A positive patterning advantage with complex but not simple patterning: A cue constellation approach

REFERENCES

• Bellingham, W. P., Gillette-Bellingham, K., & Kehoe, E. J. (1985). Summation and configuration in patterning schedules with rat and rabbit. Animal Learning and Behavior, 13, 152–164. doi: 10.3758/BF03199268
   Google Scholar
• Brandon, S. E., Vogel, E. H., & Wagner, A. R. (2000). A componential view of configural cues in generalization and discrimination in Pavlovian conditioning. Behavioural Brain Research, 110, 67–72. doi: 10.1016/S0166-4328(99)00185-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Criss, A., & Shiffrin, R. (2004). Pairs do not suffer interference from other types of pairs or single items in associative recognition. Memory & Cognition, 32, 1284–1297. doi: 10.3758/BF03206319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deisig, N., Lachnit, H., Giurfa, M., & Hellstern, F. (2001). Configural olfactory learning in honeybees: Negative and positive patterning discrimination. Learning & Memory, 8, 70–78. doi: 10.1101/lm.8.2.70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deisig, N., Sandoz, J.-C., Giurfa, M., & Lachnit, H. (2007).The trial-spacing effect in olfactory patterning discriminations in honeybees. Behavioural Brain Research, 176, 314–322. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.10.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delamater, A. R. (2012). On the nature of CS and US representations in Pavlovian learning. Learning & Behavior, 40, 1–23. doi: 10.3758/s13420-011-0036-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estes, W. K., & Hopkins, B. L. (1961). Acquisition and transfer in pattern-vs.-component discrimination learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 322–328. doi: 10.1037/h0044590
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grand, C., & Honey, R. C. (2008). Solving XOR. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 34, 486–493. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.34.4.486
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, J. A. (2006). Elemental representations of stimuli in associative learning. Psychological Review, 113, 584–605. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.3.584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, J. A., & Livesey, E. J. (2008). Comparing patterning and biconditional discriminations in humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 34, 144–154. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.34.1.144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopfield, J. F., & Gelperin, A. (1989). Differential conditioning to a compound and its components in the terrestrial slug Limax maximus. Behavioral Neuroscience, 103, 329–333. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.103.2.329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamin, L. J. (1969). Predictability, surprise, attention and conditioning. In B. A. Campbell & R. M. Church (Eds.), Punishment and aversive behavior (pp. 279–296). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Kehoe, E. J., & Graham, P. (1988). Summation and configuration in negative patterning of the rabbit's conditioned, nictitating membrane response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 320–333. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.14.3.320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinder, A. & Lachnit, H. (2002). Responding under time pressure: Testing an animal learning model and a model of visual categorization. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 155A, 173–193.
   Google Scholar
• Kinder, A., & Lachnit, H. (2003). Similarity and discrimination in human Pavolvian conditioning. Psychophysiology, 40, 226–234. doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.00024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komischke, B., Sandoz, J.-C., Lachnit, H., & Giurfa, M. (2003). Non-elemental processing in olfactory discrimination tasks needs bilateral input in honeybees. Behavioural Brain Research, 145, 135–143. doi: 10.1016/S0166-4328(03)00105-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livesey, E. J., Thorwart, A., & Harris, J. A. (2011). Comparing positive and negative patterning in human learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 2316–2333. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.605153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaren, I. P. L., & Macintosh, N. J. (2002). Associative learning and elemental representation: II. Generalization and discrimination. Animal Learning & Behavior, 30, 177–200. doi: 10.3758/BF03192828
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Melchers, K. G., Shanks, D. R., & Lachnit, H. (2008). Stimulus coding in human associative learning: Flexible representations of parts and wholes. Behavioural Processes, 77, 413–427. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2007.09.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, K. M., Vogel, E. H., Shin, J., & Wagner, A. R. (2001). A comparison of the Rescorla–Wagner and Pearce models in a negative patterning and a summation problem. Animal Learning & Behavior, 29, 36–45. doi: 10.3758/BF03192814
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, J. M. (1994). Similarity and discrimination: A selective review and connectionist model. Psychological Review, 101, 578–607. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, J. M., & George, D. N. (2002). The effects of using stimuli from three different dimensions on autoshaping with a complex negative patterning discrimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55B, 349–364.
   Google Scholar
• Redhead, E. S. (2007). Multimodal discrimination learning in humans: Evidence for configural theory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1477–1495. doi: 10.1080/17470210601154560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redhead, E. S., & Pearce, J. M. (1995). Similarity and discrimination learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48B, 46–66.
   Google Scholar
• Rescorla, R. A. (1969). Pavlovian conditioned inhibition. Psychological Bulletin, 72, 77–94. doi: 10.1037/h0027760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rescorla, R. A. (1972). “Configural” conditioning in discrete-trial bar pressing. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 79, 307–317. doi: 10.1037/h0032553
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rescorla, R. A. (1973). Evidence for “unique stimulus” account of configural conditioning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 85, 331–338. doi: 10.1037/h0035046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. K. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II (pp. 64–99). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Shanks, D. R., Charles, D., Darby, R. J., & Azmi, A. (1998). Configural processes in human associative learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1353–1378. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.24.6.1353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanks, D. R., Darby, R. J., & Charles, D. (1998). Resistance to interference in human associative learning: Evidence of configural processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 24, 136–150. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.24.2.136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloman, S. (1996).The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3–22. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, K. W. (1952). The nature of the response in discrimination learning. Psychological Review, 59, 89–93. doi: 10.1037/h0063067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorwart, A., Schultheis, H., Konig, S., & Lachnit, H. (2009). ALTSim: A MATLAB simulator for current associative learning models. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 29–34. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.1.29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, A. R. (2003). Context-sensitive elemental theory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56B, 7–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, A. R., & Brandon, S. E. (2001). A componential theory of Pavlovian conditioning. In R. R. Mowrer & S. B. Klein (Eds.), Handbook of contemporary learning theories (pp. 23–64). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, A. R., Logan, F. A., Haberlandt, K., & Price, T. (1968). Stimulus selection in animal discrimination learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76, 171–180. doi: 10.1037/h0025414
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wagner, A. R., & Rescorla, R. A. (1972). Inhibition in Pavlovian conditioning: Application of a theory. In R. A. Boakes & M. S. Halliday (Eds.), Inhibition and learning (pp. 301–336). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, A. R., & Vogel, E. (2008). Configural and elemental processing in associative learning: Commentary on Melchers, Shanks, & Lachnit. Behavioural Processes, 77, 446–450. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2007.09.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman, E. A., Kao, S.-F., Van Hamme, L. J., Katagiri, M., & Young, M. E. (1996). Causation and association. In D. R. Shanks, D. L. Medin, & K. J. Holyoak (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Causal learning (pp. 207–264). New York, NY: Academic Press.34
   Google Scholar
• Whitlow, J. W., Jr. (2009, November). The elements of configural learning: Common, unique or replaced? Paper presented at annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Whitlow, J. W.Jr. (2010). The effects of outcome valence on positive and negative patterning in human causal reasoning. Learning and Behavior, 38, 145–159. doi: 10.3758/LB.38.2.145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitlow, J. W., Jr. (2013). Negative patterning and biconditional discriminations in human causal reasoning: A second look. American Journal of Psychology, 126, 11–21. doi: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.126.1.0011
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whitlow, J. W.Jr., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). Negative patterning in classical conditioning: Summation of response tendencies to isolable and configural components. Psychonomic Science, 27, 299–301. doi: 10.3758/BF03328970
   Google Scholar
• Woodbury, C. B. (1943). The learning of stimulus patterns by dogs. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 35, 29–40. doi: 10.1037/h0054061
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. E., Wasserman, E. A., Johnson, J. L, & Jones, F. L. (2000). Positive and negative patterning in human causal learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53B, 121–138.
   Google Scholar