The “BIG BIRD” of the “YELLOW YOUNG” man: Do nontarget properties cascade?

REFERENCES

• Alario, F.-X., & Ferrand, L. (1999). A set of 400 pictures standardized for French: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, and age of acquisition. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 531–552. doi: 10.3758/BF03200732
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., & … Treiman, R. (2007). The English Lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445–459. doi: 10.3758/BF03193014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D. M. (2005). Fitting linear mixed models in R. R News, 5, 27–30.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M. (2009). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes, , Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
   Google Scholar
• Bloem, I., & La Heij, W. (2003). Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in word translation: Implications for models of lexical access in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 468–488. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00503-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonin, P., Chalard, M., Méot, A., & Fayol, M. (2002). The determinants of spoken and written picture naming latencies. British Journal of Psychology, 93, 89–114. doi: 10.1348/000712602162463
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonin, P., Peereman, R., Malardier, N., Méot, A., & Chalard, M. (2003). A new set of 299 pictures for psycholinguistic studies: French norms for name agreement, image agreement, conceptual familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, age of acquisition, and naming latencies. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 158–167. doi: 10.3758/BF03195507
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonin, P., Roux, S., Barry, C., Canell, L. (2012). Evidence for a limited-cascading account of written word naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 38, 1741–1758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., Keuleers, E., & New, B. (2011). Assessing the usefulness of Google Books' word frequencies for psycholinguistic research on word processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 27 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A. (1997). How many levels of processing are there in lexical access?. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 177–208. doi: 10.1080/026432997381664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chateau, D., & Lupker, S. J. (2003). Strategic effects in word naming: Examining the route-emphasis versus time-criterion accounts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 139–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., McWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 257–271. doi: 10.3758/BF03204507
   Google Scholar
• Cutting, J. C., & Ferreira, V. S. (1999). Semantic and phonological information flow in the production lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 318–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cycowicz, Y. M., Friedman, D., Rothstein, M., & Snodgrass, J. G. (1997). Picture naming by young children: Norms for name agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 65, 171–237. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1996.2356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damian, M. F., & Martin, R. C. (1999). Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(2), 345–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Gagnon, D. A. (1997). Lexical access in aphasic and non-aphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104, 801–838. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.104.4.801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumay, N., & Damian, M. F. (2011). A word order constraint in single word production? Failure to replicate Janssen, Alario and Caramazza (2008). Psychological Science, 22, 559–561. doi: 10.1177/0956797611401754
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldrick, M. (2006). Limited interaction in speech production: Chronometric, speech error, and neuropsychological evidence. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 817–855.
   Google Scholar
• Humphreys, G. W., Riddoch, M. J., & Quinlan, P. T. (1988). Cascade processes in picture naming identification. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 67–104. doi: 10.1080/02643298808252927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, N., Alario, F.-X., & Caramazza, A. (2008). A word-order constraint on phonological activation. Psychological Science, 19, 216–220. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02070.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jescheniak, J. D., Oppermann, F., Hantsch, A., Wagner, V., Mädebach, A., & Schriefers, H. (2009). Do perceived context pictures automatically activate their phonological code?. Experimental Psychology, 56, 56–65. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.1.56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, S. H. K., Yap, M. J., Tse, C., & Kurby, C. A. (2011). Semantic size does not matter: “Bigger” words are not recognized faster. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 1041–1047. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.575947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kello, C. T., & Kawamoto, A. H. (1998). Runword: An IBM-PC software package for the collection and acoustic analysis of speeded naming responses. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 30, 371–383. doi: 10.3758/BF03200668
   Google Scholar
• Konkle, T., & Oliva, A. (2011). Canonical visual size for real-world objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 23–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konkle, T., Olivia, A. (2012). A familiar-size Stroop effect: Real-world size is an automatic property of object representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human, Perception and Performance, 38, 561–569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuipers, J. R., & La Heij, W. (2009). The limitations of cascading in the speech production system. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 120–135. doi: 10.1080/01690960802234177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mädebach, A., Alekseeva, E., & Jescheniak, J. D. (2011). Word order does not constrain phonological activation in single word production. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23, 837–842. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2011.579071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masson, M. E. J. (2011). A tutorial on a practical bayesian alternative to null hypothesis significance testing. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 679–690. doi: 10.3758/s13428-010-0049-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, A. S., Damian, M. F. (2007). Activation of distractor names in the picture-picture interference paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 35, 494–503. doi: 10.3758/BF03193289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minear, M., & Park, D. C. (2004). A lifespan database of adult facial stimuli. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 630–633. doi: 10.3758/BF03206543
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morsella, E., & Miozzo, M. (2002). Evidence for a cascade model of lexical access in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 555–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarrete, E., Costa, A. (2005). Phonological activation of ignored pictures: Further evidence for a cascade model of lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 359–377. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New, B., Pallier, C., Ferrand, L., & Matos, R. (2001). Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet: LEXIQUE [A lexical database for modern French on the Internet: LEXIQUE]. L'Année Pschologique, 101, 447–462. doi: 10.3406/psy.2001.1341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, R. R., & Savoy, P. (1998). Lexical selection and phonological encoding during language production: Evidence for cascaded processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 539–557.
   Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org
   Google Scholar
• Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. In MarsdenP. V. (Ed.), Sociological methodology, (pp. 111–196). Cambridge: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Rapp, B., & Goldrick, M. (2000). Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. Psychological Review, 107, 460–499.
   Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., & Davis, M. (2002). On the complexities of measuring naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 307–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (2008). Tracing attention and the activation flow in spoken word planning using eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 353–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roux, S., & Bonin, P. (2012). Cascaded processing in written naming: Evidence from the picture-picture interference paradigm. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27, 734–769. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2011.580162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, W. (1995). Micro experimental laboratory, Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime reference guide, Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
   Google Scholar
• Sereno, S. C., O'Donnell, P. J., & Sereno, M. E. (2009). Size matters: Bigger is faster. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1115–1122. doi: 10.1080/17470210802618900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Székely, A., & Bates, E. (2000). Objective visual complexity as a variable in studies of picture naming. Center for Research in Language Newsletter, 12(2), 1–33, La Jolla: University of California, San Diego.
   Google Scholar