You better stop! Binding “stop” tags to irrelevant stimulus features

REFERENCES

• Aron, A. R., & Verbruggen, F. (2008). Stop the presses: Dissociating a selective from a global mechanism for stopping. Psychological Science, 19(11), 1146–1153. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02216.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bissett, P. G., & Logan, G. D. (2011). Balancing cognitive demands: Control adjustments in the stop-signal paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(2), 392–404. doi:10.1037/a0021800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boronat, C. B., & Logan, G. D. (1997). The role of attention in automatization: Does attention operate at encoding, or retrieval, or both? Memory & Cognition, 25(1), 36–46. doi: 10.3758/BF03197283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claffey, M. P., Sheldon, S., Stinear, C. M., Verbruggen, F., & Aron, A. R. (2010). Having a goal to stop action is associated with advance control of specific motor representations. Neuropsychologia, 48(2), 541–548. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.10.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colzato, L. S., van Wouwe, N. C., & Hommel, B. (2007). Feature binding and affect: Emotional modulation of visuo-motor integration. Neuropsychologia, 45(2), 440–446. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.06.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coxon, J. P., Stinear, C. M., & Byblow, W. D. (2007). Selective inhibition of movement. Journal of Neurophysiology, 97(3), 2480–2489. doi: 10.1152/jn.01284.2006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, R., Coles, M. G. H., & Logan, G. D. (1995). Strategies and mechanisms in nonselective and selective inhibitory motor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(3), 498–511. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.21.3.498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denkinger, B., & Koutstaal, W. (2009). Perceive-decide-act, perceive-decide-act: How abstract is repetition-related decision learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(3), 742–756. doi:10.1037/a0015263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. doi: 10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frings, C., & Rothermund, K. (2011). To be or not to be … included in an event file: Integration and retrieval of distractors in stimulus–response episodes is influenced by perceptual grouping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(5), 1209–1227. doi:10.1037/a0023915
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frings, C., Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2007). Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses to targets. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(10), 1367–1377. doi: 10.1080/17470210600955645
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner, W. R., & Felfoldy, G. L. (1970). Integrality of stimulus dimensions in various types of information processing. Cognitive Psychology, 1(3), 225–241. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(70)90016-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, H., & Stahl, J. (2008). Early activity in the lateralized readiness potential suggests prime-response retrieval as a source of negative priming. Experimental Psychology, 55(3), 164–172. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.55.3.164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giesen, C., Frings, C., & Rothermund, K. (2012). Differences in the strength of distractor inhibition do not affect distractor-response bindings. Memory & Cognition, 40(3), 373–387. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0157-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giesen, C., & Rothermund, K. (2011). Affective matching moderates S–R binding. Cognition and Emotion, 25(2), 342–350. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2010.482765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhouse, I., Oldenkamp, C. L., & Aron, A. R. (2012). Stopping a response has global or nonglobal effects on the motor system depending on preparation. Journal of Neurophysiology, 107(1), 384–392. doi: 10.1152/jn.00704.2011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus–response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5(1), 183–216. doi: 10.1080/713756773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(11), 494–500. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B. (2005). How much attention does an event file need? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(5), 1067–1082. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.31.5.1067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horner, A. J., & Henson, R. N. (2009). Bindings between stimuli and multiple response codes dominate long-lag repetition priming in speeded classification tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(3), 757–779. doi:10.1037/a0015262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horner, A. J., & Henson, R. N. (2011). Stimulus–response bindings code both abstract and specific representations of stimuli: Evidence from a classification priming design that reverses multiple levels of response representation. Memory & Cognition, 39(8), 1457–1471. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0118-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95(4), 492–527. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, G. D. (1994). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A users' guide to the stop signal paradigm. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 189–239). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. (1984). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychological Review, 91(3), 295–327. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.91.3.295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, G. D., & Etherton, J. L. (1994). What is learned during automatization? The role of attention in constructing an instance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(5), 1022–1050. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.5.1022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayr, S., & Buchner, A. (2006). Evidence for episodic retrieval of inadequate prime responses in auditory negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(4), 932–943. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.932
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayr, S., Buchner, A., & Dentale, S. (2009). Prime retrieval of motor responses in negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(2), 408–423. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.35.2.408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeller, B., & Frings, C. (2011). Remember the touch: Tactile distractors retrieve previous responses to targets. Experimental Brain Research, 214(1), 121–130. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2814-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeller, B., & Frings, C. (2012). Driver assistance designers beware: Distractor-response bindings influence response times to local danger warnings. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Moeller, B., Rothermund, K., & Frings, C. (2012). Integrating the irrelevant sound: Grouping modulates the integration of irrelevant auditory stimuli into event files. Experimental Psychology, 59(5), 258–264. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neill, W. T., & Valdes, L. A. (1992). Persistence of negative priming: Steady state or decay? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(3), 565–576. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.18.3.565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neill, W. T., Valdes, L. A., Terry, K. M., & Gorfein, D. S. (1992). Persistence of negative priming: II. Evidence for episodic trace retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(5), 993–1000. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.18.5.993
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pösse, B., Waszak, F., & Hommel, B. (2006). Do stimulus–response bindings survive a task switch? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18(4), 640–651. doi: 10.1080/09541440500423285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieger, M., & Gauggel, S. (1999). Inhibitory after-effects in the stop signal paradigm. British Journal of Psychology, 90(4), 509–518. doi: 10.1348/000712699161585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothermund, K., Eder, A. B., & Frings, C. (2013). Integration of affective outcomes with actions and situations: Negative feedback prevents retrieval of response information from S–R episodes. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Rothermund, K., Wentura, D., & De Houwer, J. (2005). Retrieval of incidental stimulus–response associations as a source of negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(3), 482–495. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Verbruggen, F., Liefooghe, B., & Vandierendonck, A. (2005). On the difference between response inhibition and negative priming: Evidence from simple and selective stopping. Psychological Research, 69(4), 262–271. Retrieved from doi: 10.1007/s00426-004-0177-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. D. (2008a). Long-term aftereffects of response inhibition: Memory retrieval, task goals, and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(5), 1229–1235. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. D. (2008b). Automatic and controlled response inhibition: Associative learning in the go/no-go and stop-signal paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(4), 649–672. doi: 10.1037/a0013170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbruggen, F., Logan, G. D., Liefooghe, B., & Vandierendonck, A. (2008). Short-term aftereffects of response inhibition: Repetition priming or between-trial control adjustments? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(2), 413–426. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.34.2.413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbruggen, F., Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. (2008). How to stop and change a response: The role of goal activation in multitasking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(5), 1212–1228. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waszak, F., Hommel, B., & Allport, A. (2003). Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology, 46(4), 361–413. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0285(02)00520-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waszak, F., Hommel, B., & Allport, A. (2005). Interaction of task readiness and automatic retrieval in task switching: Negative priming and competitor priming. Memory & Cognition, 33(4), 595–610. doi: 10.3758/BF03195327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waszak, F., & Pholulamdeth, V. (2009). Episodic S–R bindings and emotion: About the influence of positive and negative action effects on stimulus–response associations. Experimental Brain Research, 194(3), 489–494. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1745-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar