Exploring conflict- and target-related movement of visual attention

REFERENCES

• Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. W., Reynolds, J. R., & Braver, T. S. (2007). A computational model of fractionated conflict-control mechanisms in task-switching. Cognitive Psychology, 55, 37–85. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.09.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bugg, J. M. (2007). Opposing influences on conflict-driven adaptation in the Eriksen flanker task. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1217–1227. doi: 10.3758/MC.36.7.1217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, R. Y., Orr, J. M., Cohen, J. D., & Carter, C. S. (2009). Generalized signaling for control: Evidence from postconflict and posterror performance adjustments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1161–1177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davelaar, E. J., & Stevens, J. (2009). Sequential dependencies in the Eriksen flanker task: A direct comparison of two competing accounts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 121–126. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.1.121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egner, T. (2008). Multiple conflict-driven control mechanisms in the human brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 374–380. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target lettter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143–149. doi: 10.3758/BF03203267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksen, C. W. (1995). The flanker task and response competition: A useful tool for investigating a variety of cognitive problems. Visual Cognition, 2, 101–118. doi: 10.1080/13506289508401726
   Google Scholar
• Eriksen, C. W., Coles, M. G. H., Morris, L. R., & O'Hara, W. P. (1985). An electromyographic examination of response competition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23, 165–168. doi: 10.3758/BF03329816
   Google Scholar
• Eriksen, C. W., & St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 225–240. doi: 10.3758/BF03211502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Duque, D., & Knight, M. B. (2008). Cognitive control: Dynamic, sustained, and voluntary influences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 340–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freitas, A. L., Bahar, M., Yang, S., & Banai, R. (2007). Contextual adjustments in cognitive control across tasks. Psychological Science, 18, 1040–1043. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02022.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frings, C., & Wühr, P. (2007). On distractor repetition benefits in the negative-priming paradigm. Visual Cognition, 15, 166–178. doi: 10.1080/13506280500475264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funes, M. J., Lupiáñez, J., & Humphreys, G. (2010). Sustained vs. transient cognitive control: Evidence of a behavioural dissociation. Cognition, 114, 338–347. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giesen, C., Frings, C., & Rothermund, K. (2012). Differences in the strength of distractor inhibition do not affect distractor-response bindings. Memory & Cognition, 40, 373–387. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0157-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gratton, G., Coles, M. G., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 480–506. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B. (1995). Attentional scanning in the selection of central targets from multi-symbol strings. Visual Cognition, 2, 119–144. doi: 10.1080/13506289508401727
   Google Scholar
• Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183–216. doi: 10.1080/713756773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B. (2003). Spatial asymmetries in the flanker-congruency effect: Attentional scanning is biased by flanker orientation. Psychology Science, 45, 63–77.
   Google Scholar
• Hommel, B., Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 68, 1–17. doi: 10.1007/s00426-003-0132-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iani, C., Rubichi, S., Gherri, E., & Nicoletti, R. (2009). Co-occurrence of sequential and practice effects in the Simon task: Evidence for two independent mechanisms affecting response selection. Memory & Cognition, 37, 358–367. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.3.358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., & Hoffmann, J. (2006). Evidence for task-specific resolution of response conflict. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 800–806. doi: 10.3758/BF03194000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Control and interference in task switching—A review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 849–847. doi: 10.1037/a0019842
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaBerge, D. (1983). Spatial extent of attention to letters and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 9, 371–379. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.9.3.371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaBerge, D., & Brown, V. (1989). A model of perceptual classification in children and adults. Psychological Review, 96, 125–144. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.96.1.101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamers, M. J. M., & Roelofs, A. (2011). Attentional control adjustments in Eriksen and Stroop task performance can be independent of response conflict. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 1056–1081. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.523792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1996). Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 977–991. doi: 10.3758/BF03206826
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayr, U., Awh, E., & Laurey, P. (2003). Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 450–452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milliken, B., Tipper, S. P., Houghton, G., & Lupiáñez, J. (2000). Attending, ignoring, and repetition: On the relation between negative priming and inhibition of return. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1280–1296. doi: 10.3758/BF03212130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Notebaert, W., & Verguts, T. (2006). Stimulus conflict predicts conflict adaptation in a numerical flanker task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 1078–1084. doi: 10.3758/BF03213929
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Notebaert, W., & Verguts, T. (2008). Cognitive control acts locally. Cognition, 106, 1071–1080. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Houma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., Rafal, R. D., Choate, L. S., & Vaughan, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 211–228. doi: 10.1080/02643298508252866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purmann, S., Badde, S., & Wendt, M. (2009). Adjustments to recent and frequent conflict reflect two distinguishable mechanisms. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 350–355. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.2.350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remington, R. W., Folk, C. L., & McLean, J. P. (2001). Contingent attentional capture or delayed attentional allocation? Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 298–307. doi: 10.3758/BF03194470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schröter, H., & Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1345–1363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stürmer, B., Seiss, E., & Leuthold, H. (2005). Executive control in the Simon task: A dual-task examination of response priming and its suppression. The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17, 590–618. doi: 10.1080/09541440540000077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tipper, S. P., Brehaut, J. C., & Driver, J. (1990). Selection of moving and static objects for the control of spatially directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 492–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsal, Y. (1983). Movement of attention across the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 523–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullsperger, M., Bylsma, L. M., & Botvinick, M. M. (2005). The conflict-adaptation effect: It's not just priming. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 467–472. doi: 10.3758/CABN.5.4.467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbruggen, F., Notebaert, W., Liefooghe, B., & Vandierendonck, A. (2006). Stimulus- and response-conflict-induced cognitive control in the flanker task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 328–333. doi: 10.3758/BF03193852
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt, M., Kluwe, R. H., & Peters, A. (2006). Sequential modulations of interference evoked by processing task-irrelevant stimulus features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 644–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt, M., & Luna-Rodriguez, A. (2009). Conflict-frequency affects flanker interference: Role of stimulus-ensemble-specific practice and flanker-response contingencies. Experimental Psychology, 56, 206–217. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.3.206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt, M., Luna-Rodriguez, A., & Jacobsen, T. (2012). Conflict-induced perceptual filtering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 675–686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar