , T. , Griffin , D. and Kahneman , D. 2002 . Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment , Edited by: Gilovich , T. , Griffin , D. and Kahneman , D. Cambridge, , UK : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Glymour , C. and Cheng , P. 1999 . “ Causal mechanism and probability: A normative approach ” . In Rational models of cognition , Edited by: Oaksford , M. and Chater , N. 295 – 313 . Oxford, , UK : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Gopnik , A. , Glymour , C. , Sobel , D. M. , Schulz , L. E. , Kushnir , T. and Danks , D. 2004 . A theory of causal learning in children: Causal maps and Bayes nets . Psychological Review , 111 : 3 – 32 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths , T. L. and Tenenbaum , J. B. 2005 . Structure and strength in causal induction . Cognitive Psychology , 51 : 334 – 384 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegarty , M. , Shah , P. and Miyake , A. 2000 . Constraints on using the dual-task methodology to specify the degree of central executive involvement in cognitive tasks . Memory and Cognition , 28 : 376 – 385 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertwig , R. and Gigerenzer , G. 1999 . The “conjunction fallacy” revisited: How intelligent inferences look like reasoning errors . Journal of Behavioral Decision Making , 12 : 275 – 305 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird , P. N. and Byrne , R. M. J. 1993 . “ Models and deductive rationality ” . In Rationality , Edited by: Manktelow , K. and Over , D. London : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman , D. and Frederick , S. 2002 . “ Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment ” . In Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment , Edited by: Gilovich , T. , Griffin , D. and Kahneman , D. 49 – 81 . New York : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman , D. and Tversky , A. 1982 . “ The simulation heuristic ” . In Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases , Edited by: Kahneman , D. , Slovic , P. and Tversky , A. 201 – 208 . New York : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Keil , F. C. 2006 . Explanation and understanding . Annual Review of Psychology , 57 : 227 – 254 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokis , J. , Macpherson , R. , Toplak , M. E. , West , R. F. and Stanovich , K. E. 2002 . Heuristic and analytical processing: Age trends and associations with cognitive ability and cognitive styles . Journal of Experimental Child Psychology , 83 : 26 – 52 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krynski , T. R. and Tenenbaum , J. B. 2007 . The role of causality in judgment under uncertainty . Journal of Experimental Psychology: General , 136 : 430 – 450 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhmann , C. C. and Ahn , W. 2005 . The meaning and computation of causal power: A critique of Cheng (1997) and Novick and Cheng (2004) . Psychological Review , 112 : 685 – 693 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morsanyi , K. and Handley , S. J. 2008 . How smart do you need to be to get it wrong? The role of cognitive capacity in the development of heuristic-based judgment . Journal of Experimental Child Psychology , 99 : 18 – 36 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mynatt , C. R. , Doherty , M. E. and Dragan , W. 1993 . Information relevance, working memory and the consideration of alternatives . Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 46A : 759 – 778 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osman , M. 2004 . An evaluation of dual process theories of reasoning . Psychonomic Bulletin and Review , 11 : 988 – 1010 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Over , D. E. , Hadjichristidis , C. , Evans , J. S. T. , Handley , S. J. and Sloman , S. A. 2007 . The probability of causal conditionals . Cognitive Psychology , 54 : 62 – 97 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Politzer , G. and Noveck , I. A. 1991 . Are conjunction rule violations the result of conversational rule violations? . Journal of Psycholinguistic Research , 20 : 83 – 103 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn , S. and Markovits , H. 1998 . Conditional reasoning, causality, and the structure of semantic memory: Strength of association as a predictive factor for content effect . Cognition , 68 : B98 – B101 .
   Google Scholar
• Rehder , B. and Hastie , R. 2001 . Causal knowledge and categories: The effects of causal beliefs on categorization, induction, and similarity . Journal of Experimental Psychology: General , 130 : 323 – 360 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers , T. T. and McClelland , J. L. 2004 . Semantic cognition: A parallel distributed processing approach , Cambridge, MA : MIT Press .
   Google Scholar
• Shanks , D. R. and Dickinson , A. 1987 . Associative accounts of causality . Psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory , 21 : 229 – 261 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sides , A. , Osherson , D. , Bonini , N. and Viale , R. 2002 . On the reality of the conjunction fallacy . Memory and Cognition , 30 : 191 – 198 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloman , S. A. 1996 . The empirical case for two systems of reasoning . Psychological Bulletin , 119 : 3 – 22 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloman , S. A. 2005 . Causal models: How people think about the world and its alternatives , Oxford, , UK : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Sloman , S. A. and Hagmayer , Y. 2006 . The causal psycho-logic of choice . Trends in Cognitive Sciences , 10 : 407 – 412 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloman , S. A. and Lagnado , D. A. 2005 . Do we “do”? . Cognitive Science , 29 : 5 – 39 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich , K. E. 1999 . Who is rational? , Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc .
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich , K. E. and West , R. F. 1998a . Individual differences in framing and conjunction effects . Thinking & Reasoning , 4 : 289 – 317 .
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich , K. E. and West , R. F. 1998b . Individual differences in rational thought . Journal of Experimental Psychology: General , 12 : 161 – 188 .
   Google Scholar
• Steyvers , M. , Tenenbaum , J. B. , Wagenmakers , E.-J. and Blum , B. 2003 . Inferring causal networks from observations and interventions . Cognitive Science , 27 : 453 – 489 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenenbaum , J. B. and Griffiths , T. L. 2001 . “ Structure learning in human causal induction ” . In Advances in neural information processing systems , Edited by: Leen , T. , Dietterich , T. and Tresp , V. Vol. 13 , 59 – 65 . Cambridge, MA : MIT Press .
   Google Scholar
• Tenenbaum , J. B. and Griffiths , T. L. 2003 . “ Theory-based causal induction ” . In Advances in neural information processing systems , Edited by: Becker , S. , Thrun , S. and Obermayer , K. Vol. 15 , 35 – 42 . Cambridge, MA : MIT Press .
   Google Scholar
• Tentori , K. , Bonini , N. and Osherson , D. 2004 . The conjunction fallacy: A misunderstanding about conjunction? . Cognitive Science , 28 : 467 – 477 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thüring , M. and Jungermann , H. 1990 . The conjunction fallacy: Causality vs. event probability . Journal of Behavioral Decision Making , 3 : 61 – 73 .
   Google Scholar
• Tversky , A. and Kahneman , D. 1983 . Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgement . Psychological Review , 90 : 293 – 307 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verschueren , N. , Schaeken , W. and d'Ydewalle , G. 2005 . A dual-process specification of causal conditional reasoning . Thinking & Reasoning , 11 : 239 – 278 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldmann , M. R. 2001 . Predictive versus diagnostic causal learning: Evidence from an overshadowing paradigm . Psychometric Bulletin & Review , 8 : 600 – 608 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldmann , M. R. and Hagmayer , Y. 2001 . Estimating causal strength: The role of structural knowledge and processing effort . Cognition , 82 : 27 – 58 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wason , P. C. 1966 . “ Reasoning ” . In New horizons in psychology , Edited by: Foss , B. 135 – 151 . Harmondsworth, , UK : Penguin Books .
   Google Scholar
• Wedell , D. H. and Moro , R. 2008 . Testing boundary conditions for the conjunction fallacy: Effects of response mode, conceptual focus and problem type . Cognition , 107 : 105 – 136 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan , R. A. and Radvansky , G. A. 1998 . Situation models in language comprehension and memory . Psychological Bulletin , 123 : 162 – 185 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar