Comparing performance in discrete and continuous comparison tasks

REFERENCES

• Butterworth, B. (2010). Foundational numerical capacities and the origins of dyscalculia. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(12), 534–541. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantlon, J. F., Platt, M. L., & Brannon, E. M. (2009). Beyond the number domain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(2), 83–91. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castelli, F., Glaser, D. E., & Butterworth, B. (2006). Discrete and analogue quantity processing in the parietal lobe: A functional MRI study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(12), 4693–4698. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0600444103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordes, S., & Brannon, E. M. (2008). Quantitative competencies in infancy. Developmental Science, 11(6), 803–808. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00770.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S., Izard, V., Spelke, E., & Pica, P. (2008). Log or linear? Distinct intuitions of the number scale in Western and Amazonian indigene cultures. Science, 320(5880), 1217–1220. doi: 10.1126/science.1156540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S., Spelke, E., Pinel, P., Stanescu, R., & Tsivkin, S. (1999). Sources of mathematical thinking: Behavioral and brain-imaging evidence. Science, 284(5416), 970–974. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5416.970
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Hevia, M. D., & Spelke, E. S. (2009). Spontaneous mapping of number and space in adults and young children. Cognition, 110(2), 198–207. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feigenson, L., Carey, S., & Spelke, E. (2002). Infants' discrimination of number vs. continuous extent. Cognitive Psychology, 44(1), 33–66. doi: 10.1006/cogp.2001.0760
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feigenson, L., Dehaene, S., & Spelke, E. (2004). Core systems of number. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(7), 307–314. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebuis, T., & Gevers, W. (2011). Numerosities and space; indeed a cognitive illusion! A reply to de Hevia and Spelke (2009). Cognition, 121, 248–252. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.09.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebuis, T., & Reynvoet, B. (2011). Generating nonsymbolic number stimuli. Behavior Research Methods, 43(4), 981–986. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0097-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebuis, T., & Reynvoet, B. (2012). The interplay between nonsymbolic number and its continuous visual properties. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(4), 642–648. doi: 10.1037/a0026218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebuis, T., & Reynvoet, B. (2013). The neural mechanisms underlying passive and active processing of numerosity. NeuroImage, 70, 301–307. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.12.048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halberda, J., Mazzocco, M. M. M., & Feigenson, L. (2008). Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement. Nature, 455(7213), 665–668. doi: 10.1038/nature07246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henik, A., Leibovich, T., Naparstek, S., Diesendruck, L., & Rubinsten, O. (2012). Quantities, amounts, and the numerical core system. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00186 doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henik, A., & Tzelgov, J. (1982). Is three greater than five: The relation between physical and semantic size in comparison tasks. Memory and Cognition, 10(4), 389–395. doi: 10.3758/BF03202431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurewitz, F., Gelman, R., & Schnitzer, B. (2006). Sometimes area counts more than number. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(51), 19599–19604. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609485103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibovich, T., & Henik, A. (2013). Magnitude processing in non-symbolic stimuli. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 375. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A. J. (2006). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mix, K. S., Huttenlocher, J., & Levine, S. C. (2002). Multiple cues for quantification in infancy: Is number one of them? Psychological Bulletin, 128(2), 278–294. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.128.2.278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mussolin, C., & Mejias, S. (2010). Symbolic and nonsymbolic number comparison in children with and without dyscalculia. Cognition, 115(1), 10–25. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieder, A. (2005). Counting on neurons: The neurobiology of numerical competence. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(3), 177–190. doi: 10.1038/nrn1626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odic, D., Libertus, M. E., Feigenson, L., & Halberda, J. (2012). Developmental change in the acuity of approximate number and area representations. Developmental Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/a0029472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piazza, M. (2010). Neurocognitive start-up tools for symbolic number representations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(12), 542–551. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piazza, M., Facoetti, A., Trussardi, A. N., Berteletti, I., Conte, S., Lucangeli, D., . . . Zorzi, M. (2010). Developmental trajectory of number acuity reveals a severe impairment in developmental dyscalculia. Cognition, 116(1), 33–41.
   Google Scholar
• Tokita, M., & Ishiguchi, A. (2010). How might the discrepancy in the effects of perceptual variables on numerosity judgment be reconciled? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(7), 1839–1853. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.7.1839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trick, L. M., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1994). Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. Psychological Review, 101(1), 80–102. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.101.1.80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, V. (2003). A theory of magnitude: Common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(11), 483–488. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar